A new developmentalism is said to have taken hold in Brazil over the past decade. Incorporating multiple policy strategies, it has three main pillars: promoting inclusive growth in the home economy, engaging the international economy to underpin national development and to sustain long-term growth, and pursuing internal and external objectives through the collaboration of a strong state and a strong market. In spite of several major accomplishments, this approach has disproportionately used industrial policy tools to privilege firms in traditional sectors and foster increased reliance on commodities, tendencies that have been enabled by bureaucratic incoherence and weak oversight of public financing. This makes it unlikely that deep productive transformation, a key developmentalist objective as defined by the East Asian experience, will materialize.
Dizem que nesta última década, um novo desenvolvimentalismo tomou posse no Brasil. Incorpora muitas estratégias, as quais tem três suportes principais: a promoção dum crescimento globalmente compreensivo no mercado nacional, o aumento das relações com a economia internacional para apoiar o desenvolvimento interno e sustentar o crescimento a longo prazo, e a alcance de objetivos pela colaboração entre um Estado e um mercado fortes. A pesar de várias realizações importantes, este política há empregado, desproporcionalmente, instrumentos de política industrial no sentido de favorecer as empresas dos setores tradicionais e aumentar dependência nas materias primas: uma tendência possibilidada pela incoerência nos procedimentos burocráticos e pela fiscalização fraca dos gastos públicos. Por isso é pouco provável que se realizar qualquer transformação da produção, a que deve ser um objetivo chave desenvolvimentista segundo as padrões da experiências recentes da Ásia oriental.
Abu-El-HajJawdat2007 “From interdependence to neo-mercantilism: Brazilian capitalism in the age of globalization.” Latin American Perspectives34 (5): 92–114.
2.
AmannEdmundBaerWerner2000 “The illusion of stability: the Brazilian economy under Cardoso.” World Development28: 1805–1819.
3.
AmannEdmundBaerWerner2008 “Neo-liberalism and market concentration in Brazil: the emergence of a contradiction?” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance48: 252–262.
4.
AmsdenAlice H.1989Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AmsdenAlice H.1990 “Third World industrialization: ‘global Fordism’ or a new model?” New Left Review182: 5–31.
6.
AmsdenAliceHikinoTakashi2000 “The bark is worse than the bite: new WTO law and late industrialization.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science570: 104–114.
7.
AntunesRicardo2000 “The world of work, the re-structuring of production, and challenges to tradeunionism and social struggles in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives27 (6): 9–26.
8.
ArbixGlauco2010 “Structural change and the emergence of the Brazilian MNEs.” International Journal of Emerging Markets5: 266–288.
9.
ArbixGlaucoCaseiroLuiz2011a “The recent internationalization of Brazilian companies,” pp. 590–618 in NobreFarley SimonWalkerDavidHarrisRobert J. (eds.), Technological, Managerial, and Organizational Core Competencies: Dynamic Innovation and Sustainable Advantage. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
10.
ArbixGlaucoCaseiroLuiz2011b “Inovação à Brasileira: três estilos de internacionalização,” pp. 147–180 in SennesRicardoFilhoAntonio Brito (eds.), Inovações tecnológicas no Brasil: Desempenho, políticas e potencial. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica Editora.
11.
ArbixGlaucoMartinScott B.2010 “Beyond developmentalism and market fundamentalism in Brazil: inclusionary state activism without statism.” Paper presented at the Workshop on States, Development, and Global Governance, Madison, WI, March 12–13.
12.
BaerWerner2001The Brazilian Economy. New York: Praeger.
13.
Banco Central do Brasil2013a “Estatísticas econômicas de capitais brasileiros no exterior.” http://www.bcb.gov.br (accessed June 1, 2013).
14.
Banco Central do Brasil2013b “Série histórica do balanço de pagamentos.” http://www.bcb.gov.br (accessed October 1, 2013).
15.
