The authors conducted a prospective study of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) using a 5-year follow-up period and a sample of 480 male adolescents assessed by juvenile detention personnel. Analyses were conducted to examine differential validity by race-ethnicity, the relative contribution of structured professional judgments of risk level, and the incremental validity of dynamic to static risk factors. Overall, the SAVRY total scores were significantly predictive of any type of reoffending with some variability across racial-ethnic groups. Youths rated as moderate to high risk by evaluators using structured professional judgment had greater odds of rearrest, but these risk ratings did not have incremental validity over numeric scores. Static factors were most strongly predictive of nonviolent rearrest, but dynamic factors (social-contextual) were the most predictive of violent rearrest. Implications for use of risk-needs assessment tools in juvenile justice programs and areas in need of further investigation are discussed.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55.
3.
Austin, J. ( 2006). How much risk can we take? The misuse of risk assessment in corrections. Federal Probation, 70(2), 58-63.
4.
Baird, C. (February 2009). A question of evidence: A critique of risk assessment models used in the justice system. Special report. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
5.
Bonta, J. ( 1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Borum, R. ( 1996). Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. American Psychologist , 51, 945-956.
7.
Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. ( 2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) . Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
Borum, R., & Douglas K. ( 2003). New directions in violence risk assessment. Psychiatric Times, 20, 102-103.
9.
Borum, R., Lodewijks, H., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. ( 2009). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) . In K. Douglas & R. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 63-80). New York, NY: Routledge .
10.
Chapman, J.F., Desai, R.A., Falzer, P.R., & Borum, R. ( 2006). Violence risk and race in a sample of youth in juvenile detention: The potential to reduce disproportionate minority contact . Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 170-184.
11.
Chinn, S. ( 2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine , 19, 3127-3131.
12.
Cicchetti, D.V., & Sparrow, S.A. ( 1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior . American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
13.
Corrado, R.R., Vincent, G.M., Hart, S.D., & Cohen, I.M. ( 2004). Predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version for general and violent recidivism. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 5-22.
14.
Desai, R.A., Falzer, P.R., Chapman, J.F., & Borum, R. ( 2009). Mental illness, violence risk, and race in juvenile detention: Implications for disproportionate minority contact. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
Dolan, M.C., & Rennie, C.E. ( 2008). The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct problems. Psychological Assessment , 20(1), 35-46.
16.
Douglas, K.S., Yeoman, M., & Boer, D.P. ( 2005). Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 479-510.
17.
Dvoskin, J.A., & Heilbrun, K. ( 2001). Risk assessment: Release decision-making toward resolving the great debate. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29(1), 6-10.
18.
Emily J. v. Rowland, 3:93CV1944 (RNC), Connecticut (1996).
19.
Fagan, J., & Zimring, F.E. ( 2000). The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Farrington, D.P., & Loeber, R. ( 1999). Transatlantic replicability of risk factors in the development of delinquency. In P. Cohen, C. Slomkowski, & L. N. Robins (Eds.), Historical and geographical influences on psychopathology (pp. 299-329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Farrington, D.P., & West, D.J. ( 1993). Criminal, penal, and life histories of chronic offenders: Risk and protective factors and early identification. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 3, 492-523.
22.
Flores, A.W., Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2006). Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 523-529.
23.
Ford, J.D., Chapman, J.F., Pearson, G., Borum, R., & Wolpaw, J.M. ( 2008). Psychometric status and clinical utility of the MAYSI-2 with girls and boys in juvenile detention. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30, 87-99.
24.
Forth, A.E., Kosson, D.S., & Hare, R.D. ( 2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Youth Version . Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems .
25.
Gammelgård, M., Koivisto, A., Eronen, M., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2008). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among institutionalised adolescents. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology , 19, 352-370.
26.
Gottfredson, D., & Tonry, M. ( 1988). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision-making . Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
27.
Grisso, T. ( 2005). Evaluating the properties of instruments for screening and assessment. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
Grisso, T., Vincent, G.M., & Seagrave, D. ( 2005). Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice . New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. ( 1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293-323.
30.
Grubin, D., & Wingate, S. ( 1996). Sexual offence recidivism: Prediction versus understanding . Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 6, 349-359.
31.
Guarino-Ghezzi, S., & Byrne, J.M. ( 1989). Developing a model of structured decision making in juvenile corrections: The Massachusetts experience. Crime & Delinquency , 35, 270-302.
32.
Guy, L.S. ( 2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
33.
Hemphill, J.F., Hare, R.D., & Wong, S. ( 1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139-170.
34.
Hoge, R.D. ( 2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 380-396.
35.
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. ( 2006). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User’s manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
36.
Holmbeck, G.N. ( 1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610.
37.
Ignelzi, J., Stinson, B., Raia, J., Osinowo, T., Ostrowski, L., & Schwirian, J. ( 2007). Utilizing risk-of-violence findings for continuity of care. Psychiatric Services, 58, 452-454.
38.
Kraemer, H.C., Kazdin, A.E., Offord, D.R., Kessler, R.C., Jensen, P.S., & Kupfer, D.J. ( 1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(4), 337-343.
39.
Kropp, P.R., & Hart, S.D. ( 2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 101-118.
40.
Lipsey, M.W., & Derzon, J.H. ( 1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Litwack, T.R. ( 2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-443.
42.
Lodewijks, H.P.B., de Ruiter, C., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: A study in three samples of adolescent offenders . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 568-587.
43.
Lodewijks, H.P.B., Doreleijers, T.A.H., & de Ruiter, C. ( 2008). SAVRY risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents: Relation to sentencing and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 696-709.
44.
Lodewijks, H.P.B., Doreleijers, T.A.H., de Ruiter, C., & Borum, R. ( 2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth during residential treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 263-271.
45.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., Brusman-Lovins, L., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2004). Assessing the inter-rater agreement of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (Unpublished manuscript). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
46.
Moffitt, T.E., & Caspi, A. ( 2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females . Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 355-375.
47.
Mulvey, E.P. ( 2005). Risk assessment in juvenile justice policy and practice . In K. Heilbrun & N. E. S. Goldstein (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention (pp. 209-231). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
48.
Mulvey, E.P., & Iselin, A.R. ( 2008). Improving professional judgments of risk and amenability in juvenile justice. Future of Children, 18, 35-57.
49.
Olver, M.E., Stockdale, K.C., & Wormith, J.S. ( 2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 36, 329-353.
50.
Penney, S., Lee, Z., Moretti, M., & Bartel, P. ( 2007). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Poster presentation at Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission, Vancouver, BC.
51.
Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Cormier, C.A. ( 1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
52.
Skowyra, K.R., & Cocozza, J.J. ( 2007). Blueprint for change: A comprehensive model for the identification and treatment of youth with mental health needs in contact with the juvenile justice system. Delmar, NY: National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.
53.
Turner, M.G., Hartman, J.L., Exum, M.L., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2007). Examining the cumulative effects of protective factors: Resiliency among a national sample of high-risk youths. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46, 81-111.
54.
Viljoen, J.L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chavez, V., Ullman, D., & Lawrence, L. ( 2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 5-23.
55.
Vincent, G.M., Terry, A., & Maney, S. ( 2009). Risk/needs tools for antisocial behavior and violence among youthful populations. In J. Andrade (Ed.), Handbook of violence risk assessment and treatment for forensic mental health practitioners (pp. 337-424). New York, NY : Springer.
56.
Welsh, J.L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chattha, H.K., & Meyers, J.R. ( 2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment , 15, 104-115.
57.
Werner, E.E., & Smith, R.S. ( 1992). Overcoming the odds: High-risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
