Substance Use and Peer Associations: How Relationships Between Women on Community Supervision and Their Supervising Officers Matter

Abstract

The growth in the population of women on probation and/or parole has prompted the need for research that examines static and dynamic risk predictors for recidivism among them, particularly substance use and negative peer associations. Using a longitudinal study of 402 drug-involved and justice-involved women on probation/parole in 16 Michigan counties, this study employed the Dual-Role Relationship Inventory—Short Form (DRI-SF) and personal characteristics to examine how the perceptions of women under community supervision regarding their supervising officers correlated to risks for substance use and negative peer associations. We found those perceptions to be robust predictors of substance use and negative peer associations among our sample. The dynamics of that correlation are discussed, as are implications for practice.

Keywords

substance use women community corrections probation parole

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

R. J. L.

(2019). Sexual assault victimization, fear of sexual assault, and self-protective behaviors: A test of general strain theory. Victims & Offenders, 14(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1608882

Bachman

Kerrison

Paternoster

O’Connell

Smith

(2016). Desistance for a long-term drug-involved sample of adult offenders: The importance of identity transformation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815604012

Blasko

B. L.

Friedmann

P. D.

Rhodes

A. G.

Taxman

F. S.

(2015). The parolee-parole officer relationship as a mediator of criminal justice outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(7), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814562642

Blasko

B. L.

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Are supervision practices procedurally fair? Development and predictive utility of a procedural justice measure for use in community corrections settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817749255

Connors

G. J.

DiClemente

C. C.

Dermen

K. H.

Kadden

Carroll

K. M.

Frone

M. R.

(2000). Predicting the therapeutic alliance in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.139

Cornacchione

Smith

S. W.

Morash

Bohmert

M. N.

Cobbina

J. E.

Kashy

D. A.

(2016). An exploration of female offenders’ memorable messages from probation and parole officers on the self-assessment of behavior from a control theory perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2015.1116705

DeMichele

Payne

(2018). Exploring probation officer styles and goals with individual, organizational, and social characteristics. European Journal of Probation, 10(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220318822845

Duwe

Clark

(2015). Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12123

Fedock

Covington

S. S.

(2017). Correctional programming and gender. In Pontell

(Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. (pp. 1–30). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.89

10.

Field

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

11.

Gharehgozli

Atal

(2020). Revisiting the gender wage gap in the United States. Economic Analysis and Policy, 66, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.04.008

12.

Gochyyev

Skeem

J. L.

(2019). Efficiently assessing firm, fair, and caring relationships: Short form of the Dual Role Relationship Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 352. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000672

13.

Gottlieb

Mahabir

(2022). Women and incarceration: Introducing a gendered lens into smart decarceration. Social Work, 67(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac012

14.

Holmstrom

A. J.

Adams

E. A.

Morash

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2018). Supportive messages female offenders receive from probation and parole officers about substance avoidance: Message perceptions and effects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(11), 1496–1517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817723395

15.

Kruttschnitt

Joosen

Bijleveld

(2019). Research note: Re-examining the gender responsive approach to female offending and its basis in the pathways literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(6), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1621415

16.

Lawrence

T. I.

Yelderman

L. A.

(2022). Attitudes toward substance use among females on parole: The effects of relationship quality between parole/probation officers and female offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2155649

17.

Lloyd

C. D.

Perley-Robertson

Serin

R. C.

(2020). Age and strengths in a community corrections sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 19(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2019.1684404

18.

Louden

J. E.

Skeem

J. L.

Camp

Christensen

(2008). Supervising probationers with mental disorder: How do agencies respond to violations? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(7), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808319042

19.

Manchak

S. M.

Skeem

J. L.

Kennealy

P. J.

Louden

J. E.

(2014). High-fidelity specialty mental health probation improves officer practices, treatment access, and rule compliance. Law and Human Behavior, 38(5), 450–461. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000076

20.

Marzan

Callinan

Livingston

Jiang

(2022). Alcohol consumption, heavy episodic drinking and the perpetration of antisocial behaviours in Australia. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 235, 109432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109432

21.

Miller

(2015). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer? Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.770546

22.

Morash

(2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs & services. Northeastern University Press.

23.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2015). The effects of probation or parole agent relationship style and women offenders’ criminogenic needs on offenders’ responses to supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814551602

24.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2016). The connection of probation/parole officer actions to women offenders’ recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815626490

25.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2018). Is the nature of communication relevant to the supportiveness of women’s relationships with probation and parole agents? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1629–1647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16689832

26.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2019). Technical violations, treatment and punishment responses, and recidivism of women on probation and parole. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(5), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417723425

27.

