Although many studies have investigated the disproportionate representation and negative experiences of justice-involved persons with mental illness (MI), we know less about probation/parole revocations among this population. Using statewide data and propensity score matching, we compare rates of rearrests and revocations between individuals with and without MI and assess the effectiveness of Specialized Mental Health Supervision (SMHS) in reducing the likelihood of revocation. In addition, we examine whether the risk score composition differs among participants of the SMHS program from clients with MI not placed on SMHS. Findings reveal that persons with MI are more likely to have a revocation, specifically for technical violations. In addition, SMHS does not significantly lower revocations after controlling for other caseload characteristics. Finally, those with higher risk scores were significantly less likely to be placed on SMHS caseloads. Considerations for SMHS implementation are discussed.
Al-RousanT.RubensteinL.SieleniB.DeolH.WallaceR. B. (2017). Inside the nation’s largest mental health institution: A prevalence study in a state prison system. BMC Public Health, 17(342), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4257-0
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(10), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
BaillargeonJ.WilliamsB. A.MellowJ.HarzkeA. J.HogeS. K.BaillargeonG.GreifingerR. B. (2009). Parole revocation among prison inmates with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 60(11), 1516–1521. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.60.11.1516
6.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
7.
BontaJ.BlaisJ.WilsonH. A. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014
8.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonK. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.123
9.
CefaluM.RidgewayG.McCaffreyD.MorralA.GriffinB. A.BurgetteL. (2021). Twang: Toolkit for weighting and analysis of nonequivalent groups (R package version 2.5). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=twang
10.
CloyesK. G.WongB.LatimerS.AbarcaJ. (2010). Time to prison return for offenders with serious mental illness released from prison a survival analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809354370
CrillyJ. F.CaineE. D.LambertiJ. S.BrownT.FriedmanB. (2009). Mental health services use and symptom prevalence in a cohort of adults on probation. Psychiatric Services, 60(4), 542–544. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.542
13.
DittonP. (1999). Mental health and the treatment of inmates and probationers. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhtip.pdf
Eno LoudenJ.ManchakS. M.RicksE. P.KennealyP. J. (2018). The role of stigma toward mental illness in probation officers’ perceptions of risk and case management decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(5), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818756148
16.
HarrisH.HorstJ. S. (2019). A brief guide to decisions at each step of the propsensity score matching process. Practical Assessment, Research, adn Evaluation, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.7275/yq7r-4820
17.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
18.
LurigioA. J.EppersonM. W.CanadaK. E.BabchukL. C. (2012). Specialized probation programs for people with mental illness: A review of practices and research. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.682845
19.
ManchakS. M.SkeemJ. L.KennealyP. J.Eno LoudenJ. (2014). High-fidelity specialty mental health probation improves officer practices, treatment access, and rule compliance. Law and Human Behavior, 38(5), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000076
20.
MillerJ.MaloneyC. (2013). Practitioner compliance with risk/needs assessment tools: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812468883
21.
MorganR. D.FisherW. H.DuanN.MandracchiaJ. T.MurrayD. (2010). Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9182-z
22.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
23.
OstermannM.MatejkowskiJ. (2014). Exploring the intersection of mental health and release status with recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 746–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.677465
24.
PrinsS. J. (2014). Prevalence of mental illnesses in US State prisons: A systematic review. Psychiatric Services, 65(7), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300166
25.
SkeemJ. L.Emke-FrancisP.Eno LoudenJ. (2006). Probation, mental health, and mandated treatment: A national survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480528440
26.
SkeemJ. L.ManchakS.MontoyaL. (2017). Comparing public safety outcomes for traditional probation vs specialty mental health probation. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(9), 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1384
27.
SkeemJ. L.SteadmanH. J.ManchakS. M. (2015). Applicability of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Service, 66(9), 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400448
Van DeinseT. B.CuddebackG. S.WilsonA. B.LambertM.EdwardsD. (2018). Using statewide administrative data and brief mental health screening to estimate the prevalence of mental illness among probationers. Probation Journal, 66(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550518808369
30.
Van DeinseT. B.GivensA.CowellM.GhezziM.Murray-LichtmanA.CuddebackG. S. (2021). A randomized trial of specialty mental health probation: Measuring implementation and effectiveness outcomes. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 49, 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01172-0
31.
WilsonA. B.FarkasK.IshlerK. J.GearhartM.MorganR.AsheM. (2014). Criminal thinking styles among people with serious mental illness in jail. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 592–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000084
32.
WolffN.EppersonM.ShiJ.HueningJ.SchumannB. E.SullivanI. R. (2014). Mental health specialized probation caseloads: Are they effective?International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(5), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.019
33.
WolffN.MorganR. D.ShiJ.FisherW.HueningJ. (2011). Comparative analysis of thinking styles and emotional states of male and female inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 62(12), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.000432011
34.
WolffN.PogorzelskiW. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of mental health courts: Challenges and recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(4), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.4.539
35.
ZeileisA.KöllS.GrahamN. (2020). Various versatile variances: An object-oriented implementation of clustered covariances in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 95(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v095.i01
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
