Changes in the Use of Telehealth Services and Use of Technology for Communication in U.S. Community Supervision Agencies Since COVID-19

Abstract

The U.S. community corrections system supervises and provides services for nearly 4.4 million individuals. This study explored agency responses during the COVID-19 pandemic using data from 347 surveys of community supervision directors. We examined whether agency and local geographical factors were associated with increased use of telehealth services for mental health, substance use disorders, and criminal behavior. We also assessed whether these factors were significant predictors of changes in agencies’ supervision strategies. Findings indicated a positive association between prepandemic access to telecommunications technology and use of telehealth services, with observed differences regarding urbanicity and type of agency. Agencies with more COVID-19 mitigation strategies tended to avoid in-person contact. Given the vast needs and increased risks present within the community supervision population, it is important to understand the barriers and facilitators associated with innovation and change in the post-COVID-19 era to inform future reform efforts.

Keywords

community supervision probation parole COVID-19 telehealth mental health substance use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abouk

Heydari

(2021). The immediate effect of COVID-19 policies on social-distancing behavior in the United States. Public Health Reports, 136(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920976575

R. K.

Fagan

T. J.

Magaletta

P. R.

Morgan

R. D.

Nussbaum

White

T. W.

(2007). Innovations in correctional assessment and treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(7), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301555

Baillargeon

(2009). Accessing antiretroviral therapy following release from prison. JAMA, 301(8), 848–857. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.202

Ballard

Mullendore

(2002). Legal issues related to electronic monitoring programs. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 15, 75–78.

Barnes

G. C.

Hyatt

J. M.

Ahlman

L. C.

Kent

D. T. L.

(2012). The effects of low-intensity supervision for lower-risk probationers: Updated results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.679874

Batastini

A. B.

Jones

A. C. T.

Lester

M. E.

Davis

R. M.

(2020). Initiation of a multidisciplinary telemental health clinic for rural justice-involved populations: Rationale, recommendations, and lessons learned. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(7), 2156–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22424

Batastini

A. B.

King

C. M.

Morgan

R. D.

McDaniel

(2016). Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services, 13(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000042

Belshaw

S. H.

(2011). Supervising probations on the information superhighway: Towards an understanding of minimum supervision level probationers in a large Texas county. International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing, 7, 98–106.

Binswanger

I. A.

Redmond

Steiner

J. F.

Hicks

L. S.

(2012). Health disparities and the criminal justice system: An agenda for further research and action. Journal of Urban Health, 89(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9614-1

10.

Bouchard

Paquin

Payeur

Allard

Rivard

Fournier

Renaud

Lapierre

(2004). Delivering cognitive-behavior therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia in videoconference. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 10(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/153056204773644535

11.

Burrell

W. D.

Gable

R. S.

(2008). From B. F. Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart: The past, present, and future of electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3), 101–118.

12.

Clark

C. B.

McCullumsmith

C. B.

Waesche

M. C.

Islam

M. A.

Francis

Cropsey

K. L.

(2013). HIV-risk characteristics in community corrections. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 7(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182781806

13.

Conway

(2007). The Journal of Offender Monitoring 2008-2009 electronic monitoring survey. The Journal of Offender Monitoring, 20(1), 1–72.

14.

DeMichele

(2020). Research considerations for using electronic technologies with community supervision. In Lattimore

P. K.

Huebmer

B. M.

Taxman

F. S.

(Eds.), Handbook on moving corrections and sentencing forward (pp. 79–89). Routledge.

15.

Dillman

D. A.

Smyth

J. D.

Christian

L. M.

(2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.

16.

Dominey

Coley

Ellis Devitt

Lawrence

(2020). Remote supervision: Getting the balance right. Center for Community, Gender, and Social Justice; Institute of Criminology; University of Cambridge and KSS CRC Research and Policy Unit.

17.

EXiT. (2021). Response tracker. https://www.exitprobationparole.org/covid-19-response

18.

Fearn

N. E.

Vaughn

M. G.

Nelson

E. J.

Salas-Wright

C. P.

DeLisi

Qian

(2016). Trends and correlates of substance use disorders among probationers and parolees in the United States 2002–2014. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.003

19.

Fullman

Bang-Jensen

Amano

Adolph

Wilkerson

(2021). State-level social distancing policies in response to COVID-19 in the United States. http://www.covid19statepolicy.org/

20.

Gupta

Nguyen

T. D.

Lozano Rojas

Raman

Lee

Bento

Simon

K. I.

Wing

(2020). Tracking public and private responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: Evidence from state and local government actions. National Bureau of Economic Research, 7(4), 361–404. https://doi.org/10.1086/716197

21.

Hauser

Peck

J. H.

(2017). The intersection of crime seriousness, discretion, and race: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 24(1), 166–192.

22.

Health Resources & Service Administration. (n.d.). Area health resources files. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/ahrf

23.

