AylsworthLeon E.1931. “The Passing of Alien Suffrage.”American Political Science Review25:114–16.
2.
BredbennerCandice L.1995. A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Fitsemanu v. United States of America, Case No. 1L18-cv-36 (District Ct., D. Utah 2019).
4.
GardnerMartha. 2005. The Qualities of a Citizen: Women, Immigration, and Citizenship, 1870–1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
GathingsJames A.1949. “Loss of Citizenship and Civil Rights for Conviction of Crime.”The American Political Science Review43(6):1228–34.
6.
HaydukRon.2006. Democracy for All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States. New York: Routledge.
7.
HullElizabeth. 2006. The Disenfranchisement of Ex-Felons. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
ManzaJeffUggenChistopher. 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
PlascenciaLuis F. B.2015. “The Military Gates to U.S. Citizenship: Latina/o ‘Alien and Noncitizen Nationals’ and Military Work.” Latino Studies13(2):162–84.
10.
PlascenciaLuis F. B.2012. Disenchanting Citizenship: Mexican Migrants and the Boundaries of Belonging. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
PlascenciaLuis F. B.Holguín CuádrazGloria eds. 2018. Mexican Workers and the Making of Arizona. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
12.
RaskinJamin B.1993. “Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meaning of Alien Suffrage.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review141:1391–470.
13.
ShklarJudith. 1991. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
SmithDonnal V.1932. “The Influence of the Foreign-Born of the Northwest in the Election of 1860.”Mississippi Valley Historical Review19(2):192–204.
15.
Tuaua v. United States, 788 F.3d (D.C. Cir 2015).
16.
UggenChristopherManzaJeff. 2002. “Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States.”American Sociological Review67(6):777–803.