Although military and civilian personnel work closely together in defense organizations, they are subject to different human resources practices and conditions of service. Assessments of military personnel along a range of job characteristics are examined to identify areas in which they assess themselves as “better or worse off” than their civilian counterparts, and how these comparisons relate to perceptions of fairness using data from Belgium, Canada, and the Netherlands. Military personnel reported meaningfulness/support aspects (e.g., meaningful work) as similar for military and civilian personnel, indicated that negative impacts (e.g., risk of injury) were greater for military, and perceived variability in instrumental benefits (e.g., pay, advancement). Upward social comparison (i.e., seeing oneself as worse off) was related to lower perceived fairness, whereas downward social comparison was related to higher perceived fairness. This research informs mechanisms for promoting perceptions of fairness and enhancing military–civilian personnel relations in defense establishments.
AbbotA. (2002). The army and the theory of professions. In SniterD.WatkinsG. (Eds.), The future of the army profession (pp. 523–536). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.
3.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 67–299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
AllenC. D.BraunW. G. (2013). Trust: Implications for the Army Profession. Military Review, Sept-Oct (2013), 73–85.
5.
AmbroseM. L.HarlandL. K.KulikC. T. (1991). Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 239–246. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.2.239
6.
AmbroseM. L.KulikC. T. (1989). The influence of social comparisons on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 129–138. doi:10.1007/bf01023043
7.
AmbroseM. L.SchminkeM. (2009). The role of overall justice judgements in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500. doi:10.1037/a0013203
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BushmanB. J. (2008). Social psychology and human nature, brief (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9.
BiscopS. (2011, 12). Belgian Defence Policy: The fight goes on (Security Policy Brief no. 32). Brussels, Belgium: EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations.
10.
BremnerN.GoldenergI. (2015). Social comparisons in military and civilian personnel: Psychometric analysis and factor structure. Manuscript in preparation.
11.
BrownD. J.FerrisD. L.HellerD.KeepingL. M. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 59–75. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003
12.
BuunkA. P.GibbonsF. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 3–21. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.007
13.
BuunkB. P.ZurriagaR.PeiroJ. M.NautaA.GosalvezI. (2005). Social comparison at work as related to a cooperative social climate and to individual differences in social comparison orientation. Applied Psychology, 54, 61–80. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00196.x
14.
CohnL. (2013). Who will serve? Labour markets and military personnel policy. Res Militaris, 3, 1–26.
15.
ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-010.86.3.386
16.
ColquittJ. A.WessonM. J.PorterC. O. L. H.ConlonD. E.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425
17.
CropanzanoR.BowenD. E.GillilandS. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34–48. doi:10.5465/amp.2007.27895338
18.
CropanzanoR.ByrneZ. S.BobocelD. R.RuppD. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness, heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of overall fairness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164–209. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
19.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
FrancisL.BarlingJ. (2005). Organizational injustice and psychological strain. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 250–261. doi:10.1037/h0087260
21.
GoldenbergI. (2011). Canadian Forces Retention Survey: Perceptions of organizational fairness, work and organizational cynicism, and organizational commitment [Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Technical Memorandum, 2011-006]. Ottawa: Defence Research and Development Canada.
22.
GoldenbergI. (2014, 04). International comparative research. Presented at the 5th meeting of the NATO STO RTG 226, Berlin, Germany.
23.
GoldenbergI.SchiffR. (2014, 06). Different cultures—One mandate: The integration of military and civilian personnel within defence organizations. Presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Research Committee on Armed Forces and Society, Yokohama, Japan.
24.
GreenbergJ. (2001). Setting the justice agenda: Seven unanswered questions about “what, why, and how.”Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58, 210–219.
25.
HusermanR. C.HatfieldJ. D.MilesE. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. The Academy of Management Review, 12, 222–234.
26.
KeltyR. (2008). The U.S. Navy’s maiden voyage: Effects of integrating sailors and civilian mariners on deployment. Armed Forces & Society, 34, 536–564. doi:10.1177/0095327x07312088
27.
KeltyR.SegalD. R. (2007). The civilianization of the U.S. military: Army and Navy case studies of the effects of civilian integration on military personnel. In JägerT.KümmelG. (Eds.), Private military and security companies: Chances, problems, pitfalls and prospects (pp. 213–239). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
28.
KimT. Y.LeungK. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall organizational fairness perception: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 83–95. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004
29.
LamertzK. (2002). The social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 19–37. doi:10.1002/job.128
30.
LindE. A.LissakR. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19–29. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90003-4
31.
ManigartP. (1998). L’opinion publique belge et la politique de défense. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, N° 1595.
32.
MastersonS. S.LewisK.GoldmanB. M.TaylorM. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748. doi:10.2307/1556364
33.
NATO Science and Technology Organization. (2015). Civilian and military personnel work culture and relations in defence organizations. Human Factors and Medicine Panel Research Task Group (NATO STO HFM RTG-226). Retrieved fromhttp://www.cso.nato.int/activities.aspx?RestrictPanel=2
34.
PennelB.LevensteinR.LeeH. J. (2011). Data collection. In Guidelines for best practices in cross-cultural surveys (pp. XII 1–XII 65). Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
35.
PettigrewT. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory: Convergences and applications. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
36.
PettigrewT. F. (2015). Samuel Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 7–24.
37.
ShahP. P. (1998). Who are employees’ social referents? Using a network perspective to determine referent others. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 249–268. doi:10.2307/256906
38.
SpenceJ. R.FerrisD. L.BrownD. J.HellerD. (2011). Understanding daily citizenship behaviors: A social comparison perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 547–571. doi:10.1002/job.738
39.
StoufferS. A.SuchmanE. A.DeVinneyC. C.StarrS. A.WilliamsR. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment to army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
SulsJ.WheelerL. (2000). A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. In SulsJ.WheelerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Plenum.
41.
Survey Research Center. (2011). Guidelines for best practices in cross-cultural surveys. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
42.
SuurdC. D. (2009). A test of the relationships among the justice facets, overall justice, strain, and turnover intent in a military context [Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Technical Memorandum 2009-017]. Ottawa: Defence Research and Development Canada.
43.
TepperB. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational injustice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 197–215. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2951
44.
WheelerL.MiyakeK. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760–773. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.760
45.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
46.
WongL.GerrasS. J. (2015). Lying to ourselves: Dishonesty in the army profession. Carlisle Barracks, PA: United States Army War College Press.
47.
Zapata-PhelanC. P.ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LivingstonB. (2009). Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.08.001
