The effect of different crosslink structures was studied in nanocomposites obtained by co-precipitation of natural rubber (NR) latex and aqueous solution of cellulose xanthate for obtaining nanocellulose. Cure systems characterized as conventional (CV), semi-efficient (SEV), and efficient (EV) were used in compositions of NR and also in natural rubber/cellulose (NR/CEL) nanocompositions with 15 phr of cellulose. The characterization of the developed compositions was based on rheological, physical-mechanical, aging, and mechanical properties. The obtained results allowed the conclusion that cellulose is a reinforcing filler as it promoted a significant increase in all these properties, that were sensitive to the cure systems used and protects NR from accelerated aging. The experimental results are presented and discussed also by Payne effect, entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) to enable an understanding on cellulose distribution throughout NR influenced by the different cure systems.
KohjiyaS. Natural rubber: from the odyssey of the hevea tree to the age of transportation. England: Smithers Rapra, 2015.
2.
MartinsAFVisconteLLYNunesRCR. Evaluation of natural rubber and cellulose II compositions by curing and mechanical properties. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst2002; 55: 637–641.
3.
KlemmDSchumannDKramerF, et al.Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. Adv Polym Sci2006; 205: 49–96.
4.
JacobMJThomasS. Cellulosic fibril–rubber nanocomposites. In: ThomasSStephenR (eds). %7Cauthor%3ARanimol++StephenRubber Nanocomposites: preparation, properties, and spplications. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 2010, pp. 197–208, https://www.wiley.com/en-vu/search?pq=%7Crelevance.
5.
SasakiMAdschiriTAraiK. Production of cellulose II from native cellulose by near and supercritical water solubilization. J Agric Food Chem2003; 51: 5376–5381.
6.
ReddyMMVivekanandhanSMisraM, et al.Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities. Prog Polym Sci2003; 38: 653–1689.
7.
OksmanK. Nanocelluloses and their use in composite materials. Express Polym Lett2012; 6: 687.
8.
SiroIPlackettD. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose2010; 17: 459–494.
9.
PeresACCNunesRCRVisconteLLY. Processo de obtenção de composições homogêneas de celulose, seus derivados e elastômeros, e suas composições - Brazilian Patent No PI 0105116-4, 2016.
10.
MartinsAFVisconteLLYSchusterRH, et al.Ageing effect on dynamic and mechanical properties of NR/Cel II nanocomposites. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst2004; 57: 446–451.
11.
NunesRCR. Natural rubber (NR) composites using cellulosic fiber reinforcements. In: KohjiyaSIkedaY (eds). Chemistry, manufacture and applications of natural rubber. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2014, pp. 284–302.
12.
MarianoRMNunesRCRVisconteLLY, et al.Efeito da hibridização de montmorilonita e celulose II sobre as propriedades mecânicas de nanocompósitos de borracha natural. Polímeros2013; 23: 123–127.
13.
LapaVLCSuarezJCMVisconteLLY, et al.Fracture behavior of nitrile rubber-cellulose II nanocomposites. J Mater Sci2007; 42: 9934–9939.
14.
ZineCLGConceiçãoAJVisconteLLY, et al. Styrene-butadiene rubber/cellulose II/clay nanocomposites prepared by cocoagulation - mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 120: 1468–1474.
15.
HongSW. Antioxidants and other protectant systems. In: RodgersB (ed). Rubber compounding chemistry and application. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2004, pp. 456–502.
16.
JosephAMGeorgeBMadhusoodananKN, et al.Current status of sulphur vulcanization and devulcanization chemistry: process of vulcanization. Rubber Sci2015; 28: 82–121.
17.
AkibaMHashimAS. Vulcanization and crosslinking in elastomers. Prog Polym Sci1997; 22: 475–521.
18.
ApremASJosephKThomasS. Recent developments in crosslinking of elastomers. Rubber Chem Technol2005; 78: 458–488.
19.
FrederickIHByrosHT. Vulcanization. In: BrendanR (ed). Rubber Compounding Chemistry and Application. 2nd ed.Florida: CRC Press; 2016, pp. 505–568.
20.
AlamMNKumarVPotiyarajP, et al.Mutual dispersion of graphite–silica binaryfillers and its effects on curing, mechanical, and aging properties of natural rubber composites. Polym Bull2021: 1–18.
21.
AlamMNMandalSKRoyK, et al.Synergism of novel thiuram disulfide and dibenzothiazyl disulfide in the vulcanization of natural rubber: curing, mechanical and aging resistance properties. Int J Ind Chem2014; 5: 1–11.
22.
MartinsAFSuarezJCMVisconteLLY, et al.Mechanical and fractographic behavior of natural rubber-cellulose II composites. J Mater Sci2003; 38: 2415–2422.
23.
NunesRCR. Rubber nanocomposites with nanocellulose. In: ThomasSMariaHJ (eds). Progress in rubber nanocomposites. Duxford; Cambridge, MA; Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd; 2016, pp. 463–494.
24.
LeblancJL. Rubber–filler interactions and rheological properties in filled compounds. Prog Polym Sci2002; 27: 627–687.
25.