Health Resources & Services Administration. (2021). Getting started with telehealth. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/getting-started/

24.

Huskamp

H. A.

Busch

A. B.

Souza

Uscher-Pines

Rose

Wilcock

Landon

B. E.

Mehrotra

(2018). How is telemedicine being used in opioid and other substance use disorder treatment? Health Affairs, 37(12), 1940–1947. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05134

25.

Jaffee

D. H.

Lee

Huynh

Haskell

T. P.

(2020). Health inequalities in the use of telehealth in the United States in the lens of COVID-19. Population Health Management, 23(5), 368–377.

26.

Kaeble

(2020). Probation and parole in the United States, 2017-2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). U.S. Department of Justice and Office of Justice Programs.

27.

Kaiser Family Foundation. (n.d.). Status of state action on the Medicaid expansion decision. https://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-activity-around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable-care-act/?currentTimeframe=0%7B%5C

28.

Kirschstein

M. A.

Singh

J. P.

Rossegger

Endgrass

Graf

(2021). International survey on the use of emerging technologies among forensive and correctional mental health professionals. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211042057

29.

Larsen

Hudnall Stamm

Davis

Magaletta

P. R.

(2004). Prison telemedicine and telehealth utilization in the United States: State and federal perceptions of benefits and barriers. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 10(supplement 2), S-81–S-90. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2004.10.S-81

30.

Latessa

E. J.

(2004). The challenge of change: Correctional programs and evidence-based practices. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(4), 547–560.

31.

Lin

L. A.

Fernandez

A. C.

Bonar

E. E.

(2020). Telehealth for substance-using populations in the age of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Recommendations to enhance adoption. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(12), 1209–1210. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1698

32.

Lowes

(2001). Telemedicine. Medical Economics, 78(3), 24–24.

33.

Marlow

White

M. C.

Chesla

C. A.

(2010). Barriers and facilitators: Parolees’ perceptions of community health care. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 16(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345809348201

34.

McCord

C. E.

Saenz

J. J.

Armstrong

T. W.

Elliott

T. R.

(2015). Training the next generation of counseling psychologists in the practice of telepsychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 28(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1053433

35.

National Center for State Courts. (2020). Corona virus and the courts. https://www.ncsc.org/newsroom/public-health-emergency

36.

National Academy for State Health Policy. (2021). Each state’s COVID-19 reopening and reclosing plans and mask requirements. https://www.nashp.org/governors-prioritize-health-for-all/

37.

New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. (2018). What is telehealth?. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0268

38.

Nguyen

T. D.

Saloner

Stein

B. D.

(2021). Buprenorphine opioid treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Reply. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(8), 1135–1135. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0774

39.

Ogden

T. G.

Horrocks

(2000). Pagers, digital audio, and kiosk: Officer assistants. Federal Probation, 65(2), 35–44.

40.

Schuchat

(2020). Public health response to the initiation and spread of pandemic COVID-19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(18), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6918e2

41.

Schwartzapfel

(2020, April 03). Probation and parole officers are rethinking their rules as coronavirus spreads. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/04/03/probation-and-parole-officers-are-rethinking-their-rules-as-coronavirus-spreads

42.

Skubby

Bonfine

Novisky

Munetz

M. R.

Ritter

(2013). Crisis intervention team (CIT) programs in rural communities: A focus group study. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(6), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9517-y

43.

Swan

Campbell

Lowe

(2020). Pandemic preparedness and response among community supervision agencies: The importance of partnerships for future planning. Abt Associates. https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/APPA/pubs/PPRCSA.PDF

44.

USA Facts. (2020). U.S. COVID-19 cases and deaths by state. https://usafacts.org/visualizations/coronavirus-covid-19-spread-map/

45.

Uscher-Pines

Sousa

Raja

Mehrotra

Barnett

Huskamp

H. A.

(2020). Treatment of opioid use disorder during COVID-19: Experiences of clinicians transitioning to telemedicine. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 118, Article 108124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108124

46.

Vaughn

M. G.

DeLisi

Beaver

K. M.

Perron

B. E.

Abdon

(2012). Toward a criminal justice epidemiology: Behavioral and physical health of probationers and parolees in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.03.001

47.

Vera Institute of Justice. (2018). Incarceration trends [Data set and code book]. http://trends.vera.org/

48.

Vera Institute of Justice. (2020). Coronavirus-guidance-parole-probation-clemency.pdf. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/coronavirus-guidance-parole-probation-clemency.pdf

49.

Viglione

Alward

L. M.

Lockwood

Bryson

(2020). Adaptations to COVID-19 in community corrections agencies across the United States. Victims & Offenders, 15(7–8), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1818153

50.

Viglione

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Low risk offenders under probation supervision: Risk management and the risk-needs-responsivity framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818790299

51.

Wilson

J. A.

Naro

Austin

J. F.

(2007). Innovations in probation: Assessing New York City’s automated reporting system. JFA Associates.

52.

World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB