Little is known regarding the criminogenic needs of men and women who self-report intimate partner violence (IPV). We examined criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs of men and women within the general population who self-reported in three groups: perpetrating physical IPV, perpetrating non-IPV physical violence, and nonviolence perpetration. The sample included 847 men and 1437 women from the Interpersonal Conflict and Resolution (iCOR) Study. Those who self-reported IPV exhibited criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs, ranging from antisocial personality patterns (10%) to criminal associates (69%). Participants who self-reported engaging in IPV had the most criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs, had similar needs to those reporting non-IPV violence, and had consistently more needs than the nonviolence group. Overall, women reported more noncriminogenic needs than men. Community-based IPV treatment programs accepting individuals from multiple referral sources should anticipate variation in criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs among participants, especially relative to gender and referral type.
AhmadabadiZ.NajmanJ. M.WilliamsG. M.ClavarinoA. M.d’AbbsP. (2021). Gender differences in intimate partner violence in current and prior relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517730563
AnglimJ.HorwoodS.SmillieL. D.MarreroR. J.WoodJ. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226
4.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651
5.
ArmstrongT. A.BoisvertD.WellsJ.LewisR. H.CookeE.WoecknerM. (2020). Assessing potential overlap between self-control and psychopathy: A consideration of the Grasmick self-control scale and the Levenson self-report psychopathy scale. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70, 101725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101725
6.
BelknapJ. (2021). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Sage.
BergM. T.RogersE. M.LiuW.MumfordE. A.TaylorB. G. (2019). The interpersonal context of depression and violent behavior: A social psychological interpretation. Aggressive behavior, 45(4), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21832
9.
BerwickD. M.MurphyJ. M.GoldmanP. A.WareJ. E.JrBarskyA. J.WeinsteinM. C. (1991). Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care, 29(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008
10.
BijlsmaA. M. E.van der PutC. E.van HornJ.AssinkM. (2021). Gender differences between domestic violence men and women: Criminogenic risk factors and their association with treatment dropout. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP21875–NP21901. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211063015
BouffardL. A.ZedakerS. B. (2016). Are domestic violence offenders specialists? Answers from multiple analytic approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(6), 788–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816656897
13.
BushK.KivlahanD. R.McDonellM. B.FihnS. D.BradleyK. A. (1989). The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789
14.
CannonC.HamelJ.ButtellF.FerreiraR. J. (2016). A survey of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United States and Canada: Findings and implications for policy and intervention. Partner Abuse, 7(3), 226–276. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.3.226
DeLisiM.PechorroP.MarocoJ.SimõesM. (2021). Overlapping measures or constructs? An empirical study of the overlap between self-control, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and narcissism. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3(2021), 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100141
17.
DeLisiM.PiqueroA. R. (2011). New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2001-2011: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.001
18.
EvansC. P.MemanA. N.MurphyC. M. (2024). Do different legal system and self-referral pathways influence relationship violence intervention program success?Journal of Family Violence, 39, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00474-7
19.
FalkenbachD.PoythressN.FalkiM.ManchakS. (2007). Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of psychopathy. Assessment, 14(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107305612
20.
FritzC. O.MorrisP. E.RichlerJ. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
21.
Garcia-MansillaA.RosenfeldB.NichollsT. L. (2009). Risk assessment: Are current methods applicable to women?International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(1), 50–61. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/14999010903014747
22.
GobeilR.BlanchetteK.StewartL. (2016). A meta-analytic review of correctional interventions for women offenders: Gender-neutral versus gender-informed approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815621100
23.
GowerM.SpiranovicC.MorganF.SaundersJ. (2022). The criminogenic profile of violent female offenders incarcerated in Western Australian prisons as per the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR) and Violence Risk Scale (VRS). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 30(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.2006095
24.
HareR. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
25.
Higgins-BiddleJ. C.BaborT. F. (2018). A review of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C, and USAUDIT for screening in the United States: Past issues and future directions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 44(6), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2018.1456545
26.
HiltonN. Z.EkeA. W. (2016). Non-specialization of criminal careers among intimate partner violence offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(10), 1347–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816637886
27.
HiltonN. Z.RadatzD. L. (2018). The criminogenic and noncriminogenic treatment needs of intimate partner violence offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3247–3259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17740015
28.
HiltonN. Z.RadatzD. L. (2021). Criminogenic needs and intimate partner violence: Association with recidivism and implications for treatment. Psychological Services, 18(4), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000450
29.
HiltonN. Z.RadatzD. L. (2024). Coercive control in a national U.S. self-report survey: Prediction of repeated intimate partner violence. Psychological Services. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000881
30.
JohnsonW. L.TaylorB. G.MumfordE. A.LuiW. (2020). Dyadic correlates of the perpetration of psychological aggression among intimate partners. Psychology of Violence, 10(4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000257
31.
MazerolleP.McPhedranS. (2018). Specialization and versatility in offending. In FarringtonD. P.KazemianL.PiqueroA. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental and life-course criminology (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.
32.
McKeownA.KennedyP. J.McGrathJ. (2022). Female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. In BrownS. L.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory, practice, and policy (pp. 354–367). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119874898.ch25
33.
MilnerA.KrnjackiL.LaMontagneA. D. (2016). Age and gender differences in the influence of social support on mental health: a longitudinal fixed-effects analysis using 13 annual waves of the HILDA cohort. Public health, 140, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.029
34.
