Comparison of the paths of two countries with developmental regimes led by left-of-center parties, Chile and Mexico, shows that the democratic regime, Chile’s, had better social indicators than its authoritarian counterpart at the price of slower industrialization.
Comparação das trajetórias de dois países com regimes desenvolvimentistas dirigidos por partidos do centro-esquerda no Chile e México demostra que o regime democrâtico chileno teve maiores indicadores sociais que sua contraparte autoritária às custas de uma industrialização mais lenta.
AckermannMaria G.1970Burguesía industrial e ideología de desarrollo en Chile. Santiago: FLACSO.
2.
AggioAlberto1997“Frente popular, modernização e revolução passiva no Chile.”Revista Brasileira de História17 (34): 221–224.
3.
AggioAlberto2002Democracia e socialismo: A experiência chilena. São Paulo: Annablume.
4.
AlvarezMikeCheibubJosé AntonioLimongiFernandoPrzeworskiAdam1996“Classifying political regimes.”Studies in Comparative International Development31: 3–36.
5.
AmsdenAlice1989Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
AmsdenAlice2001The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-industrializing Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
AnguloBlanca1990“En la construcción y consolidación del estado cardenista, 1936–1940,” pp. 73–110 in GarcíaJavier Aguilar (ed.), Historia de la CTM, 1936–1990: El movimiento obrero y el estado mexicano. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
8.
ArrizabaloXabier1997Crisis y ajuste en la economía mundial: Implicaciones y significado de las políticas del FMI-BM. Madrid: Ed. Síntesis.
9.
AstorgaPablo2007“Real exchange rates in Latin America: what does the 20th century reveal?”IFCS Working Papers in Economic History07/03: 1–60.
10.
AstorgaPablo2017“Functional inequality in Latin America: news from the twentieth century,” pp. 17–41 in BértolaLuísWilliamsonJeffrey (eds.), Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction?Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
11.
BanCornel2013“Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism: new paradigm or edited orthodoxy?”Review of International Political Economy20 (2): 298–331.
12.
BastosPedro2012“A economia política do novo-desenvolvimentismo e do social desenvolvimentismo.”Economia e Sociedade21: 779–810.
13.
BeachDerekPedersenRasmus2013Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
BenavidesLeopoldo1982La democratizacion y el desarrollo en el proyecto popular: Chile 1890–1970. Santiago: FLACSO.
15.
Bresser-PereiraLuiz C.2011“From the national-bourgeoisie to the dependency interpretation of Latin America.”Latin American Perspectives38 (3): 40–58.
16.
Bresser-PereiraLuiz CarlosOreiroJosé LuísMarconiNelson2014Developmental Macroeconomics: New Developmentalism as a Growth Strategy. New York: Routledge.
17.
CaldenteyEsteban2008“The concept and evolution of the developmental state.”International Journal of Political Economy37 (3): 27–53.
18.
CardosoFernando H.1971Política e desenvolvimento em sociedades dependentes: Ideologias do empresariado industrial argentino e brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
19.
ChangHa-Joon1993“The political economy of industrial policy in Korea.”Cambridge Journal of Economics16 (2): 131–157.
20.
ChangHa-Joon1995The Role of the State in Economic Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
ChangHa-Joon1999“The economic theory of the developmental state,” in Woo-CumingsM. (ed.), The Developmental State. New York: Cornell University Press.
22.
Chile1956Exposición del Directorio del Banco Central de Chile relacionada con la situación económica y financiera del país. Memoria Anual del Banco Central de Chile 1955. Santiago: Banco Central de Chile.
23.
CockcroftJames1983Mexico: Class Formation, Capital Accumulation, and the State. New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
CollierSimonSaterWilliam2004A History of Chile, 1808–2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
DahlRobert1971Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26.
Del PozoJosé1989“Los gobiernos radicales en Chile frente al desarrollo (1938–1952).”Caravelle53 (01): 37–64.
27.
DezalayYvesGarthBryant2002The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
DingemansAlfonso2011Una historia económica sin fin: Chile y Argentina en la formación de una economía de mercado, 1973–2001. Santiago: RIL Editores.
29.
EcheniqueAntonia1983Historia de la Compañía de Acero del Pacífico S.A.,1905–1950. Santiago: CAP.
30.
EichengreenBarry2008Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
EvansPeter1995Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
EvansPeter2003“Além da ‘monocultura institucional’: instituições, capacidades e o desenvolvimento deliberativo.”Sociologias5 (9): 20–63.
33.
