Many contemporary security issues entail the domestic military deployment, which is deemed to blur the division between armed forces and police. This argument relies on the theoretical coalescence between territory, political authority, and community. In contrast, I argue the military domestic deployment is largely grounded on the process of defining and redefining the boundaries of the community to be protected, which informs the organization of the instruments of force and is shaped throughout the process of legitimizing a particular kind of violence deployment. This article analyses the parliamentary minutes on three domestic military operations in Brazil—Operation Rio (1994), Operation Arcanjo (2010), and the Operation Rio de Janeiro (2017)—through the moral exclusion framework and shows that the debates about whether or not the armed forces should be deployed are embedded in the struggle of drawing the community’s boundaries.
AgnewJ. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.
2.
AndersonB. (2008). Comunidades imaginadas: Reflexões sobre a origem e a difusão do nacionalismo [Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Companhia das Letras.
3.
AndersonM. (1996). Frontiers: Territory and state formation in the modern world. Polity Press.
4.
AndreasP.PriceR. (2001). From war fighting to crime fighting: Transforming the American national security state. International Studies Review, 3(3), 31–52.
5.
BhambraG. K. (2015). Citizens and others: The constitution of citizenship through exclusion. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 40(2), 102–114.
6.
BigoD. (2001). The Möbius ribbon of internal and external security(ies). In AlbertM.JacobsonD.LapidY. (Eds.), Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory (p. 350). University of Minnesota Press.
7.
BigoD. (2016). Rethinking security at the crossroad of international relations and criminology. The British Journal of Criminology, 56, 1068–1086.
8.
Brasil. (1994a). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 106a Sessão. [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 106th Session]. Diário Do Congresso Do Nacional.
9.
Brasil. (1994b). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 110a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 110th Session]. Diário Do Congresso Do Nacional.
10.
Brasil. (1994c). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 111a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 111st Session]. Diário Do Congresso Do Nacional.
11.
Brasil. (1994d). Senado Federal. Ata da 142a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 142nd Session]. Diário Do Congresso Do Nacional.
12.
Brasil. (1994e). Senado Federal. Ata da 154a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 154th Session]. Diário Do Congresso Do Nacional.
13.
Brasil. (2010a). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 208a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 208th Session]. Diário Da Câmara Dos Deputados.
14.
Brasil. (2010b). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 209a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 209th Session]. Diário Da Câmara Dos Deputados.
15.
Brasil. (2010c). Senado Federal. Ata da 191a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 191st Session]. Diário Do Senado Federal.
16.
Brasil. (2017a). Senado Federal. Ata da 106a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 106th Session]. Diário Do Senado Federal.
17.
Brasil. (2017b). Senado Federal. Ata da 153a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 153rd Session]. Diário Do Senado Federal.
18.
Brasil. (2018a). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 6a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 6th Session]. Diário Da Câmara Dos Deputados.
19.
Brasil. (2018b). Câmara Dos Deputados. Ata da 10a Sessão [House of Representatives. Transcription of the 10th Session]. Diário Da Câmara Dos Deputados.
20.
Brasil. (2018c). Senado Federal. Ata da 11a Sessão [Federal Senate. Transcription of the 11th Session]. Diário Do Senado Federal.
21.
BrubakerR. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard University Press.
22.
BruneauT.MateiF. C. (2008). Towards a new conceptualization of democratization and civil-military relations. Democratization, 15(5), 909–929.
23.
CeliP. (2016). Missiones militares y roles multifuncionales: Experiencias suramericanas [Military missions and multifunctional roles: South American experiences]. In WinandÉ.RodriguesT.AguilarS. (Eds.), Defesa e segurança do atlântico sul [South Atlantic defense and security] (1st ed., Vol. 1, p. 269). Editora UFS.
24.
CroissantA.KuehnD.ChambersP.WolfS. O. (2010). Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: Conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies. Democratization, 17(5), 950–975.
25.
D’araujoM. C.CastroC. (Eds.). (2000). Democracia e Forças Armadas no Cone Sul [Democracy and Armed Forces in the Southern Cone]. Editora FGV.
26.
DiamintR. (2015). A new militarism in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 155–168.
27.
EdmundsT. (2006). What are armed forces for? The changing nature of military roles in Europe. International Affairs, 82(6), 1050–1075.
28.
ErikssonJ.RhinardM. (2009). The internal–external security nexus: Notes on an emerging research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 44(3), 243–267.
29.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
30.