MotiukM. S.MotiukL. L.BontaJ. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854892019002003
35.
MumfordE. A.TaylorB. G.BergM.LiuW.MiesfeldN. (2019). The social anatomy of adverse childhood experiences and aggression in a representative sample of young adults in the US. Child abuse & neglect, 88, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.10.016
36.
MumfordE. A.TaylorB. G.LiuW.BergM. (2019, April29). The Interpersonal Conflict and Resolution (iCOR) Study, United States, 2016-2018. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37164.v1
OlverM.StockdaleK. C. (2022). Can “gender neutral” risk assessment tools be used with women and girls? If so, how?In BrownS. L.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory, practice, and policy (pp. 102–119). Wiley.
39.
PechorroP.DeLisiM.GonçalvesR. A.QuintasJ.Hugo PalmaV. (2021). The Brief Self-Control Scale and its refined version among incarcerated and community youths: Psychometrics and measurement invariance. Deviant Behavior, 42(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1684942
40.
PetersJ. R.NunesK. L.EnnisL.HiltonN. Z.PhamA.JungS. (2022). Latent class analysis of the heterogeneity of intimate partner violent men: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(3), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000192
RadatzD. L.HansenJ.ThomassonC. (2020). Domestic violence treatment in Colorado: An overview of an evidence-based approach. Partner Abuse, 11(3), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-D-20-00007
43.
RadatzD. L.RichardsT. N.MurphyC. M.NitschL. J.Green-ManningA.BrokmeierA. M.HollidayC. N. (2021). Integrating “principles of effective intervention” into domestic violence intervention programs: New opportunities for change and collaboration. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09627-8
44.
RadatzD. L.WrightE. M. (2016). Integrating the principles of effective intervention into batterer intervention programming: The case for moving toward more evidence-based programming. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566695
45.
RadatzD. L.WrightE. M. (2017). Does polyvictimization affect incarcerated and non-incarcerated adult women differently? An exploration into internalizing problems. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(9), 1379–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515588921
46.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
47.
RentzschK.ErzE.SchützA. (2022). Development of short and ultra-short forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(4), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000660
48.
RichardsT. N.GoverA. R.BranscumC.NystromA.ClaxtonT. (2022). Assessing states’ intimate partner violence offender treatment standards using a principles of effective intervention framework. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP20288–NP20310. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211050091
49.
SalisburyE. J.BoppreB.KellyB. (2016). Gender-responsive risk and need assessment: Implications for the treatment of justice-involved women.In TaxmanF. (Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment (pp. 236–259). Routledge.
50.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
51.
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00551.x
52.
SparksB.WielingaF.JungS.OlverM. E. (2020). Recidivism Risk and Criminogenic Needs of Individuals Who Perpetrated Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Offenses. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 15, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.3713
53.
SpencerC. M.StithS. M.CafferkyB. (2020). What puts individuals at risk for physical intimate partner violence perpetration? A meta-analysis examining risk markers for men and women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020925776
54.
StairmandM.DixonL.PolaschekD. L. L. (2021). Testing the generalizability of the event process model of family violence with an incarcerated sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20944655
55.
StewartE. A.SchreckC. J.SimonsR. L. (2006). “I ain’t gonna let no one disrespect me” Does the code of the street reduce or increase violent victimization among African American adolescents?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 427–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806292338
56.
StewartL. A.GaboraN.AllegriN.Slavin-StewM. C. (2014). Profile of female perpetrators of intimate partner violence in an offender population: Implications for treatment. Partner Abuse, 5(2), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.2.168
57.
StewartL. A.PowerJ. (2014). Profile and programming needs of federal offenders with histories of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2723–2747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526059
58.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
59.
TaylorB. G.MumfordE. A.LiuW.BergM.BohriM. (2019). Young adult reports of the victim–offender overlap in intimate and nonintimate relationships: A nationally representative sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(3), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818810322
60.
TraversA.McDonaghT.CunninghamT.ArmourC.HansenM. (2021). The effectiveness of interventions to prevent recidivism in perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 84, 101974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101974
61.
UngJ.LloydC. D. (2024). Exploring the relationships between criminal self-efficacy factors and recidivism. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 29(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12265
62.
van der KnaapL. M.AlberdaD. L.OosterveldP.BornM. (2012). The predictive validity of criminogenic needs for male and female offenders: Comparing the relative impact of needs in predicting recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093932
63.
Van VoorhisP.WrightE. M.SalisburyE.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442
64.
VerbruggenJ.BloklandA. A.RobinsonA. L.MaxwellC. D. (2022). General offending and intimate partner violence perpetration in young adulthood: A Dutch longitudinal study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(16), 1796–1820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211022657
65.
VerbruggenJ.MaxwellC. D.RobinsonA. L. (2022). The relationship between the development of general offending and intimate partner violence perpetration in young adulthood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), 1179–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922340
66.
WolbersH.AckermanJ. (2020). The degree of specialization among female partner violence offenders and the role of self-defense in its explanation. Victims & Offenders, 15(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1671280
67.
WormithJ. S.BontaJ. (2021). Risk/need assessment for adults and older adolescents: The Level of Service (LS) Instruments. In DoouglasK. S.OttoR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 159–190). Routledge.
68.
WrightE. M.Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE. J.BaumanA. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451088
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
