High percentage of non-rubbers in Skim Natural Rubber (SNR) has restricted its use in manufacture of advanced rubber products. SNR were melt blended with polypropylene (PP) at different blend ratios to generate thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs). Standard Lanka Rubber (SLR) and PP blends were also prepared for the purpose of comparison. Tensile, hysteresis, hardness, water absorption, and dynamic mechanical properties of unvulcanized (UV) and dynamically vulcanized (DV) SNR/PP and SLR/PP blends were compared. Stress-strain behavior and TPE characteristics of both blends were similar. Tensile strength and modulus of SNR/PP blends decreased with the increase of SNR percentage. Elongation at break showed a decrease in UV blends and maxima at 50:50 blend ratio for DV blends. Dynamic vulcanization of the rubber phase improved tensile properties and hardness of the blends. Water absorption studies showed significantly higher equilibrium moisture content in SNR/PP blends, while difference in this property diminished with the increase of rubber phase. Water absorption and equilibrium moisture content decreased with dynamic vulcanization of rubber phase. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed multi-phase microstructure of the blends. Both blend systems showed similar dynamic mechanical properties and almost comparable thermo-mechanical properties confirming the potential of SNR as an alternative to SLR for selected applications.
RippelMMLeeLTLeiteCAP, et al.Skim and cream natural rubber particles: colloidal properties, coalescence and film formation. J Colloid Interface Sci2003; 268(2): 330–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.07.046.
3.
AlexRNahC. Preparation and characterization of organoclay-rubber nanocomposites via a new route with skim natural rubber latex. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 102(4): 3277–3285. DOI: 10.1002/app.24738.
SenevirathneWMGNugawelaATillekeratneLMK. Handbook of Rubber - processing technology. Agalawatta, Sri Lanka: Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, 2003, pp. 0–200. ISBN: 955-9022-06-7.
6.
ArdnaBTTamuraHFuruikeT. Improving deproteinized skim natural rubber latex with a further leaching process, Eng Appl Sci Res, 2019, 46(1), 64–71. ISSN: 2539–6161.
7.
KeawmuangkhamSSriringMRojruthaiP, et al.Improvement of recovery and purification method of the rubber from skim natural rubber latex, In: Proceedings of the pure and applied chemistry international conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 19 January 2017, 1520–1524.
8.
PaiphansiriUTangboriboonratP. Prevulcanisation of skim latex: morphology and its use in natural rubber based composite material. Colloid Polym Sci2005; 284: 251–257. DOI: 10.1007/s00396-0051361-y.
9.
DanwanichakulDRattanaphanOSrisatjangJ, et al.Extraction of protein from skim natural rubber latex using PEG as a surfactant via low speed centrifugation and continuous flow. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131(4): 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/app.39900.
10.
GeorgeKMAlexRJosephS, et al.Characterization of enzyme-deproteinized skim rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 114(5): 3319–3324. DOI: 10.1002/app.30642.
11.
BukitNGintingEMPardedeIS, et al.Mechanical properties of composite thermoplastic hdpe/natural rubber and palm oil boiler ash as a filler. In: The 8th international conference on theoritical and applied physics, Medan City, Indonesia, 20-21 September 2018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012003.
12.
ChandranNSarathchandranCJoseS, et al.Organic modifier induced interfacial transformation, morphology and physico-mechanical properties of PP/NR based blend nanocomposites. Compos B Eng2020; 194: 108045.
13.
FletesRCVLópezEOCGudinoPO, et al.Ground tire rubber/polyamide 6 thermoplastic elastomers produced by dry blending and compression molding. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl2021; 38: 38–55. DOI: 10.1177/14777606211038956.
14.
SaebMRWiśniewskaPSusikA, et al.GTR/thermoplastics Blends: how do interfacial interactions govern processing and physico-mechanical properties. Mater2022; 15(3): 841. DOI: 10.3390/ma15030841.
15.
BicyKRouxelDPoncotM, et al.Interfacial tuning and designer morphologies of microporous membranes based on polypropylene/natural rubber nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138(41): 51208.
16.
KaneSNMishraADuttaAK. Preface: international conference on recent trends in physics (ICRTP 2016), J Phys Conf Ser2016; 755(1); 011001. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001.
17.
NairSTVijayan PPGeorgeSC, et al.Enhanced mechanical and thermal performance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes-filled polypropylene/natural rubber thermoplastic elastomers. New J Chem2021; 45(11): 4963–4976. DOI: 10.1039/DONJ05437B.