DickJSHarmonCVareA. Quality assurance of natural rubber using the rubber process analyzer. Polym Test1999; 18: 327–362.
26.
ZhaoFShiXChenX, et al.Interaction of vulcanization and reinforcement of CB on dynamic property of NR characterized by RPA2000. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 117: 1168–1172.
27.
PayneAR. The dynamic properties of carbon black‐loaded natural rubber vulcanizates Part I. J Appl Polym Sci1962; 6: 57–63.
28.
FuWWangL. Variation of the payne effect in natural rubber reinforced by graft-modified carbon black. J Macromol Sci B2017; 56: 53–63.
29.
NiedermeierWFrohlichJLuginslandHD. Reinforcement mechanism in the rubber matrix by active fillers. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst2002; 55: 356–366.
30.
FloryPJRehnerJ. Statistical mechanics of cross‐linked polymer networks II. Swelling. J Chem Phys1943; 11: 521–526.
31.
FloryPJ. Principles of polymer chemistry. New York: Cornell University Press, 1953, p. 672.
PethrickRA. Polymer Yearbook 2. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1985.
34.
KrausG. Degree of cure in filler-reinforced vulcanizates by the swelling method. Rubber Chem Technol1957; 30: 67–73.
35.
MousaAKarger-KocsisJ. Rheological and thermodynamical behavior of styrene/butadiene rubber‐organoclay nanocomposites. J Macromol Mater Eng2001; 286: 260–266.
36.
López-ManchadoMHerreroBArroyoM. Preparation and characterization of organoclay nanocomposites based on natural rubber. Polym Int2003; 52: 1070–1077.
PojanavaraphanTSchiraldiDAMagaraphanR. Mechanical, rheological, and swelling behavior of natural rubber/montmorillonite aerogels prepared by freeze-drying. Appl Clay Sci2010; 50: 271–279.
39.
GhariHSJalali-AraniA. Nanocomposites based on natural rubber, organoclay and nano-calcium carbonate: Study on the structure, cure behavior, static and dynamic-mechanical properties. Appl Clay Sci2016; 119: 348–357.
40.
BarlowF. Rubber compounding principles, materials and techniques. 2nd ed.. New York: CRC Press, 1988, p. 312.
41.
KrugerFWHMcGillWJ. A study of curative interactions in cis‐1,4‐polyisoprene. VIII. Network maturing reactions in the cis‐1,4‐polyisoprene/tetramethylthiuram disulfide/ZnO system. J Appl Polym Sci1992; 45: 573–578.
42.
GradwellMHSMcGillWJ. Sulfur vulcanization of polyisoprene accelerated by benzothiazole derivatives. IV. The reaction of polyisoprene with N‐cyclohexylbenzothiazole sulfenamide, sulfur, and zinc oxide. J Appl Polym Sci1996; 61: 1515–1523.
43.
GradwellMHSMcGillWJ. The interaction of sulfenamide accelerators with sulfur, ZNO, and stearic acid in the absence of rubber. J Appl Polym Sci1994; 51: 177–185.
44.
FröhlichJNiedermeierWLuginslandHD. The effect of filler–filler and filler–elastomer interaction on rubber reinforcement. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 449–460.
45.
DattaRNHuntinkNMDattaS, et al.Rubber vulcanizates degradation and stabilization. Rubber Chem Technol2007; 80: 436–480.
46.
MarykuttyCVMathewGThomasS. Mechanical and swelling behavior of double networked natural rubber cured using a new binary accelerator system. Rubber Chem Techonol2007; 80: 809–819.
47.
AbrahamEElbiPADeepaB, et al.X-ray diffraction and biodegradation analysis of green composites of natural rubber/nanocellulose. Polym Degrad Stab2012; 97: 2378–2387.
48.
ThomasMGAbrahamEJyotishkumarP, et al.Nanocelluloses from jute fibers and their nanocomposites with natural rubber: preparation and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol2015; 81: 768–777.
49.
HwangWGWeiKHWuCM. Synergistic effect of compatibilizer in organo‐modified layered silicate reinforced butadiene rubber nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46: 80–88.
50.
AgrebiFGhorbelNBressonS, et al. Study of nanocomposites based on cellulose nanoparticles and natural rubber latex by ATR/FTIR spectroscopy: the impact of reinforcement. Polym Compos2019; 40: 2076–2087.
51.
SirisinhaKKamphunthongWSrisawatK. A comparison of natural rubber latex and polyethylene glycol as fiber carriers in melt-compounded polylactic acid/cellulose microfibril composites. J Elastom Plast2018; 50: 1–13.
52.
NairARSambhudevanSShankarB. Synthesis, characterization and dye Removal properties of cellulose nanocrystals embedded natural rubber latex Composite. Cell Chem Technol2019; 53: 263–270.
53.
JiangWShenPYiJ, et al.Surface modification of nanocrystalline cellulose and its application in natural rubber composites. J Appl Polym Sci2020; 137: 49163.
54.
KinasihNAFathurrohmanMI. Effect of curing systems on mechanical properties and npentane resistance of carbon black filled natural rubber vulcanizates. J Eng Sci Res2017; 1: 245–251.
