Pretrial Risk Assessment,Release Recommendations,and Racial Bias

Abstract

We examined how the presentation of risk assessment results and the race of the person charged affected pretrial court actors’ recommendations to release a person with or without conditions. A sample of 246 pretrial court actors read vignettes that varied risk framing (success, failure), risk format (probability, frequency), risk level (low, high), and race of the person charged (Black, White). Pretrial release recommendations did not differ as a function of framing or format overall or by race. Pretrial court actors were more likely to recommend release with conditions compared with release without conditions in the high- versus low-risk groups when the person was White but not when the person was Black. Findings fail to support changes to the presentation of pretrial risk assessment results as strategies to enhance their impact on release recommendations and underscore the need for efforts to ensure equitable application of risk assessment results for people of color.

Keywords

pretrial decision-making risk presentation risk assessment pretrial reform racial bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research. (n.d.). About the Public Safety Assessment: PSA requirements. https://advancingpretrial.org/psa/psarequirements/

Anderson

Redcross

Valentine

Miratrix

(2019). Evaluation of pretrial justice system reforms that use the Public Safety Assessment: Effects of New Jersey’s criminal justice reform. MDRC. https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/PSA_New_Jersey_Report_%231.pdf

Andrews

D. A.

Dowden

(2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05282556

Arnold

Dobbie

Yang

C. S.

(2018). Racial bias in bail decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1885–1932. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy012

Bail Reform Act of 1984, H.R. 5865, 98th Cong. (1984). https://www.congress.gov/bill/98th-congress/house-bill/5865

Baughman

S. B.

(2017). The bail book: A comprehensive look at bail in America’s criminal justice system. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443194

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.

Brennan Center. (2020). Courts’ responses to the Covid-19 crisis. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/courts-responses-covid-19-crisis

Brittain

B. J.

Georges

Martin

(2021). Examining the predictive validity of the Public Safety Assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(10), 1431–1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211005836

10.

Britwum

Yiannaka

(2019). Consumer willingness to pay for food safety interventions: The role of message framing and issue involvement. Food Policy, 86(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.009

11.

Cerda-Jara

Czifra

Galindo

Mason

Ricks

Zohrabi

(2019). Language guide for communicating about those involved in the carceral system. Underground Scholars Initiative, UC Berkeley. https://americancultures.berkeley.edu/faculty/teaching-resources/language-guide-communicating-about-those-involved-carceral-system

12.

Chiricos

Barrick

Bales

Bontrager

(2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45(3), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00089.x

13.

Cohen

T. H.

Reaves

(2007). Pretrial release of felony defendants in state courts (NJC 214994; State Court Processing Statistics, 1990–2004). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

14.

Colbert

Paternoster

Bushway

S. D.

(2002). Do attorneys really matter? The empirical and legal case for the right of counsel at bail. Cardozo Law Review, 23(1), 101–165.

15.

Cooprider

(2009). Pretrial risk assessment and case classification: A case study. Federal Probation, 73(1), 12–15.

16.

Cox

(2020). The language of incarceration. Incarceration: An International Journal of Imprisonment, Detention, and Coercive Confinement, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632666320940859

17.

DeMichele

Baumgartner

Barrick

Comfort

Scaggs

Misra

(2019). What do criminal justice professionals think about risk assessment at pretrial. Federal Probation, 83(1), 32–41.

18.

DeMichele

Baumgartner

Wenger

Barrick

Comfort

(2020). Public safety assessment: Predictive utility and differential prediction by race in Kentucky. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(2), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12481

19.

Demuth

Steffensmeier

(2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.222

20.

Desmarais

S. L.

Lowder

E. M.

(2019). Pretrial risk assessment tools: A primer for judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. MacArthur Foundation Safety and Justice Challenge. https://safetyandjusticechallenge.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Pretrial-Risk-Assessment-Primer-February-2019.pdf

21.

Desmarais

S. L.

Monahan

Austin

(2021). The empirical case for pretrial risk assessment instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(6), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211041651

22.

