Discretionary Prosecutorial Decision-Making: Gender,Sexual Orientation,and Bias in Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Prosecutors exercise substantial discretion within the criminal justice process, potentially allowing for discrepant treatment of criminal cases. The purpose of this research was to examine the association between prosecutorial implicit biases and victim gender and sexual orientation in an intimate partner violence (IPV) case. Participants, 201 prosecutors from across the United States, completed two Implicit Association Tests to measure implicit gender attitudes and implicit attitudes regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer individuals. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions (opposite-sex couple/female victim, opposite-sex couple/male victim, same-sex couple/female victim, same-sex couple/male victim) and read a case file of an alleged IPV arrest. Consistent with our hypotheses, prosecutors were 65% more likely to prosecute under the severest criminal penalty when the victim was female or included an opposite-sex couple. However, we found no evidence that implicit biases related to prosecutorial decisions.

Keywords

prosecutor implicit bias decision-making gender intimate partner violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aberson

C. L.

(2019). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315171500

Ahmed

Aldén

Hammarstedt

(2013). Perceptions of gay, lesbian, and heterosexual domestic violence among undergraduates in Sweden. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 7(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3022

Ahmed

Jindasurat

(2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and HIV affected hate violence in 2013. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs. https://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2013_ncavp_hvreport_final.pdf

Ahola

A. S.

Hellström

Å.

Christianson

S. Å

. (2010). Is justice really blind? Effects of crime descriptions, defendant gender and appearance, and legal practitioner gender on sentences and defendant evaluations in a mock trial. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 17(2), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710903566896

Banaji

M. R.

Hardin

C. D.

(1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x

Blanton

Jaccard

Strauts

Mitchell

Tetlock

P. E.

(2015). Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1468–1481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038379

Carnes

Devine

Baier Manwell

Byars-Winston

Fine

Ford

C. E.

Forscher

Issac

Kaatz

Magua

Palta

Sheridan

(2015). The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 90(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552

Coker

A. L.

Davis

K. E.

Arias

Desai

Sanderson

Brandt

H. M.

Smith

P. H.

(2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23(4), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7

Cox

MacNeil

Lind

(in press). Gender, sex, and the prosecution of intimate partner violence. In Russell

Hammel

(Eds.), Intimate partner violence beyond the gender paradigm: A criminal justice perspective. Oxford University Press.

10.

Cox

Meaux

L. T.

Stanziani

Coffey

C. A.

Daquin

(2021). Partiality in prosecution? Discretionary prosecutorial decision making and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), 8471–8493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519849689

11.

Curry

T. R.

Lee

Fernando Rodriguez

(2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 50(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011128703256265

12.

Conaway

Bethune

(2015). Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction? Online Learning, 19(3), 162–178. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1067526

13.

Devine

(2012). Juror Decision Making: The State of the Science. New York University Press.

14.

Endendijk

J. J.

Derks

Mesman

(2018). Does parenthood change implicit gender-role stereotypes and behaviors? Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12452

15.

Endendijk

J. J.

Groeneveld

M. G.

Van Berkel

S. R.

Hallers-Haalboom

E. T.

Mesman

Bakermans-Kranenburg

M. J.

(2013). Gender stereotypes in the family context: Mothers, fathers, and siblings. Sex Roles, 68, 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0265-4

16.

Fernando Rodriguez

Curry

T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x

17.

Frederick

Stemen

(2012). The anatomy of discretion: An analysis of prosecutorial decision making technical report (Report for Award No. 2009-IJ-CX-0040). Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/240334.pdf

18.

Frohmann

(1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/800530

19.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

(2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72(9), 861–871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000238

20.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

Nosek

B. A.

(2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000016

21.

Greenwald

A. G.

Lai

C. K.

(2020). Implicit social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837

22.

Greenwald

A. G.

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/GB&N.JPSP.2003.pdf

23.

Harris

D. A.

(2011). The interaction and relationship between prosecutors and police officers in the US, and how this affects police reform efforts (Working Paper No. 2011-19, University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1864118

24.

Heaton

Mayson

Stevenson

(2017). The downstream consequences of misdemeanor pretrial detention. Stanford Law Review, 69, 711–794. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/1148

25.

Herzog

Oreg

(2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law & Society, 42(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00334.x

26.

Jackson

N. A.

(Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of domestic violence. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203942215

27.

Jacoby

J. E.

Ratledge

E. C.

(2016). The power of the prosecutor: Gatekeepers of the criminal justice system. ABC-CLIO. http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/21784

28.

Kaiser

K. A.

O’Neal

E. N.

Spohn

(2017). “Victim refuses to cooperate”: A focal concerns analysis of victim cooperation in sexual assault cases. Victims & Offenders, 12(2), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1078864

29.

Kang

Bennett

M. W.

Carbado

D. W.

Casey

Dasgupta

Faigman

Godsil

Greenwald

A. G.

Levinson

Mnookin

(2012). Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1124–1186. https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/1312

30.

Kerstetter

W. A.

(1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267–313. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1143908

31.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

C. C.

(2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52(3), 514–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12047

32.

Langenderfer-Magruder

Whitfield

D. L.

Walls

N. E.

Kattari

S. K.

Ramos

(2016). Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: Comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514556767

33.

Lantz

(2020). Victim, police, and prosecutorial responses to same-sex intimate partner violence: A comparative approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219894429

34.

MacNeil

Cox

Daquin

(2020, August). Gender role attitudes and prosecutorial decision-making [Poster presentation]. American Psychological Association, Virtual.

35.

Max

Rice

D. P.

Finkelstein

Bardwell

R. A.

Leadbetter

(2004). The economic toll of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Violence and Victims, 19(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.3.259.65767

36.

