Multi-response optimization of the mechanical properties of PP/talc/CaCO 3 ternary nanocomposites by the response surface methodology combined with desirability function approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018
Multi-response optimization of the mechanical properties of PP/talc/CaCO 3 ternary nanocomposites by the response surface methodology combined with desirability function approach
This article was focused on the mechanical properties improvement of polypropylene (PP) by optimizing the talc, nanosized calcium carbonate (CaCO3), and maleic anhydride–grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer. For this purpose, Box–Behnken design of response surface methodology was used to obtain the best combination of additives. Based on the Box–Behnken experimental design, three levels for each factor were used; talc (0, 15, and 30 wt%), MAPP (0, 2, and 4 wt%), and CaCO3 (0, 15, and 30 wt%). The talc was found as the major factor affecting the tensile strength and modulus of PP nanocomposites, while CaCO3 was the major factor affecting the impact strength. The optimal composition of additives for maximum mechanical properties was detected to be 30 wt% talc, 16.6 wt% CaCO3, and 4 wt% MAPP. Finally, surface morphology was analyzed in detail using scanning electron microscopy to confirm the obtained results.
QiuFWangMHaoY. The effect of talc orientation and transcrystallization on mechanical properties and thermal stability of the polypropylene/talc composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 58: 7–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.011.
2.
NaffakhMPascualAMDMarcoC. Opportunities and challenges in the use of inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles to produce advanced polymer nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci2013; 38(8): 1163–1231. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.04.001.
3.
AvellaMCoscoSLorenzoMD. Nucleation activity of nanosized CaCO3 on crystallization of isotactic polypropylene, in dependence on crystal modification, particle shape, and coating. Eur Polym J2006; 42(7): 1548–1557. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.01.009.
4.
GuJXuSZhuangQ. Hyperbranched polyborosilazane and boron nitride modified cyanate ester composite with low dielectric loss and desirable thermal conductivity. IEEE Trans Dielect Elect Insul2017; 24(2): 784–790. DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2017.006299.
5.
RuanKGuoYTangY. Improved thermal conductivities in polystyrene nanocomposites by incorporating thermal reduced graphene oxide via electrospinning-hot press technique. Compos Commun2018; 10: 68–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2018.07.003.
6.
GhasemiFADaneshpayehSGhasemiI. An investigation on the Young’s modulus and impact strength of nanocomposites based on polypropylene/linear low-density polyethylene/titan dioxide (PP/LLDPE/TiO2) using response surface methodology. Polym Bull2016; 73(6): 1741–1760. DOI: 10.1007/s00289-015-1574-2.
PraditthamACharitngamNPuttajanS. Surface modified CaCO3 by palmitic acid as nucleating agents for polypropylene film: mechanical, thermal and physical properties. Energy Proc2014; 56: 264–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.157.
9.
AyazMDaneshpayehSNorooziA. Enhancing the impact and flexural strength of PP/LLDPE/TiO2/SEBS nano-composites by using Taguchi methodology. Compo Sci Technol2016; 129: 61–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.015.
10.
KhalajMJAhmadiHLesankhoshR. Study of physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene nanocomposites for food packaging application: nano-clay modified with iron nanoparticles. Trend Food Sci Technol2016; 51: 41–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.03.007.
11.
YousfiMLiviSDumasA. Use of new synthetic talc as reinforcing nanofillers for polypropylene and polyamide 6 systems: thermal and mechanical properties. J Colloid Interface Sci2013; 403: 29–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.04.019.
12.
MedeirosEDTocchettoRCarvalhoLD. Nucleating effect and dynamic crystallization of a poly (propylene)/talc system. J Therm Anal Calorim2001; 66(2): 523–531. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1013121102536.
NascimentoEMEirasDPessanLA. Effect of thermal treatment on impact resistance and mechanical properties of polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Compos B Eng2016; 91: 228–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.040.
18.
SudeepanJKumarKBarmanT. Study of tribological behavior of ABS/CaCO3 composite using grey relational analysis. Proc Mater Sci2014; 6: 682–691. DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.084.
19.
PalzaHVergaraVZapataP. Composites of polypropylene melt blended with synthesized silica nanoparticles. Compo Sci Technol2011; 71(4) 535–540. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.002.
20.
HuangHHanBWangL. Crystallization kinetics of polypropylene composites filled with nano calcium carbonate modified with maleic anhydride. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119(3): 1516–1527. DOI: 10.1002/app.32842.
21.