Morash

Smith

S. W.

Kashy

D. A.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2017). Probation/parole officer interactions with women offenders: Do relationship style and communication pattern predict outcomes? Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/E100410V1

28.

Mossman

(1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783

29.

Mueller

K. C.

Carey

M. T.

Noh

(2023). Revalidating the Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) in a major city: A survival analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 69(13–14), 2678–2698. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221087949

30.

Mueller

K. C.

Noh

Carey

M. T.

(2022). The impact of fair relationships on rule compliance for women under community supervision. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900992

31.

Neupert

S. D.

Desmarais

S. L.

Gray

J. S.

Cohn

A. M.

Doherty

Knight

(2017). Daily stressors as antecedents, correlates, and consequences of alcohol and drug use and cravings in community-based offenders. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000276

32.

Olson

D. E.

Lurigio

A. J.

(2000). Predicting probation outcomes: Factors associated with probation rearrest, revocations, and technical violations during supervision. Justice Research and Policy, 2(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.2.1.2000.73

33.

Olson

D. E.

Lurigio

A. J.

Seng

(2000). A comparison of female and male probationers: Characteristics and case outcomes. Women & Criminal Justice, 11(4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v11n04_05

34.

Porporino

F. J.

Motiuk

L. L.

(1995). The prison careers of mentally disordered offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(94)00025-5

35.

Reisig

M. D.

Holtfreter

Morash

(2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600869152

36.

Rhodes

B. E.

Gottfredson

N. C.

Hill

L. M.

(2018). Desistance and treatment seeking among women with substance use disorders. Qualitative Health Research, 28(8), 1330–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318767637

37.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.737

38.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7

39.

Roddy

A. L.

Morash

(2020). The connections of parole and probation agent communication patterns with female offenders’ job-seeking self-efficacy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(8), 774–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19895963

40.

Roddy

A. L.

Morash

Adams

E. A.

Holmstrom

A. J.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2019). The nature and effects of messages that women receive from probation and parole agents in conversations about employment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818811385

41.

Roddy

A. L.

Morash

Hoskins

K. M.

(2021). An exploration of employment-related personal projects undertaken by women on probation and parole. Feminist Criminology, 16(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085120951843

42.

Salem

B. E.

Nyamathi

Idemundia

Slaughter

Ames

(2013). At a crossroads: Reentry challenges and healthcare needs among homeless female ex-offenders. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 9(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1097%2Fjfn.0b013e31827a1e9d

43.

Sawyer

Wagner

(2023, March 14). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2023. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2023.html

44.

Schroeder

R. D.

Giordano

P. C.

Cernkovich

S. A.

(2007). Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology, 45(1), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00076.x

45.

Skeem

J. L.

Louden

J. E.

Polaschek

Camp

(2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397

46.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

(2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134069

47.

Smith

S. W.

Cornacchione

J. J.

Morash

Kashy

Cobbina

(2016). Communication style as an antecedent to reactance, self-efficacy, and restoration of freedom for drug-and alcohol-involved women on probation and parole. Journal of Health Communication, 21(5), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1103329

48.

Smith

S. W.

Morash

Walling

Adams

E. A.

Holmstrom

A. J.

(2019). Precursors to probation and parole agent intent to send informational, emotional, and esteem social support messages to female clients. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47, 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1615632

49.

Taxman

F. S.

Caudy

M. S.

(2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how: Empirical assessment of the complexity of criminogenic needs to inform correctional programming. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12116

50.

Vasilescu

(2022). Probation officers working with women offenders in the community: Evidence from Catalonia. Probation Journal, 69(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211070087

51.

Vasiljevic

Öjehagen

Andersson

(2020). Incremental validity of ambulatory assessment of acute dynamic risk in predicting time to recidivism among prisoners on parole. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(6), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1708356

52.

Welle

Falkin

(2000). The everyday policing of women with romantic codefendants: An ethnographic perspective. Women & Criminal Justice, 11(2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v11n02_03

53.

Wilfong

Golder

Logan

T. K.

Higgins

(2021). Examining the influence of financial assistance and employment services on the criminal justice outcomes of women on probation. Affilia, 36(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920919180

54.

Wodahl

E. J.

Mowen

T. J.

Garland

B. E.

(2021). The effect of individual characteristics and supervision experiences on the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(5), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420967070

55.

Wooditch

Tang

L. L.

Taxman

F. S.

(2014). Which criminogenic need changes are most important in promoting desistance from crime and substance use? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813503543