BarbosaNelsonSouzaJosé Antonio Pereira2010 “A inflexão do governo Lula: política econômica, crescimento e distribuição de renda,” pp. 57–110 in SaderEmirGarciaMarco Aurélio (eds.), Brasil entre opassado e o futuro. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo/Editora Boitempo.
16.
BergJanine2011 “Laws or luck?: understanding rising formality in Brazil in the 2000s,” pp. 123–150 in SangheonLeeMcCannDeirdre (eds.), Regulating for Decent Work: New Directions in Labour Market Regulation. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
BNDES (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social)2013 “BNDES Exim: desempenho das instituições financeiras credenciadas.” http://www.bndes.gov.br (accessed June 1, 2013).
19.
Bresser-PereiraLuiz Carlos2004 “O novo desenvolvimentismo.” Folha de São Paulo, September9.
Bresser-PereiraLuiz Carlos2011 “From old to new developmentalism in Latin America,” pp. 108–129 in José Antonio OcampoRosJaime (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
CarcanholoMarcelo Dias2010 “Inserção externa e vulnerabilidade da economia brasileira no governo Lula,” pp. 109–131 in MagalhãesJoão Paulo de Almeida (ed.), Os anos Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond Universitária.
23.
CavalcanteLuiz RicardoUdermanSimone2012 “Science, technology, and innovation policies in the regional development of Brazil,” pp. 98–121 in BaerWerner (ed.), The Regional Impact of National Policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishing.
24.
CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina)2013 “Cuentas nacionales anuales en dólares.” http://estadisticas.cepal.org (accessed June 1, 2013).
25.
ChangHa-Joon1999 “The economic theory of the developmental state,” pp. 182–199 in Woo-CummingsMeredith (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
26.
ChibberVivek2003Locked in Place. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
ChilcoteRonald1990Power and the Ruling Classes in Northeast Brazil. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
28.
DoreRonald2000Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
DrakePaul W.1996Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
DyerGeoff2008 “Brazil’s lesson for China: do not ignore inequality.” Financial Times, March3.
31.
Economist2013 “A fall from grace.” June8.
32.
EvansPeter1979Dependent Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
EvansPeter1995Embedded Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
FilgueirasLuizPinheiroBrunoPhiligretCelesteBalancoPaulo2010 “Modelo liberal-periférico e bloco de poder: política e dinâmica macroeconómica nos governos Lula,” pp. 35–69 in MagalhãesJoão Paulo de Almeida (ed.), Os anos Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond Universitária.
35.
GereffiGary1990 “Paths of industrialization: an overview,” pp. 3–31 in GereffiGaryWymanDonald L. (eds.), Manufacturing Miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
GonçalvesReinaldo2012 “Novo desenvolvimentismo e liberalismo enraizado,” Serviço Social e Sociedade112: 637–671.
HaggardStephan1990Pathways from the Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
39.
HumphreyJohn2003 “Globalization and supply chain networks: the auto industry in Brazil and India.” Global Networks3 (2): 121–141.
40.
ILO (International Labour Organisation)2011Brazil: An Innovative Income-led Strategy. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
41.
JohnsonChalmers1982MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42.
KohliAtul2004State-directed Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
LazzariniSergio G.MussacchioAldoBandeira-de-MelloRodrigoMarconRosilene2011What Do Development Banks Do? Evidence from Brazil, 2002–2009. Harvard Business School Working Paper 12-047. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
44.
LeahyJoe2012 “Brazil admits to tight hold over exchange rate.” Financial Times, October24.
45.
LoudiyiIhssane2010 “Brazil announces phase 2 of the Growth Acceleration Program.” Growth and Crisis Blog. http://blogs.worldbank.org (accessed July 30, 2010).
46.
MagalhãesJoão Paulo de Almeida2010 “Estratégias e modelos de desenvolvimento,” pp. 19–34 in Paulo de Almeida MagalhãesJoão (ed.), Os anos Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond Universitária.
