Development of Protective Factors for Reducing Juvenile Reoffending: A Strengths-Based Approach to Risk Assessment

Abstract

This study described the development of the Protective Factors for Reducing Juvenile Reoffending (PFRJR), a strengths-based measure to assess responsivity, guide case management, and potentially predict desistance. The study employed two diverse independent samples: a construction sample (N = 278) and a validation sample (N = 265) of juveniles under court supervision in a Midwestern juvenile court. Factor analyses revealed two factors—the Individual/Community domain includes items that measure prosocial attitudes and perceived access to resources in the community; the Family domain includes items that measure prosocial involvement with family and peers. The PFRJR had good model fit, strong internal consistency, and is related to risk in the theoretically appropriate direction. This research highlights the practicability of incorporating a strengths-based measure into traditional risk assessment procedures within an applied setting and contributes to the paucity of risk assessment research that examines strengths-based theoretical models and assessment protocols.

Keywords

risk assessment protective factors juvenile offenders responsivity risk-need-responsivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Hoge

R. D.

(1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

(2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756

Barnoski

(2004). Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment (WSJCA): Manual. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Bartlett

M. S.

(1951). The effect of standardization on a χ² approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 267–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.267

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis.

Borum

Bartel

Forth

(2000). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): Manual. University of South Florida.

Bourgon

Bonta

(2014). Reconsidering the responsivity principle: A way to move forward. Federal Probation, 78(2), 3–10. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/fedpro78&div=17&id=&page=

Buja

Eyuboglu

(1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(4), 509–540. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2704_2

10.

Cerny

B. A.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3

11.

Childs

K. K.

Frick

P. J.

Gottlieb

(2016). Sex differences in the measurement invariance and factors that influence structured judgments of risk using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 14(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014547722

12.

Clark

L. A.

Watson

(1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309

13.

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

J. W.

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

14.

de Vogel

de Vries Robbé

de Ruiter

Bouman

Y. H

. (2011). Assessing protective factors in forensic psychiatric practice: Introducing the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.600230

15.

Fergus

Zimmerman

M. A.

(2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357

16.

Floyd

F. J.

Widaman

K. F.

(1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

17.

Fougere

Daffern

(2011). Resilience in young offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2011.598602

18.

Herrenkohl

T. I.

Lee

Hawkins

J. D.

(2012). Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle Social Development Project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S41–S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.030

19.

Hoge

R. D.

Andrews

D. A.

(2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory™(YLS/CMI™): User’s manual. Multi-Health Services.

20.

Holloway

E. D.

Cruise

K. R.

Morin

S. L.

Kaufman

Steele

R. D.

(2018). Juvenile probation officers’ evaluation of traumatic event exposures and traumatic stress symptoms as responsivity factors in risk assessment and case planning. Law and Human Behavior, 42(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000283

21.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

22.

Hubbard

D. J.

(2007). Getting the most out of correctional treatment: Testing the responsivity principle on male and female offenders. Federal Probation, 71(1), 2–8. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-10883-001

23.

Jason

L. A.

Keys

C. B.

Suarez-Balcazar

Y. E.

Taylor

R. R.

Davis

M. I.

(Eds.) (2004). Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10726-000

24.

Jimerson

S. R.

Sharkey

J. D.

O’Brien

K. M.

Furlong

M. J.

(2004). The Santa Barbara assets and risks Assessment to predict recidivism among male and female juveniles: An investigation of inter-rater reliability and predictive validity. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(4), 353–373. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899812

25.

Jones

N. J.

Brown

S. L.

Robinson

Frey

(2016). Incorporating strengths into quantitative assessments of criminal risk for adult offenders: The Service Planning Instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814547041

26.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573

27.

Lodewijks

H. P.

de Ruiter

Doreleijers

T. A.

(2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending a study in three samples of adolescent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334403

28.

Melton

Cobb

Lindsey

Colgan

R. B.

(2014). Addressing responsivity issues with criminal justice-involved Native Americans. Federal Probation, 78(2), 24–31. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fed_probation_sept_2014.pdf

29.

Miller

H. A.

(2006). A dynamic assessment of offender risk, needs, and strengths in a sample of pre-release general offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.728

30.

Netemeyer

R. G.

Bearden

W. O.

Sharma

(2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. SAGE. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772

31.

Nicholls

T. L.

Viljoen

J. L.

Cruise

K. R.

Desmarais

S. L.

Webster

C. D.

(2010). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START: AV): Abbreviated manual. BC Mental Health and Addiction Services.

32.

Pardini

D. A.

Loeber

Farrington

D. P.

Stouthamer–Loeber

(2012). Identifying direct protective factors for nonviolence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S28–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.024

33.

Partners

(2000). Youth Assessment Screening Inventory (YASI). Orbis Partners.

34.

Rawana

Brownlee

(2010). The Strengths Assessment Inventory: Manual. Centre of Excellence for Children and Adolescents with Special Needs.

35.

Rogers

(2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005575113507

36.

Royer-Gagnier

Skilling

T. A.

Brown

S. L.

Moore

T. E.

Rawana

J. S.

(2016). The Strengths Assessment Inventory–Youth Version: An evaluation of the psychometric properties with male and female justice-involved youth. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000199

37.

Scott

Brown

S. L.

(2018). Risks, strengths, gender, and recidivism among justice-involved youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000343

38.

Shepherd

Luebbers

Dolan

(2013). Gender and ethnicity in juvenile risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812456776

39.

Taxman

F. S.

(2014). Second generation of RNR: The importance of systemic responsivity in expanding core principles of responsivity. Federal Probation, 78(2), 32–40. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fed_probation_sept_2014.pdf

40.

Turner

Fain

(2006). Validation of the risk and resiliency assessment tool for juveniles in the Los Angeles county probation system. Federal Probation, 70(2), 49–57. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/70_2_8_0.pdf

41.

Van der Put

C. E.

Creemers

H. E.

Hoeve

. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without substance use problems in the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for criminal recidivism. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 134, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.012

42.

van Domburgh

Loeber

Bezemer

Stallings

Stouthamer-Loeber

. (2009). Childhood predictors of desistance and level of persistence in offending in early onset offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(7), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9329-x

43.

Walker

Bowen

Brown

(2013). Psychological and criminological factors associated with desistance from violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.021

44.

Wanamaker

K. A.

Jones

N. J.

Brown

S. L.

(2018). Strengths-based assessments for use with forensic populations: A critical review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1451414

45.

Ward

Brown

(2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662744

46.

Winokur-Early

Hand

G. A.

Blankenship

J. L.

(2012). Validity and reliability of the Florida Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) risk and needs assessment instrument: A three-phase evaluation (validation study, factor analysis, inter-rater reliability). Justice Research Center.