18.
SiregarAHMuisYDaulayDS. Preparation of thermoplastic elastomer from polypropylene-sir 10 rubber blends with addition of dicumil peroxide as initiator and divinylbenzene as a crosslinker. J Chem and Chem Eng2012; 6(12): 1099–1105.
19.
MohamadNNur SharafinaZAb MaulodH, et al.Morphological and mechanical properties of polypropylene/epoxidized natural rubber thermoplastic vulcanizates treated with maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene, Int J Automot Mech Eng, 2013, 8, 1305–1315. ISSN: 2180–1606.
20.
ThitithammawongANoordermeerJWMKaesamanA, et al.Influence of compatibilizers on the rheological, mechanical, and morphological properties of epoxidized natural rubber/polypropylene thermoplastic vulcanizates. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 107: 2436–2443. DOI: 10.1002/app.27233.
21.
BenmesliSRiahiF. Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of a chemically modified polypropylene/natural rubber thermoplastic elastomer blend. Polym Test2014; 36: 54–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.016.
22.
NakasonCWorleeASalaehS. Effect of vulcanization systems on properties and recyclability of dynamically cured epoxidized natural rubber/polypropylene blends. Polym Test2008; 27: 858–869. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.06.011.
23.
BendjaouahdouCBensaadS. The effects of organoclay on the morphology and balance properties of an immiscible polypropylene/natural rubber blend. Energy Procedia2013; 36: 574–590. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.066.
24.
PurushothamanEAl MinathM. Natural rubber/engineering thermoplastic elastomer blends. In: ThomasS, et al. (eds). Nat Rubber Mater2013; Ch. 11: 265–283. ISBN: 978-1-84973-610-7. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
25.
PassadorFRAlzate RojasGJPessanLA. Thermoplastic elastomers based on natural rubber/polypropylene blends: effect of blend ratios and dynamic vulcanization on rheological, thermal, mechanical, and morphological properties. J Macromol Sci B2013; 52(8): 1142–1157. DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2012.756323.
WiwattananukulRFanBYamaguchiM. Improvement of rigidity for rubber-toughened polypropylene via localization of carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2017; 141: 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.012.
29.
SharikaTAbrahamJArif PM, et al.Excellent electromagnetic shield derived from MWCNT reinforced NR/PP blend nanocomposites with tailored microstructural properties. Compos B: Eng2019; 173(3): 106798. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.009.
30.
LopattananonNWalongASakaiT. Influence of incorporation methods of ATH on microstructure, elastomeric properties, flammability, and thermal decomposition of dynamically vulcanized NR/PP blends. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135(18): 46231.
31.
AbidinNZWahabMKA. The effect of polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride on the polypropylene/natural rubber blends filled with cyperus odoratus. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 957: 012020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/957/1/012020.
32.
WijewardaneDSSensvirathnaMASRSiriwardenaS, et al.Preparation of skim natural rubber and polypropylene blends via melt blending: a study on processability. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl2022; 38(2): 147776062211052. DOI: 10.1177/14777606221105293.
33.
ChoudhuryNRBhowmickAK. Influence of interaction promoter on the properties of thermoplastic elastomeric blends of natural rubber and polyethylene. J Mater Sci1988; 23(6): 2187–2194. DOI: 10.1007/BF01115787.
34.
MagioliMSirqueiraASSoaresBG. The effect of dynamic vulcanization on the mechanical, dynamic mechanical and fatigue properties of TPV based on polypropylene and ground tire rubber. Polym Test2010; 29(7): 840–848. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.07.008.
35.
MadkourTMHagagFMMamdouhW, et al.Molecular-level modeling and experimental investigation into the high performance nature and low hysteresis of thermoplastic polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf)2012; 53(25): 5788–5797. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.041.
36.
PengTLvFGongZ, et al.Design of PP/EPDM/NBR TPVs with tunable mechanical properties via regulating the core-shell structure. Polym Test2020; 90(July): 106767. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106767.
Sae-OuiPSirisinhaCSa-nguanthammarongP, et al.Properties and recyclability of thermoplastic elastomer prepared from natural rubber powder (NRP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE). Polym Test2010; 29(3): 346–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.010.
39.
PongdongWKummerlöweCVennemannN, et al.Property correlations for dynamically cured rice husk ash filled epoxidized natural rubber/thermoplastic polyurethane blends: influences of RHA loading. Polym Test2016; 53: 245–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.05.026.
40.