47.
MartelloAlexandro2011 “Governo prevê salário mínimo acima de $R800 em 2015.” O Globo, September14. http://globo.com (accessed December 14, 2011).
48.
MDIC (Ministerio de Desenvolvimento, Industria, e Comercio)2013 “Estatisticas de comercio exterior.” http://www.desenvolvimento.gov.br (accessed June 1, 2013).
49.
MEC (Ministerio de Educação)2011 “Novas universidades e institutos federais vão abrir 850 mil vagas.” http://portal.mec.gov.br (accessed August 10, 2012).
50.
MineiroAdhemar S.2010 “Desenvolvimento e inserção externa: algumas considerações sobre o período 2003–2009 no Brasil,” pp. 133–159 in Paulo de Almeida MagalhãesJoão (ed.), Os anos Lula. Rio de Janeiro:Garamond Universitária.
51.
MoraisLecioSaad-FilhoAlfredo2012 “Neo-developmentalism and the challenges of economic policy-making under Dilma Rousseff.” Critical Sociology38: 789–798.
52.
MTE (Ministerio de Trabalho e Emprego)2009 “Em seis anos, IBGE apura aumento de trabalhadores com carteira assinada entre os empregados no pais.” September8. http://blog.mte.gov.br (accessed October 14, 2011).
53.
NeriMarcelo2010The New Middle Class: The Bright Side of the Poor. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.
54.
O’HearnDenis2001The Atlantic Economy: Britain, the US, and Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
PiresRoberto2008 “Promoting sustainable compliance: styles of labour inspection and compliance outcomes in Brazil.” International Labour Review147: 199–229.
57.
PochmannMarcio2009 “What Brazil learned from labour flexibilization in the 1990s.” International Labour Review148: 269–282.
58.
RoettRiordan2011The New Brazil. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
59.
SchapiroMario2010 “Development bank, law, and innovation financing in a new Brazilian economy.” Law and Development Review3 (2): 77–121.
60.
SchapiroMario2011 “Rediscovering the developmental path? development bank, law, and innovation financing in the Brazilian economy.” Working Paper 67. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.
61.
SchutteGiorgio Romano2012 “Neo-developmentalism and the search of a new international insertion.” Austral1 (2): 59–93.
62.
ScorzafaveLuiz Guilhermede LimaÉrica Marina Carvalho2010 “Inequality evolution in Brazil: the role of cash transfer programs and other income sources,” pp. 107–129 in BishopJohn A. (ed.), Studies in Applied Welfare Analysis: Papers from the Third ECINEQ Meeting. Research on Economic Inequality 18. Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing.
63.
SeidmanGay1994Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.
64.
SeidmanGay2010 “Brazil’s pro-poor strategies: what South Africa could learn.” Transformation72/73: 86–103.
65.
SicsúJoãode PaulaLuiz FernandoMichelRenaut2005 “Introdução,” pp. xxiii–li in SiscúJoãoFernando de PaulaLuizMichelRenaut (eds.), Novo-desenvolvimentismo: Um projeto nacional de crescimento com equidade social. Rio de Janeiro: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
66.
SicsúJoãode PaulaLuiz FernandoMichelRenaut2007 “Por que um novo-desenvolvimentismo?” Revista de Economia Política27: 507–524.
67.
SmolinskiLuke2013 “Who’s afraid of the big bad capital withdrawal?” Financial Times, September26.
68.
SouzaAngelita Matos2010 “O expansionismo nos governos Lula e o BNDES.” Meridiano47 11 (120): 47–53.
69.
TautzCarlosSistonFelipeLopes PintoJoão RobertoBadinLuciana2010 “O BNDES e a reorganização do capitalismo brasileiro: um debate necessário,” pp. 249–286 in MagalhãesJoão Paulo de Almeida (ed.), Os anos Lula. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond Universitária.