FeldmanA. (2006). Securocratic wars of public safety: Globalized policing as scopic regime. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 6(3), 330–350.
31.
FergusonY. H.MansbachR. W. (1996). Political space and Westphalian states in a world of ‘polities’: Beyond inside/outside. Global Governance, 2(2), 261–287.
32.
FreundJ. (1995). Sociología del conflicto [Sociology of conflict]. Secretaría General Técnica.
33.
FriesendorfC. (2012). International intervention and the use of force: Military and police roles. DCAF (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces), p. 95.
34.
GiddensA. (2008). O Estado-Nação e a Violência [The Nation-State and Violence]. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
35.
LevyY. (2014). What is controlled by civilian control of the military? Control of the military vs. control of militarization. Armed Forces & Society, 42(1), 75–98.
36.
LópezE. (2003). Nova problemática de segurança e “novas ameaças” [New security issues and “new threats”]. In MathiasS. K.SoaresS. A. (Eds.), Novas ameaças: Dimensões e perspectivas [New threats: Dimensions and perspectives]. Sicurezza.
37.
LópezE. (2016). Atajar la sudestada [Tackling the sudestada]. In WinandÉ.AguilarS.RodriguesT. (Eds.), Defesa e segurança do atlântico sul [South Atlantic defense and security] (Vol. 1, p. 269). Editora UFS.
38.
LutterbeckD. (2005). Blurring the dividing line: The convergence of internal and external security in Western Europe. European Security, 14(2), 231–253.
39.
MandelbaumM. M. (2016). State, nation, society: The congruency fantasy and in/security of the body-national/social. Critical Studies on Security, 4(2), 187–201.
40.
MarshallT. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.
41.
MathiasS. K.GuzziA. C. (2010). Autonomia na Lei: As Forças Armadas nas constituições nacionais [Autonomy in law: Armed forces in national constitutions]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 25(73), 41–57.
42.
MathiasS. K.SoaresS. A. (Eds.). (2003). Novas ameaças: Dimensões e perspectivas [New threats: Dimensions and perspectives]. Sicurezza.
43.
MccannF. D. (2007). Soldados da pátria: História do exército brasileiro 1889-1937 [Soldiers of the Pátria: A History of the Brazilian Army, 1889-1937]. Companhia das Letras.
44.
MearsheimerJ. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.
MoreiraV. M. L. (2017). Guerra, pacificação e sujeição: O nascimento da ‘escola severa’ de ‘civilização dos ínidos’ [War, pacification and subjection: The birth of the ‘escola severa’ of ‘civilization of the native’]. In Pacificar o Brasil: Das guerras justas às UPPs [Pacifying Brazil: From just wars to UPPs] (pp. 126–147). Alameda Casa Editorial.
49.
NordenD. (2016). Latin American militaries in the 21st century: Civil-military relations in the era of disappearing boundaries. In MaresD.KacowiczA. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Latin American security. Routledge.
50.
OjoE. (2008). New missions and roles of the military forces: The blurring of military and police roles in Nigeria. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 11(1), 1–18.
OliveiraE. R. (1994). De Geisel a collor: Forças Armadas, Transição e democracia [From Geisel to Collor: Armed Forces, Transition and Democracy]. Papirus Editora.
53.
OpotowS. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20.
54.
PaasiA. (2009). Bounded spaces in a ‘borderless world’: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power, 2(2), 213–234.
55.
PearceJ. (2010). Perverse state formation and securitized democracy in Latin America. New Patterns of Militarized Violence and Coercion in the Americas, 17(2), 286–306.
56.
Pion-BerlinD. (2016). Military missions in democratic Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
Pion-BerlinD.MartínezR. (2017). Soldiers, politicians, and civilians. Cambridge University Press.
58.
Pion-BerlinD.TrinkunasH. (2011). Latin America’s growing security gap. Journal of Democracy, 22(1), 39–53.
59.
RaeH. (2003). State identities and the homogenisation of peoples. Cambridge University Press.
60.
RamalhoA. J. (2018). Relaciones cívico-militares en Brasil: los retos del sector defensa y el rol de los militares en la sociedad brasileña contemporánea [Civil-military relations in Brazil: the challenges of the defense sector and the role of the military in contemporary Brazilian society]. In FreerJ.IllaresM.De la TorreA.PastranaE.EnríquezD.RamalhoA.SánchezJ.VeraD. (Eds.), El nuevo rol de las fuerzas armadas en Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú [The new role of the armed forces in Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru] (pp. 11–44). Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
61.