HazwanSMKaharAWM. Effects of dynamic vulcanization on properties of polypropylene/natural rubber/thermoplastic starch blends. Solid State Phenom2018; 280: 251–257. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.280.251.
41.
MohamadNZainolNSRahimFF, et al.Mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene/epoxidized natural rubber blends at various mixing ratio. Procedia Eng2013; 68: 439–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.204.
42.
SriringMNimpaiboonAKumarnS, et al.Enhancing viscoelastic and mechanical performances of natural rubber through variation of large and small rubber particle combinations. Polym Test2020; 81: 106225. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106225.
43.
IsmailHSuryadiansyah. Thermoplastic elastomers based on polypropylene/natural rubber and polypropylene/recycle rubber blends. Polym Test2002; 21(4): 389–395. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00101-5.
44.
BendjaouahdouCBensaadS. Aging studies of a polypropylene and natural rubber blend. Int J Ind Chem2018; 9(4): 345–352. DOI: 10.1007/s40090-018-0163-2.
45.
RapaMGrosuEGhiocaPN, et al.Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene random copolymer and triblock copolymer blends. Mater Plast2016; 53(1): 68–72. ISSN: 0025–5289.
46.
PongtanayutKThongpinCSantawiteeO. The effect of rubber on morphology, thermal properties and mechanical properties of PLA/NR and PLA/ENR blends. Energy Procedia2013; 34: 888–897. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.826.
47.
HalimatuddahlianaIHIsmailH. Thermoplastic elastomer based on PP/EPDM/ENR25 and PP/EPDM/NR blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng2004; 43(2): 357–368. DOI: 10.1081/PPT-120029968.
48.
GorceJ ‐NHellgethJWWardTC. Mechanical hysteresis of a polyether polyurethane thermoplastic elastomer. Polym Eng Sci1993; 33(18): 1170–1176. DOI: 10.1002/pen.760331804.
49.
WuHTianMZhangL, et al.Effect of rubber nanoparticle agglomeration on properties of thermoplastic vulcanizates during dynamic vulcanization. Polymers (Basel)2016; 8(4): 127–212. DOI: 10.3390/polym8040127.
50.
NakasonCSaiwariSKaesamanA. Thermoplastic vulcanizates based on maleated natural rubber/polypropylene blends: effect of blend ratios on rheological, mechanical, and morphological properties. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46(5): 594–600. DOI: 10.1002/pen.20498.
51.
PandeyAKSetuaDK. Study of damping behavior of rubber-plastic blend. Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe-Rubber Point2006; 59(1-2): 45–48. ISSN: 0948–3276.
52.
PichaiyutSNakasonCWisunthornS. Biodegradability and thermal properties of novel natural rubber/linear low density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch ternary blends. J Polym Environ2018; 26(7): 2855–2866. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-017-1174-3.
53.
HomkhiewCRawangwongSBoonchouytanW, et al.Composites from thermoplastic natural rubber reinforced rubberwood sawdust: effects of sawdust size and content on thermal, physical, and mechanical properties. Int J Polym Sci2018; 2018: 1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7179527.
54.
PopescuRCPopescuDGrumezescuAM. Applications of rubber-based blends (recent developments in polymer macro, micro and nano blends: preparation and characterisation). Applications of rubber-based blends. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 75–109. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100408-1.00004-2.
55.
NguyenDMDoTVVGrilletAC, et al.Biodegradability of polymer film based on low density polyethylene and cassava starch. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation2016; 115: 257–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.004.
56.
MochaneMJMokhenaTCMokhothuTH, et al.Recent progress on natural fiber hybrid composites for advanced applications; a review. Express Polym Lett2019; 13(2): 159–198. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.15.
57.
ShoemakerJ. Moldflow design guide: a resource for plastics engineers. In Moldflow design guide. Framingham, MA: Hanser, Moldflow Corporation, 2006. DOI: 10.3139/9783446418547.
58.
CaoXVIsmailHRashidAA, et al.Maleated natural rubber as a coupling agent for recycled high density polyethylene/natural rubber/kenaf powder biocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng2012; 51(9): 904–910. DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2012.671425.
59.
LendvaiL. A novel preparation method of polypropylene/natural rubber blends with improved toughness. Polym Int2021; 70(3): 298–307. DOI: 10.1002/pi.6133.
60.
IshakZAMYowBNNGBL, et al.Hygrothermal aging and tensile behavior of injection-molded rice husk-filled polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci2001; 81(3): 742–753. DOI: 10.1002/app.1491.