WangYShenHLiG. Crystallization and melting behavior of PP/nano-CaCO3 composites with different interfacial interaction. J Therm Anal Calorim2010; 99(2): 399–407. DOI: 10.1007/s10973–009–0130–4.
22.
OuBLiDLiuY. Compatibilizing effect of maleated polypropylene on the mechanical properties of injection molded polypropylene/polyamide 6/functionalized-TiO2 nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 421–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.010.
23.
YangXTangLGuoY. Improvement of thermal conductivities for PPS dielectric nanocomposites via incorporating NH2-POSS functionalized nBN fillers. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2017; 101: 237–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.005.
24.
YangXGuoYLuoX. Self-healing, recoverable epoxy elastomers and their composites with desirable thermal conductivities by incorporating BN fillers via in-situ polymerization. Compos Sci Technol2018; 164: 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.038.
25.
FuadMHanimHZarinaR. Polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites—effects of processing techniques and maleated polypropylene compatibiliser. eXPRESS Polym Lett2010; 4(10): 611–620. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.76.
KarsliNGAytacA. Effects of maleated polypropylene on the morphology, thermal and mechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Des2011; 32(7): 4069–4073. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.021.
28.
DenacMMusilaVSmitI. Polypropylene/talc/SEBS (SEBS-g-MA) composites. Part 2. Mechanical properties. Compos A Sci Manuf2005; 36(9): 1282–1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.011.
29.
EirasDPessanLA. Mechanical properties of polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Mater Res2009; 12(4): 517–522. DOI: 10.1590/S1516–14392009000400023.
30.
WangGChenXYHuangR. Nano-CaCO3/polypropylene composites made with ultra-high-speed mixer. J Mater Sci Lett2002; 21(13): 985–986. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016044204168.
31.
LapcikLJindrovaPLapcikovaB. Effect of the talc filler content on the mechanical properties of polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 110(5): 2742–2747. DOI: 10.1002/app.28797.
32.
KarradSCuestaJMLCrespyA. Influence of a fine talc on the properties of composites with high density polyethylene and polyethylene/polystyrene blends. J Mater Sci1998; 33(2): 453–461. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1004392318226.
33.
SchöneJKotterIGrellmannW. Properties of polypropylene talc compounds with different talc particle size. J Plast Technol2012; 8: 231–251.
34.
LiYXuGGuoY. Fabrication, proposed model and simulation predictions on thermally conductive hybrid cyanate ester composites with boron nitride fillers. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2018; 107: 570–578. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.006.
35.
LuDPanS. Effects of ball milling dispersion of nano-SiOx particles on impact strength and crystallization behavior of nano-SiOxpoly(phenylene sulfide) nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46(6): 820–825. DOI: 10.1002/pen.20547.
36.
MenbariSGhasemiFAGhasemiI. Simultaneous improvement in the strength and toughness of polypropylene by incorporating hybrid graphene/CaCO3 reinforcement. Polym Test2016; 54: 281–287. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.06.012.
37.
GhasemiFAGhasemiIMenbariS. Optimization of mechanical properties of polypropylene/talc/graphene composites using response surface methodology. Polym Test2016; 53: 283–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.06.012.
38.
ChenHWangMLinY. Morphology and mechanical property of binary and ternary polypropylene nanocomposites with nanoclay and CaCO3 particles. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 106(5): 3409–3416. DOI: 10.1002/app.27017.
39.
CioniBLazzeriA. The role of interfacial interactions in the toughening of precipitated calcium carbonate–polypropylene nanocomposites. Compos Interface2010; 17(5–7): 543–549. DOI: 10.1163/092764410X513486.
40.
WangXTongWLiW. Preparation and properties of nanocomposite of poly(phenylene sulfide)/calcium carbonate. Polym Bull2006; 57(6): 953–962. DOI: 10.1007/s00289–006–0652–x.
41.
LiLDouQ. Effect of malonic acid treatment on crystal structure, melting behavior, morphology, and mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene/nano-CaCO3 composites. J Macromol Sci Phys2011; 50: 831–845. DOI: 10.1002/pc.20881.
42.
DaneshpayehSGhasemiFAGhasemiI. Predicting of mechanical properties of PP/LLDPE/TiO2 nano-composites by response surface methodology. Compos B: Eng2016; 84(1): 109–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.075.
43.
MechtaliFZEEssabirHNekhlaouiS. Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene reinforced with almond shells particles: impact of chemical treatments. J Bionic Eng2015; 12(3): 483–494. DOI: 10.1016/S1672–6529(14)60139–6x.
