Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This short article answers the question of whether, in the context of current American civil–military relations, senior military professionals may loyally dissent from a decision by civilian authorities, even including by resignation. Stated another way, can their constitutional duties to obedience to civilian authority ever clash so severely with their responsibilities to their profession and its fiduciary trust with the American people that dissent is obligated. The position offered here is that senior military professionals always retain the moral agency for such dissent. It inheres in their role as a steward of an American military profession exercising the discretionary judgments that are the moral core of their professional work.

Keywords

civil–military relations military professions professional military ethic loyal dissent principled resignation resignation in protest

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Abbott

(2002). The army and the theory of professions. In Snider

D. M.

Watkins

(Eds.), The future of the army profession (pp. 523–536). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Army Doctrinal Reference Publication 1. (2015). The army profession. Washington DC: Headquarters Department of the Army.

Betts

(1977). Soldiers, statesmen and cold war crises (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Betts

(1991). Soldiers, statesmen and cold war crises. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Burk

(2005). Expertise, jurisdiction, and legitimacy of the military profession. In Snider

D. M.

Matthews

L. J.

(Eds.), The future of the army profession (2nd ed., pp. 39–60). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Burk

(2010). Responsible obedience and discretion to do what is wrong. In Nielsen

S. C.

Snider

D. M.

(Eds.), American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era (pp. 149–171). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Coffman

(1991). The long shadow of the soldier and the state. Journal of Military History, 55, 69–82.

Cohen

(2002). Supreme command. New York, NY: The Free Press.

10.

Cook

(2002) Army professionalism: Service to what ends? The future of the army profession. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

11.

Cook

(2004). The moral warrior: Ethics and service in the U.S. Military. Albany: State University of New York Press.

12.

Cook

(2015). Unpublished paper presented at U.S. Army Command and Staff College Ethics Conference, Ft Leavenworth, KS. Copy in possession of author.

13.

Davidson

(1961, 12). Decentralization—A key to command effectiveness. Army Information Digest, 13–16.

14.

Feaver

(2015). The irony of civil-military relations. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9, 3–15.

15.

Freidson

(1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Freidson

(2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Golby

(2015). Beyond the resignation debate: A new framework for civil-military dialogue. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9, 18–46.

18.

Huntington

(1957). The soldier and the state. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

19.

Kitfield

(1995) Prodigal soldiers: how the generation of officers born of Vietnam revolutionized the American style of war. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

20.

Kohn

(2009). Building trust: Civil-military behaviors for effective national security. In Nielsen

S. C.

Snider

D. M.

(Eds.), American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era (pp. 264–289). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

21.

Matthews

(1990, 1). Resignation in protest. Army Magazine, pp. 12–21.

22.

Mattox

(2005). The moral foundation of army officership. In Snider

Matthews

(Eds.), The future of the army profession (2nd ed., pp. 293–312). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishers.

23.

Millett

Maslowski

(1994). For the common defense: A military history of the United States of America. New York, NY: The Free Press.

24.

Nielsen

S. C.

Snider

D. M.

(Eds.). (2009). American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

25.

Pfaff

(2005). The officer as leader of character: leadership, character, and ethical decision-making. The future of the army profession (2nd ed., pp. 153–160). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Powell

(1995). My American journey. New York, NY: Random House.

27.

Snider

D. M.

(2008). Dissent and strategic leadership of the military professions. ORBIS, 52, 256–277.

28.

Snider

D. M.

(2014). Renewing the motivational power of the army’s professional ethic Parameters, 44, 7–11.

29.

Snider

D. M.

(2015). American military professions and their ethics. In Lucas

(Ed.), Routledge handbook of military ethics (pp. 15–31). London, England: Routledge.

30.

Taylor

(1980, 12). A do-it-yourself professional code. Parameters, X(4), 10–15.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

8.22 MB

Dissent,Resignation,and the Moral Agency of Senior Military Professionals

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material