Desmarais

S. L.

Zottola

S. A.

Duhart Clarke

S. E.

Lowder

E. M.

(2021). Predictive validity of pretrial risk assessments: A systematic review of the literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(4), 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820932959

23.

de Vries Robbé

de Vogel

Douglas

K. S

. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2013.818162

24.

de Vries Robbé

de Vogel

Stam

. (2012). Protective factors for violence risk: The value for clinical practice. Psychology, 3(12A), 1259–1263. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.312A187

25.

Donovan

R. J.

Jalleh

(2000). Positive versus negative framing of a hypothetical infant immunization: The influence of involvement. Health Education & Behavior, 27(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700108

26.

Evans

S. A.

Salekin

K. L.

(2014). Involuntary civil commitment: Communicating with the court regarding “danger to other.” Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 325–336.

27.

Fagerlin

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Ubel

P. A.

Jankovic

Derry

H. A.

Smith

D. M.

(2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07304449

28.

Farole

D. J.

Jr. (2009). Problem solving and the American bench: A national survey of trial court judges. Justice System Journal, 30(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2009.10767914

29.

Guay

J.-P.

Parent

(2018). Broken legs, clinical overrides, and recidivism risk: An analysis of decisions to adjust risk levels with the LS/CMI. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817719482

30.

Hamilton

(2020). Risk assessment tools in the criminal legal system—Theory and practice: A resource guide. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/a92d7c30-32d4-4b49-9c57-6c14ed0b9894/riskassessmentreportnovember182020.pdf

31.

Heaton

Mayson

S. G.

Stevenson

(2017). The downstream consequences of misdemeanor pretrial detention. Stanford Law Review, 69(1), 711–794.

32.

Hilton

N. Z.

Carter

A. M.

Harris

G. T.

Sharpe

A. J.

(2008). Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507309337

33.

Hilton

N. Z.

Harris

G. T.

Rawson

Beach

C. A.

(2005). Communicating violence risk information to forensic decision makers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804270630

34.

Hilton

N. Z.

Scurich

Helmus

L. M.

(2015). Communicating the risk of violent and offending behavior: Review and introduction to this special issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2160

35.

Holbrook

M. A.

Dunbar

Miller

M. K.

(2022). Judges’ perceptions of systemic racism in the criminal justice system. Race and Justice. Advance online publication. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/21533687221087388

36.

Jones

C. E.

(2013). Give us free: Addressing racial disparities in bail determinations. N.Y.U. Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 16(1), 919–962.

37.

Kahneman

Tversky

(2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In MacLean

L. C.

Ziemba

W. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006

38.

Karnow

C. E.

(2008). Setting bail for public safety. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 13(1), 1–30.

39.

Kellough

Wortley

(2002). Remand for plea. Bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate decisions. The British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.1.186

40.

Kühberger

(1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2781

41.

Kwartner

P. P.

Lyons

P. M.

Boccaccini

M. T.

(2006). Judges’ risk communication preferences in risk for future violence cases. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2006.10471242

42.

Latessa

E. J.

Lovins

B. K.

Makarios

(2013). Validation of the Indiana Risk Assessment System: Final report. University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research. https://www.in.gov/courts/iocs/files/prob-risk-iras-final.pdf

43.

Latessa

E. J.

Smith

Lemke

Makarios

Lowenkamp

(2009). Creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final report. University of Cincinnati. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/reports/project_reports/ORAS_Final_Report.pdf

44.

Lawson

S. G.

Rising

S. J.

Grommon

Lowder

E. M.

(2021). Pretrial risk assessment tool adoption and pretrial operations. In Scott-Hayward

C. S.

Copp

J. E.

Demuth

(Eds.), Handbook on pretrial justice (pp. 276–295). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149842-19

45.

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. (2018). The use of pretrial “risk assessment” instruments: A shared statement of civil rights concerns. http://civilrightsdocs.info/pdf/criminal-justice/Pretrial-Risk-Assessment-Full.pdf

46.