FaundezJulio2007Democratization, Development and Legality: Chile 1831–1973. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
FélizMariano2019“Neodevelopmentalism and dependency in twenty-first-century Argentina: insights from the work of Ruy Mauro Marini.”Latin American Perspectives46 (1): 105–121.
35.
Ffrench-DavisRicardoMuñozOscarBenaventeJosé MiguelCrespiGustavo2000“The industrialization of Chile during protectionism, 1940–82,” pp. 114–153 in CárdenasEnriqueOcampoJosé Antonio, and ThorpRosemary (eds.), An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
FitzgeraldValpy1985“The financial constraint on relative autonomy: the state and capital accumulation in Mexico, 1940–82,” pp. 210–240 in AngladeChirstianFortinCarlos (eds.), The State and Capital Accumulation in Latin America. London: Macmillan Press.
FonsecaPedro2015“Desenvolvimentismo: a construção do conceito,” pp. 29–78 in CalixtreA.BiancarelliA.CintraM. (eds.), Presente e futuro do desenvolvimento brasileiro. Brasília: IPEA.
39.
FosterLynn2007A Brief History of Mexico. New York: Checkmark Books.
40.
FrankemaEwout2009Has Latin America Always Been Unequal? A Comparative Study of Asset and Income Inequality in the Long Twentieth Century. Leiden: Brill.
41.
FurtadoCelso1964Dialética do desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
42.
FurtadoCelso1984Criatividade e desenvolvimento em época de crise. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
43.
GaussSusan2010Made in Mexico: Regions, Nation, and the State in the Rise of Mexican Industrialism, 1920s–1940s. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.
44.
GeorgeAlexanderBennettAndrew2005Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45.
GerringJohn2007Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
GezmisHilal2018“From neoliberalism to neo-developmentalism? The political economy of post-crisis Argentina (2002–2015).”New Political Economy23 (1): 66–87.
47.
GillinghamPaul2012“Mexican elections, 1910–1994: voters, violence and veto power,” in CampRoderic (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
GrantGeraldine1983“Social classes in Latin America, part 2: class formation and struggle.”Latin American Perspectives10 (2/3): 151–170.
49.
GrezSergio2000“Transición en las formas de lucha: motines peonales y huelgas obreras en Chile (1891–1907).”Historia33: 141–225.
50.
GroveDaniel L.1951“The role of the banking system in the Chilean inflation.”IMF Staff Papers2 (1): 33–59.
51.
GutiérrezCuauhtémoc2005Estructura socioeconómica de México, 1940–2000. Mexico City: Limusa.
52.
HamiltonNora1975“Mexico: the limits of state capitalism.”Latin American Perspectives2 (2): 81–108.
53.
HernándezRogelio2016Historia mínima del Partido Revolucionario Institucional. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
54.
JaguaribeHelio1962Desenvolvimento econômico e desenvolvimento político. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
55.
JohnsonChalmers1982MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
JohnsonChalmers1987“Political institutions and economic performance: the government-business relationship,” pp. 73–89 in DeyoFrederic (ed.), The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
57.
JohnsonChalmers1999 “The developmental state: odyssey of a concept,” pp. 32–60 in Woo-CumingsMeredith (ed), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
58.
KirkwoodBurton2000The History of Mexico. London: Greenwood Press.
59.
KoningsLuis2010“La cuestión social en Chile: concepto, problematización y explicación.”Estudios Historicos CDHRP2 (5): 1–14.
60.
LangstonJoy2006“The birth and transformation of Dedazo in Mexico,” in HelmkeGratchnerLevitskySteven (eds.), Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
LessaCarlos1967“Dos experiências de política econômica: Brasil-Chile.”El Trimestre Econômico135 (34): 445–487.
62.
LevittKari P.2006“Keynes and Polanyi: the 1920s and the 1990s.”Review of International Political Economy13 (1): 152–177.
63.
LoureiroPedro M.Saad-FilhoAlfredo2019“The limits of pragmatism: the rise and fall of the Brazilian Workers’ Party (2002–2016).”Latin American Perspectives46 (1): 66–84.
64.
MarbanMiguel O.1970El partido de la Revolución Mexicana. Mexico City: Salvador Turanzas del Valle.
65.
MellerPatricio1996Un siglo de economía política chilena (1890–1990). Santiago: Andrés Bello.
66.
MillJohn S.2011A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
MonteónMichael1982Chile in the Nitrate Era. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
68.
