Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using a vignette-based experimental design, this study tested whether the racial or ethnic identity of a justice-impacted person influences jury-eligible individuals’ perceptions of post-conviction risk, placement (incarceration vs. community supervision), and need for mandated treatment. Furthermore, we examined whether the inclusion of data from a reoffense risk tool could mitigate racial bias. Participants recruited through Amazon’s MTurk (N = 448) were randomly assigned to conditions varying by race/ethnicity of an examinee (Black, Latino, White) and if/how risk assessment data were included (no risk data, risk data only, and risk data reported by a qualified examiner). There was no statistically significant effect of the examinee’s racial/ethnic identity on ratings of reoffense risk or placement decisions; however, the Black examinee was more likely to be mandated with treatment. Regardless of examinee identity, participants exposed to risk information proffered by an expert more often calibrated their risk decisions to the examinee’s actual risk level.

Keywords

racial bias re-offense risk assessment court diversion forensic mental health assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association. (2007). ABA Standards for criminal justice: Pretrial release (3rd ed.). https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/criminal_justice_standards/pretrial_release.authcheckdam.pdf

American Bar Association. (2022). 2022 Profile of the Legal Profession. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/news/2022/07/profile-report-2022.pdf

American Civil Liberties Union. (2018). Racial disparities in criminal justice. https://www.aclu.org/issues/mass-incarceration/racial-disparities-criminal-justice

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(1995). The level of service inventory—revised: User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12254

Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, Public Law 99-570. (1986).

Bailey

C. A.

Galcia

B. E.

Salinas

K. Z.

Briones

Hugo

Hunter

Venta

A. C.

(2020). Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in anger management therapy as a probation condition. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 88–96. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/lhb0000355

Barnes

A. J.

Hanoch

Miron-Shatz

Ozanne

E. M.

(2016). Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt? Health Psychology, 35(9), 1007–1016. https://10.1037/hea0000367

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057

10.

Bhati

A. S.

Roman

J. K.

Chalfin

(2008). To treat or not to treat: Evidence on the prospects of expanding treatment to drug-involved offenders. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/222908.pdf

11.

Brown

E. K.

Socia

K. M.

Silver

J. R.

(2019). Conflicted conservatives, punitive views, and anti-Black racial bias 1974 – 2014. Punishment & Society, 21(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517736295

12.

Brown

Singh

J. P.

(2014). Forensic risk assessment: A beginner’s guide. Archives of Forensic Psychology, 1(1), 49–59. https://www.academia.edu/25597163/Forensic_Risk_Assessment_A_Beginners_Guide

13.

Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2024, October). Community Supervision. Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice. https://bja.ojp.gov/program/psrac/implementation/structured-decision-making/community-supervision

14.

Carson

E. A.

(2023). Prisons report series: Preliminary data release, 2022. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/preliminary-data-release-prisons

15.

Casler

Bickel

Hackett

(2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to- face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009

16.

Chmielewski

Kucker

S. C.

(2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149

17.

Coviello

D. M.

Zanis

D. A.

Wesnoski

S. A.

Palman

Gur

Lynch

K. G.

McKay

J. R.

(2013). Does mandating offenders to treatment improve completion rates? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.10.003

18.

Davis

R. M.

Batastini

A. B.

Sacco

Dahlen

E. R.

Jones

A. C. T.

(2022). Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12204

19.

Desmarais

S. L.

Zottola

S. A.

(2020). Violence risk assessment: Current status and contemporary issues. Marquette Law Review, 103(3), 793–817. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol103/iss3/6

20.

Eckhouse

Lum

Conti-Cook

Ciccolini

(2018). Layers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818811379

21.

Ellis

Diamond

S. S.

(2003). Race, diversity, and jury composition: Battering and bolstering legitimacy. Chi.-Kent L. Rev., 78, 1033. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol78/iss3/6/

22.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

23.

Field

(2015). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

24.

Fox

Miley

L. N.

Kortright

K. E.

Wetsman

R. J.

(2021). Assessing the effect of mental health courts on adult and juvenile recidivism: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(4), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09629-6

25.

Green

E. G. T.

Staerklé

Sears

D. O.

(2006). Symbolic racism and Whites’ attitudes towards punitive and preventive crime policies. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9020-5

26.

Heilbrun

Marzyck

G. K.

DeMatteo

Zillmer

E. A.

Harris

Jennings

(2003). Principles of forensic mental health assessment: Implications for neuropsychological assessment in forensic contexts. Assessment, 10(4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103258591

27.

Kennedy

Clifford

Burleigh

Waggoner

P. D.

Jewell

Winter

N. J. G.

(2020). The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(4), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.6

28.

Klein

Ogbunugafor

C. B.

Schafer

B. J.

Bhadricha

Kori

Sheldon

Kaza

Sharma

Wang

E. A.

Eliassi-Rad

Scarpino

S. V.

Hinton

(2023). COVID-19 amplified racial disparities in the US criminal legal system. Nature, 617(7960), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-023-05980-2

29.

Kochel

T. R.

Wilson

D. B.

Mastrofski

S. D.

(2011). Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49(2), 473–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00230.x

30.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

C. C.

(2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52(3), 514–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12047

31.