Levin

I. P.

Gaeth

G. J.

Schreiber

Lauriola

(2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2983

47.

Lowder

E. M.

Diaz

C. L.

Grommon

Ray

B. R.

(2021). Effects of pretrial risk assessments on release decisions and misconduct outcomes relative to practice as usual. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101754

48.

Lowder

E. M.

Diaz

C. L.

Grommon

Ray

B. R.

(2022). Differential prediction and disparate impact of pretrial risk assessments in practice: A multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-27920-001

49.

Lowder

E. M.

Foudray

C. M.

(2021). Use of risk assessments in pretrial supervision decision-making and associated outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 67(11), 1765–1791. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211022642

50.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

DeMichele

Warren

L. K.

(2020). Replication and extension of the Lucas County PSA project. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3727443

51.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Whetzel

(2009). Federal pretrial risk assessment. Federal Probation, 76(1), 33–36.

52.

Marlowe

D. B.

Carey

S. M.

Chadick

C. D.

(2020). Employing standardized risk assessment in pretrial release decisions: Association with criminal justice outcomes and racial equity. Law and Human Behavior, 44(5), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000413

53.

Maroney

T. A.

Gross

J. J.

(2014). The ideal of the dispassionate judge: An emotion regulation perspective. Emotion Review, 6(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491989

54.

Maruna

Lebel

T. P.

Mitchell

Naples

(2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662762

55.

Mills

J. F.

Kroner

D. G.

(2006). The effect of base-rate information on the perception of risk for reoffense. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(3), 45–56.

56.

Minton

Zeng

Maruschak

(2021, March). Impact of COVID-19 on the local jail population, January-June 2020 (NCJ 255888). BJS Statistician. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/icljpjj20.pdf

57.

Monahan

Silver

(2003). Judicial decision thresholds for violence risk management. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2003.10471174

58.

Nabi

R. L.

Walter

Oshidary

Endacott

C. G.

Love-Nichols

Lew

Aune

(2020). Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing effect? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 47(8), 1107–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219861256

59.

O’keefe

D. J.

Jensen

J. D.

(2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054

60.

Orton

L. C.

Hogan

N. R.

Wormith

J. S.

(2021). An examination of the professional override of the level of service inventory–Ontario Revision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820942270

61.

Page

Scott-Hayward

C. S.

(2022). Bail and pretrial justice in the United States: A field of possibility. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920093024

62.

Philips

M. T.

(2004). Factors influencing release and bail decisions in New York City. New York Criminal Justice Agency. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=207123

63.

Philips

M. T.

(2012). A decade of bail research in New York City. New York City Criminal Justice Agency. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/DecadeBailResearch12.pdf

64.

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Steiner

(2016). Sex-based disparities in pretrial release decisions and outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 62(3), 308–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713482415

65.

Pretrial Justice Institute. (2013). The Colorado Pretrial Risk Assessment Tool (CPAT): Administration, scoring, and reporting manual (Version 1). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/colorado-pretrial-assessment-tool-cpat-administration-scoring-and

66.

Pretrial Justice Institute. (2019). Scan of pretrial practices 2019. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/61d1eb9e51ae915258ce573f/t/61df3e19dc500a1e42344351/1642020381052/Scan+of+Pretrial+Practices.pdf

67.

Pretrial Justice Institute. (2020). The case against pretrial risk assessment instruments. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/61d1eb9e51ae915258ce573f/t/61df300e0218357bb223d689/1642017935113/The+Case+Against+Pretrial+Risk+Assessment+Instruments–PJI+2020.pdf

68.

Public Health Management Corporation Research & Evaluation Group. (n.d.). Risk and Needs Triage (RANT®). https://research.phmc.org/products/criminal-justice-tools

69.

Redcross

Henderson

Miratrix

Valentine

(2019). Evaluation of pretrial justice system reforms that use the public safety assessment: Effects in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Supplemental Report 2 of 2). MDRC Center for Criminal Justice Research. https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/PSA_Mecklenburg_Brief2.pdf

70.