MorrisJames2000“Las élites, los intelectuales y el consenso,” in GodoyHernán (ed.), Estructura social de Chile. Santiago: Editorial Los Andes.
69.
MoulianTomás1985“Violencia, gradualismo y reformas en el desarrollo político chileno,” in AdulnateA.FlisfischA.MoulianT. (eds.), Estudios sobre el sistema de partidos en Chile. Santiago: FLACSO.
70.
MuñozOscar (ed.) 1993Historias personales, políticas públicas. Santiago: Editorial los Andes.
71.
O’DonnellGuillermo1973Modernisation and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.
72.
ÖnisZiya1991“Review: the logic of the developmental state.”Comparative Politics24 (1): 109–126.
73.
OrtegaLuis1989Corporación de Fomento de la Producción: 50 años de realizaciones 1939–1989. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
74.
PalmaGabriel1984“Chile 1914–1935: de economía exportadora a sustitutiva de importaciones.”Colección de Estudios del CIEPLAN12: 61–88.
75.
PartidoRadical1906Convención del Partido Radical. Santiago: Imprenta y Librería El Comercio.
76.
PempelT. J.1998Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. London: Cornell University Press.
77.
PempelT. J.1999“The developmental regime in a changing world economy,” pp. 137–181 in Woo-CumingsMeredith (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
78.
PolanyiKarl2001The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
79.
PrzeworskiAdamAlvarezMichael E.CheibubJosé AntonioLimongiFernando2000Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
QuezadaAbraham2011Pedro Aguirre Cerda o la trayectoria de un ideal educativo. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
81.
RamirezMiguel D.1986“Mexico’s development experience, 1950–85: lessons and future prospects.”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs28 (2): 39–65.
82.
RandallVicky2007“Political parties and democratic developmental states.”Development Policy Review25: 633–652.
83.
RectorJ.2003The History of Chile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
84.
ReyesJohn1989“El Presidente y su partido durante la época radical: Chile 1938–1952.”Estudios Públicos35:71–101.
85.
RobinsonMarkWhiteGordon1998The Democratic Developmental State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86.
Saad-FilhoAlfredo2020“Varieties of neoliberalism in Brazil (2003–2019).”Latin American Perspectives47 (1): 9–27.
87.
SchedlerAndreas2006“The logic of electoral authoritarianism,” in SchedlerA. (ed.), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. London: Lynne Rienner.
88.
SchumpeterJoseph2008Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy: Third Edition. New York: Harper.
89.
SerranoAlexandre2015“Banking history of Mexico and the 1982 nationalization of banks.”Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking4: 1554–1577.
90.
SinghJewellordOvadiaJesse2018“The theory and practice of building developmental states in the Global South.”Third World Quarterly39: 1033–1055.
91.
SteinbergDavidMalhotraKrishan2014“The effect of authoritarian regime type on exchange rate policy.”World Politics66: 491–529.
92.
StoryDale1986Industry, the State, and Public Policy in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
93.
StrangeGerard2014Towards a New Political Economy of Development States and Regions in the Post-Neoliberal World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
SubercaseauxBernardo2009“Imaginario político de transformación.”Universum24 (2): 218–260.
95.
UngerRoberto M.2008O que a esquerda deve propor. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
96.
VargasJosé2013“Historia e ideologia del continuum PNR-PRM-PRI.”Revista de Derecho Estasiológico, Ideología y Militancia2 (1): 143–157.
97.
VialGonzalo1981Historia de Chile (1891–1973). Santiago: Editorial Santillana.
98.
WadeRobert1990Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
99.
WeberJavier2017“The political economy of income inequality in Chile since 1850,” pp. 43–64 in BértolaLuísWilliamsonJeffrey (eds.), Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction?Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
100.
WhiteGordon1998“Constructing a democratic developmental state,” in RobinsonM.WhiteG. (eds.), The Democratic Developmental State: Political and Institutional Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101.
WolfsonMartin H.1996“A post Keynesian theory of credit rationing.”Journal of Post Keynesian Economics18: 443–470.
102.
Woo-CumingsMeredith (ed.) 1999The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
103.
WyldeChristopher2012Latin America after Neoliberalism: Developmental Regimes in Post-Crisis States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
104.
YatesJulianBakkerKaren2014“Debating the ‘post-neoliberal turn’ in Latin America.”Progress in Human Geography38 (1): 62–90.
105.
ZapataFrancisco2004“De la democracia representativa a la democracia: movimiento obrero y sistema político en Chile.”Revista Enfoques2 (3): 125–155.
