Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study is the first to assess public support for drug courts as a “third chance,” referring to an additional opportunity, beyond the initial and second chances, to receive rehabilitative support. We first used a survey experiment to investigate how offense characteristics and criminal records affected people’s initial support for drug courts. We then examined whether support persisted after the initial treatment had failed. Results showed strong initial public support for drug courts, with offense nature and criminal history significantly affecting this support. People also expressed subsequent support for drug courts after the initial attempt had failed. Finally, we found the effects of failure-related information were asymmetrical. Our results indicate that people were open-minded and supportive about granting people involved in drug offenses a second chance, and even a third, chance. Yet making people less punitive proved more challenging than driving them toward more punitive stances.

Keywords

drug courts policy failure public opinion second chance survey experiment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applegate

B. K.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

Sundt

J. L.

(1996). Assessing public support for Three-Strikes-and-You’re-Out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128796042004002

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

Sloas

L. B.

(2019). Support for balanced justice and rehabilitation for justice-involved veterans. Criminal Justice Review, 44(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016818793698

Avdagic

Savage

(2021). Negativity bias: The impact of framing of immigration on welfare state support in Germany, Sweden and the UK. British Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 624–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000395

Belenko

Fabrikant

Wolff

(2011). The long road to treatment: Models of screening and admission into drug courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1222–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811424690

Berryessa

C. M.

(2022). A tale of “second chances”: An experimental examination of popular support for early release mechanisms that reconsider long-term prison sentences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(4), 783–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09466-x

Bobo

L. D.

Johnson

(2004). A taste for punishment: Black and White Americans’ views on the death penalty and the war on drugs. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1(1), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X04040081

Bronson

Stroop

Zimmer

Berzofsky

(2020). Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007-2009. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/dudaspji0709.pdf

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2021). Total correctional population. https://bjs.ojp.gov/data/key-statistics

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2023). Correctional populations in the United States, 2021-statistal tables. https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/cpus21st.pdf

10.

Cable News Network/USA Today . (1994). Gallup/CNN/USA Today poll: Health care reform/crime, question 50 [USGALLUP.94AGW2.R26D]. Cornell University, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.

11.

Callanan

V. J.

(2004). Feeding the fear of crime: Crime-related media and support for three strikes. Lfb Scholarly Pub LLC.

12.

Chong

Druckman

J. N.

(2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

13.

Coppock

McClellan

O. A.

(2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 205316801882217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174

14.

Cullen

F. T.

Butler

L. C.

Graham

(2021). Racial attitudes and criminal justice policy. Crime and Justice, 50(1), 163–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/715911

15.

Enns

P. K.

(2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12098

16.

Fischle

(2000). Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: Motivated reasoning or Bayesian updating? Political Psychology, 21(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00181

17.

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 775.082. (2019).

18.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Najaka

S. S.

Kearley

(2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00117.x

19.

Graham

M. H.

(2020). Self-awareness of political knowledge. Political Behavior, 42(1), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9499-8

20.

Guess

Coppock

(2020). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327

21.

Hannan

K. R.

Cullen

F. T.

Graham

Jonson

C. L.

Pickett

J. T.

Haner

Sloan

M. M.

(2023). Public support for second look sentencing: Is there a Shawshank redemption effect? Criminology & Public Policy, 22(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12616

22.

Kieckhaefer

J. M.

Luna

(2020). Do you think some veterans are receiving a “get out of jail free” card? Examining support for Veterans Treatment Court as a function of mental health and offense type. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(1), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09395-w

23.

LaBelle

(2024). Looking ahead: Drug policy in the next Trump administration. O’Neill Institution. https://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/drug-policy-in-the-trump-administration/

24.

Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2000). Proposition 36. https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2000/36_11_2000.html

25.

Lodge

Taber

(2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In Lupia

McCubbins

M. D.

Popkin

S. L.

(Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 182–213). Cambridge University Press.

26.

Mancini

McDougle

Keegan

(2021). A first step, a second chance: Public support for restoring rights of individuals with prior convictions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(16), 1736–1755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20969948

27.

Matthews

(2005). The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology, 9(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605051639

28.

McLeod

A. M.

(2012). Decarceration courts: Possibilities and perils of a shifting criminal law. The Georgetown Law Journal, 100, 1587–1674.

29.

Miller

E. J.

(2007). The therapeutic effects of managerial reentry courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20(2), 127–135.

30.

National Center for State Courts. (2006a). National Center for State Courts poll # 2006-NCSC: Sentencing attitudes, question 60 [USPSRA.06SENTENC.R30A]. Cornell University, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.

31.

National Center for State Courts. (2006b). National Center for State Courts poll # 2006-NCSC: Sentencing attitudes, question 61 [USPSRA.06SENTENC.R30B]. Cornell University, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.

32.

Peffley

Hurwitz

Mondak

(2017). Racial attributions in the justice system and support for punitive crime policies. American Politics Research, 45(6), 1032–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17692326

33.

Perelman

A. M.

Clements

C. B.

(2009). Beliefs about what works in juvenile rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808328122

34.

Peyton

Huber

G. A.

Coppock

(2023). “The generalizability of online experiments conducted during the COVID—19 pandemic”—CORRIGENDUM. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10, 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.23

35.

Pickett

J. T.

(2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024826

36.

Pickett

J. T.

Baker

(2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical reality or methodological artifact? Criminology, 52(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12035

37.

Ramirez

M. D.

(2013). Punitive sentiment. Criminology, 51(2), 329–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12007

38.

Rozin

Royzman

E. B.

(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2

39.

Sibley

S. K.

(2022). The unchosen: Procedural fairness in criminal speciaty court selection. Cardozo Law Review, 43(6), 2261–2316.

40.

Silver

J. R.

Silver

(2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232

41.

Sloas

L. B.

Atkin-Plunk

C. A.

(2019). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418762532

42.

Sloas

L. B.

Larrea

(2023). Rethinking sanctioning for offenders with mental health issues: A balanced justice approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09620-1

43.

Strong

S. M.

Kyckelhahn

(2016). Census of problem-solving courts, 2012. https://bjs.ojp.gov/data-collection/census-problem-solving-courts-cpsc

44.

Thielo

A. J.

Cullen

F. T.

Burton

A. L.

Moon

M. M.

Burton

V. S

Jr . (2019). Prisons or problem-solving: Does the public support specialty courts? Victims & Offenders, 14(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1595243

45.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2023). Adult drug court programs. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105272.pdf

46.

The White House. (2025a). Restoring the death penalty and protecting public safety. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-the-death-penalty-and-protecting-public-safety/

47.

The White House. (2025b). Securing our borders. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/securing-our-borders/

48.

Wilson

D. B.

Mitchell

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2007). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(4), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4

49.

(2022). The effect of wrongful conviction rate on death penalty support: A research note. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18, 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09467-w

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Public Support for Drug Courts: Beyond a Second Chance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material