RodriguesT. (2016). Narcotráfico, Militarização e Pacificações: Novas securitizações no Brasil [Drug trafficking, militarization and pacification: New securitizations in Brazil]. In FuccilleA.Dos PassosR. D. F (Eds.), Visões do Sul: Crise e transformações do sistema internacional [Visions of the South: Crisis and changes in the international system] (Vol. 2, pp. 55–87). Cultura Acadêmica.
62.
RouquiéA. (1984). O Estado militar na América Latina [The military and the state in Latin America] (Vol. 16). Alfa-Omega.
63.
RuggieJ. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.
64.
SackR. D. (1986). Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge University Press.
65.
SainM. F. (2001). Las «nuevas amenazas» y las Fuerzas Armadas en la Argentina de los ‘90 [The “new threats” and the armed forces in Argentina in the ’90]. Presented at the XXIII International Congress Latin American Studies Association (LASA).
66.
Saint-PierreH. L. (2011). ‘Defesa’ ou ‘Segurança’? Reflexões em torno de conceitos e ideologias [‘Defense’ or ‘Security’? Reflections on concepts and ideologies]. Contexto Internacional, 33(2), 407–433.
67.
Saint-PierreH. L. (2015). Breve reflexión sobre el empleo de las Fuerzas Armadas [Brief reflection on the employment of the Armed Forces]. Voces En El Fénix, 48.
68.
Saint-PierreH. L. (Ed.). (2007). Controle civil sobre os militares e política de defesa na Argentina, no Brasil e no Uruguai [Civilian control over the military and defense policy in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay]. Editora Unesp.
69.
SampóC. (2019). ¿Entre la tradición y la modernización? El avance del crimen organizado y las fuerzas armadas en Argentina (2008-2018) [Between tradition and modernization? The advance of organized crime and the armed forces in Argentina (2008-2018)]. In AldaS.SampóC. (Eds.), La transformación de las Fuerzas Armadas en América Latina ante el crimen organizado [The transformation of the Armed Forces in Latin America in the face of organized crime] (pp. 107–128). Centro de Estudios Estratégicos Ejército del Perú Real Instituto Elcano.
70.
SantillánJ. F. (1997). Norberto Bobbio: El filósofo y la política: Antología [Norberto Bobbio: The Philosopher and the Politics: Anthology]. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
71.
Senado Federal. (2017). Comissão de relações exteriores e defesa nacional. 20a reunião extraordinária. audiência pública interativa: Debater questões ligadas a soberania nacional e aos projetos estratégicos do Exército do Brasil [Foreign Affairs and National Defense Commission. 20th extraordinary session. Public hearing: Debate issues related to national sovereignty and Brazilian Army strategic projects]. Retrieved June 17, 2020, fromhttps://legis.senado.leg.br/comissoes/audiencias?6&codcol=54
72.
SouzaA. B. de. (2017). Mito de estado, estado é: Duque de caxias e as práticas pacificadoras do exército imperial [Myth of state, state is: Duque de Caxias and the Imperial Army practices of pacification]. In Pacificar o Brasil: Das guerras justas às UPPs [Pacifying Brazil: From just wars to UPPs] (pp. 175–195). Alameda Casa Editorial.
73.
SouzaA. B. deSilvaA. M. D. DaMoraesL. E. De S.ChirioM. (Eds.). (2017). Pacificar o Brasil: Das guerras justas às UPPs [Pacifying Brazil: From just wars to UPPs]. Casa Editorial.
74.
WalbyS. (2003). The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era. Sociology, 37(3), 529–546.
75.
WalkerR. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
76.
WaltzK. (2002). Teoria das relações internacionais [Theory of International Politics]. Gradiva.
77.
WalzerM. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.
78.
WeissT. (2011). The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), 396–405.
79.
WilmerF. (2002). The social construction of man, the state, and war: Identity, conflict, and violence in former Yugoslavia. Routledge.
80.
WilmerF.MansbachR. W. (2001). War, violence, and the Westphalian state system as a moral community. In LapidY.JacobsonD.AlbertM. (Eds.), Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory (pp. 51–72). University of Minnesota Press.
81.
WinandÉ.RodriguesT.AguilarS. (Eds.). (2016). Defesa e Segurança do Atlântico Sul: VIII ENABED [Defense and Security of the South Atlantic: VIII ENABED]. Editora UFS.
82.
ZaverucchaJ. (2008). La militarización de la seguridad pública en Brasil [The militarization of public security in Brazil]. Nueva Sociedad, 213, 128–146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
