Traditionally, the military is seen as an unequivocally authoritarian organization. With survey data collected at the Royal Danish Military Academy, this study shows that that is a qualified truth. Thus, cadets enrolled directly from the noncommissioned officer corps—those most acquainted with the norms of the armed forces—do not weigh authoritarian leadership values over nonauthoritarian ones. Instead, their view reflects that for the experienced leader, the context, and not overt ideals, enables them to choose the leadership tools they expect will prove most effective. On the contrary, cadets enrolled based on their civilian merits clearly prioritize authoritarian values. This is particularly true among cadets returning to the military after a break, former professionals, and former draftees alike. Their view also reflects experience, but a different kind of experience, as they have primarily encountered the military hierarchy from the receiving end.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
2.
BelasenA.FrankN. (2012). Women’s leadership: Using the competing values framework to evaluate the interactive effects of gender and personality traits on leadership roles. International Journal of Leadership studies, 7(2), 192–215.
3.
CameronK. (1981). Construct space and subjectivity problems in organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5(2), 105–121.
4.
Chief of Defense. (1982, June1). Leadership principles for the defense forces. CHOD DEN DIR P.140.3.
DruckerP. F. (2006). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. Harper Collins Publishers. (Original work published 1967)
7.
FriedsonE. (1999). Theory of professionalism: Method and substance. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 9(1), 117–129.
8.
HargraveT. J.Van de VenA. H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 319–339.
9.
HellriegelD.SlocumJ. W.JrWoodmanR. W.. (1995). Organizational behavior (7th ed.). West Publishing.
10.
HolstingV. S. (2017). Militært chefvirke: Kritik og retfærdiggørelse mellem politik og profession[Military commandship: Critique and justification between politics and profession] [PhD dissertation]. (PhD Series, No. 32-2017). Copenhagen Business School.
11.
HuntJ.FitzgeraldM. (2018). Styles of leadership. In MuenjohnN.McMurrayA.FernandoM. (Eds.), Leadership: Global and regional perspectives (pp. 62–98). Cambridge University Press.
12.
HuntingtonS. P. (1985). The soldier and the state. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1957)
13.
JakobsenP. V.RingsmoseJ. (2015). In Denmark, Afghanistan is worth dying for: How public support for the war was maintained in the face of mounting casualties and elusive success. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(2), 211–227.
14.
JansenM. M.BrænderM.MoelkerR. (2019). What sets the officer apart? Dutch and Danish educational reforms leading to the habitus of the thinking soldier. In KlinkertW.BollenM.JansenM.de JongH.KramerE. H.VosL. (Eds.), NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2019 (pp. 337–353). Asser Press.
15.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 6(48), 535–549.
16.
JohnsonB. (2014). Reflections: A perspective on paradox and its applications to modern management. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 206–212.
17.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
18.
LavineM. (2014). Paradoxical leadership and the competing values framework. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 189–205.
19.
LeisinkP.SteijnB. (2008). Recruitment, attraction, and selection. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 118–133). Oxford University Press.
20.
LewisM. W.SmithW. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 1–23.
MoskosC. C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces & Society, 4(1), 41–50.
23.
MoskosC. C.WoodF. R. (1988). The military—More than just a job?Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publishers.
24.
O’NeillM.QuinnR. E. (1993). Editors’ note: Applications of the competing values framework. Human Resource Management, 33(1), 1–7.
25.
PandeyS. J.DavisR. S.PandeyS.PengS. (2016). The transformational leadership and the use of normative public values: Can employees be inspired to serve larger public purposes?Public Administration, 1(94), 204–222.
26.
PedersenJ. J. (1979). Leadership and cooperation training in the defence [Forsvarets ledelses- og samarbejdstræning]. (Whitepaper). Chief of the Army Periods of Orientation, 1979-I & IINOV 1979.
27.
PorsdamH. (2005). From pax Americana to lex Americana: American legal and cultural hegemony. In MacmillanF. (Ed.), New directions in copyright law (pp. 91–107). Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.
29.
QuinnR. E. (1988). Beyond rational leadership: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
30.
QuinnR. E.FaermanS. R.ThompsonM. P.McGrathM. R. (2003). Becoming a master manager. A competency framework. John Wiley & Sons.
31.
QuinnR. E.McGrathM. R. (1982). Moving beyond the single-solution perspective: The competing values approach as a diagnostic tool. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(4), 463–472.
32.
QuinnR. E.RohrbaughJ. (1981). A competing values approach to organization effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5(2), 122–140.
33.
QuinnR. E.RohrbaughJ. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Leadership Science, 29(3), 363–377.
RubinA. (1985). Significance testing with population data. Social Service Review, 3(59), 518–520.
36.
SarvasS.HodnyJ. (1998). The motivation to become an officer. In CaforioG. (Ed.), The European cadet: Professional socialisation in military academies (pp. 11–25). Nomos.
37.
SchneiderB. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 1–31.
SmithW. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.
40.
StahlM.McNicholsC.ManleyR. (1980). An empirical examination of the moskos institution-occupation model. Armed Forces & Society, 6(2), 257–269.
41.
TreschT. S.MoelkerR.CaforioG. (2007). The Methodological Approach of the Study on the Differences between Civilian Students and Military Cadets. In CaforioG. (Ed.), Cultural Differences between the Military and Parent Society in Democratic Countries: Vol. 4. Contributions to conflict management, peace economics and development (pp. 21–48). Emerald Group Publishing.
42.
van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
43.
VandenabeeleW. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2(34), 153–173.
44.
VinceR.AbbeyG.LangenhanM.BellD., (2018). Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(1), 86–106.
45.
WoodruffT.KeltyR.SegalD. R. (2006). Propensity to serve and motivation to enlist among American combat soldiers. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 353–366.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