McDonald

W. F.

(1979). The prosecutor. SAGE.

37.

Monteith

M. J.

Ashburn-Nardo

Voils

C. I.

Czopp

A. M.

(2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1029

38.

Neal

T. M. S.

Cramer

R. J.

(2017). Moral disengagement in legal judgments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 14(4), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12163

39.

Neal

T. M. S.

Guadagno

R. E.

Eno

C. A.

Brodsky

S. L.

(2012). Warmth and competence on the witness stand: Implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40(4), 488–497. http://www.jaapl.org/content/40/4/488.long

40.

National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2020). Domestic violence. https://assets.speakcdn.com/assets/2497/domestic_violence-2020080709350855.pdf?1596811079991

41.

National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs. (2015). National report on hate violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and HIV-affected communities released today. https://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2015_NCAVP_HVReport_MR.pdf

42.

O’Neill

M. E.

(2004). Understanding federal prosecutorial declinations: An empirical analysis of predictive factors. American Criminology Law Review, 41, 1439–1498.

43.

Onyeader

I. N.

Wittlin

N. M.

Burke

S. E.

Dovidio

J. F.

Perry

S. P.

Hardeman

R. R.

Dyrbye

L. N.

Herrin

Phelan

S. M.

van Ryn

(2020). The value of interracial contact for reducing anti-black bias among non-black physicians: A Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation (CHANGE) Study report. Psychological Science, 31(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619879139

44.

Oringher

Samuelson

K. W.

(2011). Intimate partner violence and the role of masculinity in male same-sex relationships. Traumatology, 17(2) 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765610395620

45.

Orton

J. D.

Weick

K. E.

(1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308154

46.

Oswald

F. L.

Mitchell

Blanton

Jaccard

Tetlock

P. E.

(2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032734

47.

Oswald

F. L.

Mitchell

Blanton

Jaccard

Tetlock

P. E.

(2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000023

48.

Payne

B. K.

Cheng

C. M.

Govorun

Stewart

B. D.

(2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277

49.

Peitzmeier

S. M.

Malik

Kattari

Marrow

Stephenson

Agenor

Reisner

S. L.

(2020). Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), e1–e14. dhttps://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305774

50.

Peterman

L. M.

Dixon

C. G.

(2003). Domestic violence between same-sex partners: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00223.x

51.

Petersen

(2017). Examining the sources of racial bias in potentially capital cases: A case study of police and prosecutorial discretion. Race and Justice, 7(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716645842

52.

Poorman

P. B.

Seelau

E. P.

Seelau

S. M.

(2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same sex relationships and implications for criminal justice and mental health responses. Violence and Victims, 18(6), 659–669. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.6.659

53.

Redlich

A. D.

Bibas

Edkins

V. A.

Madon

(2017). The psychology of defendant plea decision making. American Psychologist, 72(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040436339

54.

Reflective Democracy Campaign. (2015). Justice for all? https://wholeads.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Justice-For-All-Report_31319.pdf

55.

Renzetti

C. M.

Curran

D. J.

Maier

S. L.

(2012). Women, men, and society. Pearson.

56.

Robertson

Baughman

S. B.

Wright

M. S.

(2019). Race and class: A randomized experiment with prosecutors. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(4), 807–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12235

57.

Romain

D. M.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2016). Chivalry revisited: Gender, race/ethnicity, and offense type on domestic violence charge reduction. Feminist Criminology, 11(2), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085115580389

58.

Sales

B. D.

Krauss

D. A.

(2015). The psychology of law: Human behavior, legal institutions, and law. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14593-000

59.

Samons

(2012). Same-sex domestic violence: The need for affirmative legal protections at all levels of government. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice, 22, 417–439.

60.

Sanger

Lynch

(2018). “You have to bow right here”: Heteronormative scripts and intimate partner violence in women’s same-sex relationships. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1338755

61.

Scherr

K. C.

Redlich

A. D.

Kassin

S. M.

(2020). Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691619896608

62.

Seelau

E. P.

Seelau

S. M.

Poorman

P. B.

(2003). Gender and role-based perceptions of domestic abuse: Does sexual orientation matter? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(2), 119–214.

63.

Smith

S. G.

Zhang

Basile

K. C.

Merrick

M. T.

Wang

Kresnow

Chen

(2018). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 Data brief- updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf

64.

Sorenson

S. B.

Thomas

K. A.

(2009). Views of intimate partner violence in same- and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00602.x

65.

Spohn

(1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9(3–4), 365–399. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088740349900900305

66.

Spohn

Beichner

(2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0887403400011002004

67.

Spohn

Tellis

(2014). Policing and prosecuting sexual assault. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

68.

Stanziani

Cox

Coffey

C. A.

(2018). Adding insult to injury: Sex, sexual orientation, and juror decision-making in a case of intimate partner violence. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(10), 1325–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1374066

69.

Stanziani

Newman

A. K.

Cox

Coffey

C. A.

(2020). Role call: Sex, gender roles, and intimate partner violence. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 26(3), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1652746

70.

Stockman

Hayashi

Campbell

J. C.

(2015). Intimate partner violence and its health impact on ethnic minority women. Journal of Women’s Health, 24(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4879

71.

Tonry

(2015). Federal sentencing “reform” since 1984: The awful as enemy of the good. Crime and Justice, 44, 99–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/681666

72.

Woodyatt

C. R.

Stephenson

(2016). Emotional intimate partner violence experienced by men in same-sex relationships. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18, 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1175027

73.

(2016). Racial/ethnic discrimination and prosecution: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815628026

74.

Wang

Bastin

(2012). Beyond reaction times: Incorporating mouse-tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process. Social Cognition, 30(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.3.289