We use a person-centered approach to examine how patterns of risk and protective factors can change among youth on probation (N = 7,024). Data were collected using the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument. We used latent transition analysis to identify distinct subgroups at intake and exit; estimated probabilities of moving between groups; and examined recidivism rates. We selected the model with five groups and found that the groups at intake and exit were similar. We characterized the groups in order of declining risk: Highest Risk, Social Drug Risk, Individual Risk, Drug Risk, and Low Risk. Youth were most likely to move out of the Highest Risk group and most likely to stay in the two lowest risk groups. Common transitions yielded improved recidivism rates. This knowledge can inform case plans that will increase young people’s likelihood of moving into a lower risk group, thereby improving recidivism rates.
AltinasM.BiliciM. (2018). Evaluation of childhood trauma with respect to criminal behavior, dissociative experiences, adverse family experiences, and psychiatric backgrounds among prison inmates. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 82, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.12.006
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. L.WormithJ. S. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: LS/CMI manual. Multi-Health Systems.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. L.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
5.
AppletonC.SmithL.RudesD. (2023). Actionable motivational interviewing: Gendered perceptions of probation officer-client relationships. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.dbffca30
6.
BaglivioM. T.WolffK. T.JackowskiK.GreenwaldM. A. (2017a). A multilevel examination of risk/need change Scores, community context, and successful reentry of committed juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204015596052
7.
BaglivioM. T.WolffK. T.PiqueroA. R.HowellJ. C.GreenwaldM. A. (2017b). Risk assessment trajectories of youth during juvenile justice residential placement: Examining risk, promotive, and “buffer” scores. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(3), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816668918
BarnesA. R.CampbellN. A.AndersonV. R.CampbellC. A.OnifadeE.DavidsonW. S. (2016). Validity of initial, exit, and dynamic juvenile risk assessment: An examination across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1107004
10.
Barnes-LeeA. R. (2020). Development of protective factors for reducing juvenile reoffending: A strengths-based approach to risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(11), 1371–1389. https://doi.org/10.177/0093854820949601
11.
BontaJ.BourgonG.RuggeT.ScottT. L.YessineA. K.GutierrezL.LiJ. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385481142067
12.
BorumR.BartelP. A.ForthA. E. (2005). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth. In GrissoT.VincentG.SeagraveD. (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 311–323). Guilford Press.
13.
BrownS. L.WanamakerK. A.GreinerL.ScottT.SkillingT. A. (2021). Complex trauma and criminogenic needs in a youth justice sample: A gender-informed latent profile analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820964513
14.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley.
15.
FarringtonD. P.TtofiM. M. (2012). Protective and promotive factors in the development of offending. In BliesenerT.BeelmanA.StemmlerM. (Eds.), Antisocial behavior and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (pp. 71–88). Hogrefe Publishing.
16.
FelittiV. J.AndaR. F.NordenbergD.WilliamsonD. F.SpitzA. M.EdwardsV.KossM. P.MarksJ. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
17.
FoxB.KortrightK.GillL.MoraD. O.MouleR. K.VeronaE. (2021). Heterogeneity in the continuity and change of early and adult risk factor profiles of incarcerated individuals: A latent transition analysis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204020939648
18.
GilmanA. B.HillK. G.HawkinsJ. D. (2015). When is a youth’s debt to society paid? Examining the long-term consequences of juvenile incarceration for adult functioning. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0002-5
19.
HiltermanE. L. B.VermuntJ. K.NichollsT. L.BongersI. L.van NieuwenhuizenC. (2019). Profiles of SAVRY risk and protective factors within male and female juvenile offenders: A latent class and latent transition analysis. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(4), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2019.1580803
HogeR. D.AndrewsD. A. (2011). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI 2.0): User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.
22.
JonesN. J.BrownS. L.RobinsonD.FreyD. (2016). Validity of the youth assessment and screening instrument: A juvenile justice tool incorporating risks, needs, and strengths. Law and Human Behavior, 40(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000170
23.
KennealyP. J.SkeemJ. L.HernandezI. R. (2017). Does staff see what experts see? Accuracy of front line staff in scoring juveniles’ risk factors. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000316
24.
LatessaE. J.SmithP.SchweitzerM.LabrecqueR. M. (2013). Evaluation of the effective practices in community supervision model (EPICS) in Ohio [Unpublished manuscript]. Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
25.
LeeJ. S.TaxmanF. S. (2020). Using latent class analysis to identify the complex needs of youth on probation. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105087
26.
LeigeyM. E.ReedK. L. (2010). A woman’s life before serving life: Examining the negative pre-incarceration life events of female life-sentenced inmates. Women & Criminal Justice, 20(4), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2010.512229
27.
MendelR. A. (2007). Beyond detention: System transformation through juvenile detention reform. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
28.
MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A.PitzerL.HawesS.PiqueroA.CardwellS. (2016). An examination of change in dynamic risk of offending over time among serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.008
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
30.
OnifadeE.DavidsonW.LivseyS.TurkeG.HortonC.MalinowskiJ.AtkinsonD.WimberlyD. (2008). Risk assessment: Identifying patterns of risk in young offenders with the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.02.006
Peterson-BadaliM.SkillingT.HaqaneeZ. (2015). Examining implementation of risk assessment in case management for youth in the justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814549595
33.
Royer-GagnierK.SkillingT. A.BrownS. L.MooreT. E.RawanaJ. S. (2016). The Strengths Assessment Inventory–Youth Version: An evaluation of the psychometric properties with male and female justice-involved youth. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000199
34.
SchwalbeC. S.MacyR. J.DayS. H.FraserM. W. (2008). Classifying offenders: An application of latent class analysis to needs assessment in juvenile justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204007313383
SkeemJ. L.ScottE.MulveyE. P. (2014). Justice policy reform for high-risk juveniles: Using science to achieve large-scale crime reduction. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 709–739. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153707
37.
SmithP.SchweitzerM.LabrecqueR. M.LatessaE. J. (2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826
38.
ThurmanT.ChowdhuryS.TaxmanF. S. (2019). Fidelity measures for Risk-Need Assessment (RNA) tools usage in case plans. Corrections, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2019.1696252
39.
VieiraT. A.SkillingT. A.Peterson-BadaliM. (2009). Matching court-ordered services with treatment needs: Predicting treatment success with young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808331249
40.
WalkerS. C.BishopA. S.NuriusP. S.Logan-GreeneP. (2016). The heterogeneity of treatment needs for justice-involved girls: A typology using latent class analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815615162
XuX.LiD.ChuC. M.ChngG. S.RubyK. (2020). Understanding changes in youth offenders’ risk profiles: A latent transition analysis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019883922
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