Sacks

Sainato

V. A.

Ackerman

A. R.

(2015). Sentenced to pretrial detention: A study of bail decisions and outcomes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9268-0

71.

Sanchez

Strenio

(2022). Stakeholder perceptions and potential barriers to pretrial release reform. Journal of Restoration, Rehabilitation, and Reentry, 2022(1), 1–19.

72.

Sawyer

Wagner

(2020). Mass incarceration: The whole pie. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2020.html

73.

Schapira

M. M.

Walker

C. M.

Miller

Fletcher

K. E.

Ganschow

P. S.

Jacobs

E. A.

Imbert

O’Connell

Neuner

J. M.

(2014). Development and validation of the numeracy understanding in Medicine Instrument short form. Journal of Health Communication, 19(Suppl. 2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.933916

74.

Schlesinger

(2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22(2), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500088929

75.

Scott-Hayward

C. S.

Fradella

H. F.

(2019). Punishing poverty: How bail and pretrial detention fuel inequalities in the criminal justice system. University of California Press.

76.

Scurich

(2018). The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(5), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2382

77.

Scurich

John

R. S.

(2011). The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9218-4

78.

Slovic

Monahan

MacGregor

D. G.

(2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005595519944

79.

Steiger

Kühberger

(2018). A meta-analytic re-appraisal of the framing effect. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000321

80.

Stevenson

M. T.

(2018). Assessing risk assessment in action. Minnesota Law Review, 103(1), 303–384.

81.

Stevenson

M. T.

Doleac

J. L.

(2019). Algorithmic risk assessment in the hands of humans. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3489440

82.

Stevenson

M. T.

Mayson

S. G.

(2017). Pretrial detention and bail. In Luna

(Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform (Vol. 3, pp. 21–48). Academy for Justice.

83.

Stewart

D. K.

Zottola

S. A.

Desmarais

S. L.

Duhart Clarke

Monahan

(2022, March). Public and professional opinions about judicial responsibilities and decision-making [Paper presentation]. American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, United States.

84.

Terranova

V. A.

Ward

Slepicka

Azari

A. M.

(2020). Perceptions of pretrial risk assessment: An examination across role in the initial pretrial release decision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(8), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820932204

85.

VanNostrand

(2003). Assessing risk among pretrial defendants in Virginia: The Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services. https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/sites/dcjs.virginia.gov/files/publications/corrections/assessing-risk-among-pretrial-defendants-virginia-virginia-pretrial-risk-assessment-instrument.pdf

86.

VanNostrand

Lowenkamp

C. T.

(2013). Assessing pretrial risk without a defendant interview. Arnold Foundation. https://craftmediabucket.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/PDFs/LJAF_Report_no-interview_FNL.pdf

87.

Vincent

G. M.

Viljoen

J. L.

(2020). Racist algorithms or systemic problems? Risk assessments and racial disparities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1576–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820954501

88.

Waters

E. A.

Weinstein

N. D.

Colditz

G. A.

Emmons

(2006). Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. Journal of Health Communication, 11(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500526695

89.

Willis

G. M.

Letourneau

E. J.

(2018). Promoting accurate and respectful language to describe individuals and groups. Sexual Abuse, 30(5), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218783799

90.

Wooldredge

Frank

Goulette

Travis

III . (2015). Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for Black defendants? Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 187–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12124

91.

Worden

A. P.

Morgan

K. A.

Shteynberg

R. V.

Davies

A. L. B.

(2018). What difference does a lawyer make? Impacts of early counsel on misdemeanor bail decisions and outcomes in rural and small town courts. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(6-7), 710–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417726133

92.

Zeng

Minton

T. D.

(2021). Jail inmates in 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ji19.pdf

93.

Zottola

S. A.

Duhart Clarke

S. E.

Desmarais

S. L.

(2022). Bail reform in the United States: The what, why, and how of third wave efforts. In Jeglic

Calkins

(Eds.), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States (pp. 143–169). Springer.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB