Epilogue: Theoretical and Comparative Notes on Reserve Forces

Abstract

This concluding epilogue places the individual studies presented in the special volume in wider perspective. The importance of studying reserve forces centers on (1) their centrality in missions carried out by the militaries of the contemporary industrial democracies and (2) their unique cultural and organizational characteristics. Concretely, reserve components are a foundation for the legitimacy of the military, yet are often a source for criticism of missions; they provide a ready pool of manpower but one that is sometimes expensive; their skills are sometimes needed but their military abilities do not always meet the perceived standards of standing forces’ professionals. Research into this military group that is situated between the military and civil society clarifies not only the interlinkages between these spheres but also their dynamic and contextual nature.

Keywords

reserve forces organization comparative analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kristina Spohr-Readman , ed., Building Sustainable and Effective Military Capabilities: A Systematic Comparison of Professional and Conscript Forces (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004).

Nir Gazit and Edna Lomksy-Feder , ‘‘Reserve Soldiers as Transmigrants: Moving Between the Civilian and Military Worlds,’’ Armed Forces & Society 34, no. 4 (2008): 593-614.

Stephen M. Duncan , Citizen Warriors: America’s National Guard and Reserve Forces and the Politics of National Security (Novato, CA: Presidio, 1997).

Terry C. Willett , ‘‘The Military Infra-Structure of Contemporary Canada: The Case of the Militia,’’ in Supplementary Military Forces: Reserves, Militias, Auxiliaries, ed. Louis A. Zurcher and Gwyn Harries-Jenkins ( Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1978), 121-142.

Sam C. Sarkesian and Robert E. Connor , The US Military Profession into the Twenty-First Century: War, Peace and Politics (London: Pluto Press, 1999); Stephen M. Duncan , Citizen Warriors: America’s National Guard and Reserve Forces and the Politics of National Security ( Novato, CA: Presidio, 1997); Charles Moskos , Soldiers and Sociology (Washington, DC: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences , 1988).

Sara Helman , ‘‘Militarism and the Construction of Community,’’ Journal of Political and Military Sociology 25 (1997): 305-32.

Anthony Bennell , ‘‘European Reserve Forces: England, France and West Germany,’’ in Supplementary Military Forces, ed. Zurcher and Harries-Jenkins (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982), 39-68.

Lomsky-Feder et al. ‘‘Transmigrants.’’

J. Griffith , ‘‘Will Citizens be Soldiers? Examining Retention of Reserve Component Soldiers,’’ Armed Forces & Society 31, no. 3 (2005): 353-83.

10.

Yagil Levy , The Other Army of Israel: Materialist Militarism in Israel (Tel Aviv, Israel, 2003; Hebrew); Yagil Levy, ‘‘Social Convertibility and Militarism: Evaluations of the Development of Military Society Relations in Israel in the Early 2000s,’’ Journal of Political and Military Sociology 31, 1 ( 2003): 71-96.

11.

Dan Horowitz and Baruch Kimmerling , ‘‘Some Social Implications of Military Service and the Reserves System in Israel,’’ Archives European de Sociologie, 15 ( 1974): 262-76.

12.

Yagil Levy , ‘‘The Second Lebanon War: From Republican Control to Market Control over the Military.’’ Democracy and Security 4, no. 1 (2008): 48-68.

13.

A. Forster , ‘‘Breaking the Covenant: Governance of the British Army in the Twenty-First Century,’’ International Affairs 82, no. 6 (2006): 1043-1057.

14.

Odyssey Zone , The Psychological Contract (2006 ). http://www.odysseyzone.com/Articles/Thepsychologicalcontract/tabid/95 .

15.

Yagil Levy , E. Lomsky-Feder , and Noa Harel , ‘‘From ‘Obligatory Militarism’ to ‘Contractual Militarism,’’’ Israel Studies 12, no. 1 (2007): 127-48.