Do civil–military relations influence human rights practices? Building on principal–agent theory, we argue that civilian–military relations, instead of having an effect on mean levels of repression, will be associated with the dispersion in human rights practices. States where there is less control of the military or more conflict between civilian and military leadership will see a wider range of human rights practices. We test our hypotheses quantitatively on a global sample of countries, using updated data on civil–military relations and find evidence that civil–military conflict and lack of control increase the variance in human right practices.
AshK. (2016). Threats to leaders’ political survival and pro-government militia formation. International Interactions, 42(5), 703–728.
3.
BarryC. M.Chad ClayK.FlynnM. E. (2013). Avoiding the spotlight: Human rights shaming and foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 532–544.
4.
BondD.BondJ.OhC.JenkinsJ. C.TaylorC. L. (2003). Integrated data for events analysis (IDEA): An event typology for automated events data development. Journal of Peace Research, 40(6), 733–745.
5.
Bueno De MesquitaB.SmithA.MorrowJ. D.SiversonR. M. (2005). The logic of political survival. MIT Press.
6.
CareyS. C.ColaresiM. P.MitchellN. J. (2016). Risk mitigation, regime security, and militias: Beyond coup-proofing. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 59–72.
7.
CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L. (1999). Measuring the level, pattern, and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. International Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 407–417.
8.
CingranelliD.Fajardo-HeywardP.FilippovM. (2014). Principals, agents and human rights. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 605–630.
9.
CingranelliD. L.RichardsD. L.ClayK. C. (2014). The CIRI human rights dataset.
10.
ConradC. R.HaglundJ.MooreW. H. (2013). Disaggregating torture allegations: Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) country-year data. International Studies Perspectives, 14, 199–220.
11.
ConradC. R.HillD. W.Jr.MooreW. H. (2018). Torture and the limits of democratic institutions. Journal of Peace Research, 55(1), 3–17.
12.
ConradC. R.RitterE. H. (2019). Contentious compliance: Dissent and repression under international human rights law. Oxford University Press.
13.
CroissantA. (2018). Civil–military relations in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
14.
CurticeT. B.ArnonD. (2019). Deterring threats and settling scores: How coups influence respect for physical integrity rights. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 37, 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894219843240
15.
DavenportC. (1995). Assessing the military’s influence on political repression. JPMS: Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 23(1), 119.
16.
DavenportC. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23.
17.
DeschM. C. (1999). Civilian control of the military: The changing security environment. JHU Press.
18.
EnglehartN. A. (2009). State capacity, state failure, and human rights. Journal of Peace Research, 46(2), 163–180.
19.
FarissC. J. (2014). Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 297–318.
20.
FeaverP. D. (1999). Civil-military relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 211–241.
21.
FeaverP. D. (2003). Armed servants. Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations (pp. 16–95). Harvard University.
22.
GleditschN. P.WallensteenP.ErikssonM.SollenbergM.StrandH. (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637.
23.
GoldsteinJ. S. (1992). A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 369–385.
24.
GreeneW. (2011). Fixed effects vector decomposition: A magical solution to the problem of time-invariant variables in fixed effects models?Political Analysis, 19, 135–146.
25.
GreeneW. H. (2008). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth, 1(1), 92–250.
26.
GrewalS. (2019). Military defection during localized protests: The case of Tataouine. International Studies Quarterly, 63(2), 259–269.
27.
HadeniusA.TeorellJ. (2005). Assessing alternative indices of democracy. C&M Working Papers, IPSA.
28.
HawkinsD. G.LakeD. A.NielsonD. L.TierneyM. J. (Eds.). (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge University Press.
29.
HendrixC. S.SalehyanI. (2017). A house divided: Threat perception, military factionalism, and repression in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(8), 1653–1681.
30.
HerbstJ. (2004). African militaries and rebellion: The political economy of threat and combat effectiveness. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 357–369.
31.
HerspringD. R. (2009). Civil–military relations in the United States and Russia: An alternative approach. Armed Forces & Society, 35(4), 667–687.
32.
HerspringD. R. (2011). Creating shared responsibility through respect for military culture: The Russian and American cases. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 519–529.
33.
HerspringD. R. (2013). Civil-military relations and shared responsibility: A four-nation study. JHU Press.
34.
HillD. W.JonesZ. M. (2014). An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 661–687.
35.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Harvard University Press.
36.
JanowitzM. (1960). The professional soldier. Free Press.
37.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
38.
KenwickM. R. (2020). Self-reinforcing civilian control: A measurement-based analysis of civil-military relations. International Studies Quarterly, 64, 71–84.
39.
KiewitR.McCubbinsM. (1991). The logic of delegation Chicago. University of Chicago.
40.
LieblichE.ShinarA. (2017). The case against police militarization. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 23, 105.
41.
MateiF. C. (2012). A new conceptualization of civil–military relations. In BruneauT. C.MateiF. C. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of civil-military relations (pp. 46–58). Routledge.
42.
MeddebH. (2015). Conscription reform will shape Tunisia’s future civil-military relations. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/61704
43.
MitchellN. (2004). Agents of atrocity: Leaders, followers, and the violation of human rights in civil war. Springer.
44.
MurdieA. (2013). The bad, the good, and the ugly: The curvilinear effects of civil–military conflict on international crisis outcome. Armed Forces & Society, 39(2), 233–254.
45.
MyoeM. A. (2017). Emerging pattern of civil–military relations. Southeast Asian Affairs, 17, 259–274.
46.
NarangV.TalmadgeC. (2017). Civil-military pathologies and defeat in war: Tests using new data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62, 1379–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716684627
47.
NielsenS. C. (2005). Civil-military relations theory and military effectiveness. Public Administration and Management, 10(2), 61–84.
PilsterU.BöhmeltT.TagoA. (2016). The differentiation of security forces and the onset of genocidal violence. Armed Forces & Society, 42(1), 26–50.
50.
PoeS. C.TateC. N. (1994). Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 853–872.
PowellJ. M.ThyneC. L. (2011). Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 249–259.
53.
RaslerK. (1996). Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 61, 132–152.
54.
RisseT.RoppS. C.SikkinkK. (Eds.). (2013). The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance (Vol. 126). Cambridge University Press.
55.
SelthA. (2018). All going according to plan? The armed forces and government in Myanmar. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(1), 1–26.
56.
SimpsonA.FarrellyN. (2020). The Rohingya crisis and questions of accountability. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(5), 486–494.
57.
StokkeK.AungS. M. (2019). Transition to democracy or hybrid regime? The dynamics and outcomes of democratization in Myanmar. The European Journal of Development Research, 32, 1–20.
World Development Indicators. (2018). World development indicators. World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