Lehman

J. K.

Smith

J. B.

(2013). A multidimensional examination of jury composition, trial outcomes, and attorney preferences. Law Economics. http://www.uh.edu/~jlehman2/papers/lehmann_smith_jurycomposition.pdf

32.

D. S.

Correll

Wittenbrink

(2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5

33.

Marrow

W. J.

White

M. D.

Fradella

H. F.

(2017). After the stop: Exploring racial/ethnic disparities in police use of force during Terry stops. Police Quarterly, 20(4), 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611117708791

34.

Marutto

Hannah-Moffat

(2007). Understanding risk in the context of the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49(4), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.49.4.465

35.

Mazella

Feingold

(1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgements of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x

36.

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2018, July 10). The trial penalty: The sixth amendment right to trial on the verge of extinction and how to save it. https://www.nacdl.org/Document/TrialPenaltySixthAmendmentRighttoTrialNearExtinct

37.

Nellis

(2021, October 13). The color of justice: Racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/color-of-justice-racial-and-ethnic-disparity-in-state-prisons/

38.

Neville

H. A.

Lilly

R. L.

Duran

Lee

R. M.

Browne

(2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.59

39.

Parrott

C. T.

Neal

T. M. S.

Wilson

J. K.

Brodsky

S. L.

(2015). Differences in expert witness knowledge: Do mock jurors notice and does it matter? The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43(1), 69–81. https://jaapl.org/content/43/1/69

40.

PEW Charitable Trusts. (2020, April). Policy reforms can strengthen community supervision: A framework to improve probation and parole. https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2020/04/policyreform_communitysupervision_report_final.pdf

41.

Picard

Watkins

Rempel

Kerodal

A. G.

(2019, July). Beyond the algorithm: Pretrial reform, risk assessment, and racial fairness. Center for Court Innovation. https://www.courtinnovation.org/publications/beyond-algorithm

42.

Romain

D. M.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2013). Prosecutorial discretion for domestic violence cases: An examination of the effects of offender race, ethnicity, gender, and age. Criminal Justice Studies, 26(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2012.745399

43.

Ruva

C. L.

Smith

D. K.

Sykes

E. C.

(2023). Gender, generations, and guilt: Defendant gender and age affect jurors’ decisions and perceptions in an intimate partner homicide trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(23–24). https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231191227

44.

Salkind

N. J.

(2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vols. 1-0). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288

45.

Schlesinger

(2013). Racial disparities in pretrial diversion: An analysis of outcomes among men charged with felonies and processed in state courts. Race and Justice, 3(3), 210–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368713483320

46.

Shepherd

S. M.

Anthony

(2017). Popping the cultural bubble of violence risk assessment tools. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1354055

47.

Skeem

J. L.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

(2016). Risk, race, and recidivism: Predictive bias and disparate impact. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 54(4), 680–712. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.12123

48.

Snyder

C. M.

Anderson

S. A.

(2009). An examination of mandated versus voluntary referral as a determinant of clinical outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(3), 278–292. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00118.x

49.

Starr

S. B.

(2014). Evidence-based sentencing and the scientific rationalization of discrimination. Stanford Law Review, 66(4), 803–872. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/evidence-based-sentencing-and-the-scientific-rationalization-of-discrimination/

50.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). The Sequential Intercept Model. U.S. Department of Human & Health Services. https://www.samhsa.gov/criminal-juvenile-justice/sim-overview

51.

Sutton

J. R.

(2013). Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants. Social Science Research, 42(5), 1207–1221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.003

52.

Sweeney

L. T.

Haney

(1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta- analytic review of experimental studies. Behavior Sciences and the Law, 10(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100204

53.

Tabachnick

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

54.

Tolman

Rotzien

(2007). Conducting risk evaluations for future violence: Ethical practice is possible. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.71

55.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021, August 12). Race and ethnicity in the United States 2010 census and 2020 census. U. S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/race-and-ethnicity-in-the-united-state-2010-and-2020-census.html

56.

Van Es

R. M. S.

Kunst

M. J. J.

De Keijser

J. W.

(2020). Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 51, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101387

57.

Viglione

Hannon

DeFina

(2011). The impact of light skin on prison time for Black female offenders. The Social Science Journal, 48(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.08.003

58.

Viljoen

J. L.

Johnson

M. R.

Cochrane

D. M.

Vargen

L. M.

Vincent

G. M.

(2019). Impact of risk assessment instruments on rates of pretrial detention, postconviction placements, and release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 43(5), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000344

59.

Vincent

G. M.

Viljoen

J. L.

(2020). Racist algorithms or systemic problems? Risk assessments and racial disparities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1576–1584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854820954501

60.

(2016). Racial and ethnic discrimination and prosecution. A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815628026

61.

Yang

Zhu

Zhang

Wang

Liu

Sun

(2019). Effects of male defendants’ attractiveness and trustworthiness on simulated judicial decisions in two different swindles. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.23 MB

Can an Expert Opinion Mitigate Racially Biased Diversion Decisions? An Empirical Examination in the Context of Re-Offense Risk Assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material