The Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions: Version 1.1 (CAPE 1.1) uses structured clinical judgments to diagnose the “with limited prosocial emotions” specifier for Conduct Disorder. This study examined (a) the internal consistency and interrater agreement, and (b) the convergent and divergent validity of the CAPE 1.1 in 72 young males who were incarcerated in two Spanish juvenile detention centers (age range = 14–22 years). The CAPE 1.1 showed good interrater agreement for making the diagnosis of the specifier and adequate internal consistency. The CAPE 1.1 was associated with other measures of callous–unemotional traits, but less consistently associated with other dimensions of psychopathy. Youth who met diagnostic criteria for the specifier scored higher on externalizing problems, but did not differ from other youth who were incarcerated on internalizing problems. These results provide preliminary support for the psychometric properties of the CAPE 1.1 for the clinical assessment of the specifier.
AbadJ.FornsM.AmadorJ. A.MartorellB. (2000). Fiabilidad y validez del youth self report en una muestra de adolescentes [Youth self-report reliability and validity in an adolescent sample]. Psicothema, 12(1), 49–54.
2.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
AndershedH.KerrM.StattinH.LevanderS. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: Initial test of a new assessment tool. In BlaauwE.SheridanL. (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current international perspectives (pp. 131–158). Elsevier.
5.
BarkerC.PristangN.ElliottR. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners. The marketing review (2nd ed.). Wiley.
6.
BlairR. J. R.LeibenluftE.PineD. S. (2014). Conduct disorder and callous–unemotional traits in youth. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(23), 2207–2216. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1315612
7.
CardinaleE. M.MarshA. A. (2020). The reliability and validity of the Inventory of Callous Unemotional Traits: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 27(1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117747392
ColinsO. F. (2016). The clinical usefulness of the DSM-5 specifier for conduct disorder outside of a research context. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000173
11.
ColinsO. F.VermeirenR. R. J. (2013). The usefulness of DSM-IV and DSM-5 conduct disorder subtyping in detained adolescents. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201(9), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a20e94
12.
De los ReyesA.AugensteinT. M.WangM.ThomasS. A.DrabickD. A. G.BurgersD. E.RabinowitzJ. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498
13.
DochertyM.BoxerP.HuesmannL. R.O’BrienM.BushmanB. (2017). Assessing callous-unemotional traits in adolescents: Determining cutoff scores for the Inventory of Callous and Unemotional traits. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22313
14.
DrislaneL. E.PatrickC. J. (2017). Integrating alternative conceptions of psychopathic personality: A latent variable model of triarchic psychopathy constructs. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31(1), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2016_30_240
15.
EzpeletaL.de la OsaN.GraneroR.PeneloE.DomènechJ. M. (2013). Inventory of Callous-Unemotional traits in a community sample of preschoolers. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.734221
16.
ForthA.KossonD.HareR. D. (2003). Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Multi-Health Systems.
FrickP. J.HareR. D. (2001). The antisocial processes screening device: Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.
19.
FrickP. J.RayJ. V. (2015). Evaluating callous-unemotional traits as a personality construct. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12114
20.
FrickP. J.RayJ. V.ThorntonL. C.KahnR. E. (2014a). Annual research review: A developmental psychopathology approach to understanding callous-unemotional traits in children and adolescents with serious conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 55(6), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12152
21.
FrickP. J.RayJ. V.ThorntonL. C.KahnR. E. (2014b). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033076
22.
FrickP. J.StickleT. R.DandreauxD. M.FarrellJ. M.KimonisE. R. (2005). Callous-unemotional traits in predicting the severity and stability of conduct problems and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(4), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-5728-9
23.
HareR. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
HerpersP. C. M.RommelseN. N. J.BonsD. M. A.BuitelaarJ. K.ScheepersF. E. (2012). Callous-unemotional traits as a cross-disorders construct. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(12), 2045–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0513-x
26.
HiltermanE. L. B.NichollsT. L.van NieuwenhuizenC. (2013). Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments. Assessment, 21(3), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113498113
27.
KahnR. E.FrickP. J.YoungstromE.FindlingR. L.YoungstromJ. K. (2012). The effects of including a callous-unemotional specifier for the diagnosis of conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 53, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02463.x
28.
KelseyK. R.RogersR.RobinsonE. V. (2015). Self-report measures of psychopathy: What is their role in forensic assessments?Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9475-5
29.
KimonisE. R.FantiK. A.FrickP. J.MoffittT. E.EssauC.BijttebierP.MarseeM. A. (2015). Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 “With Limited Prosocial Emotions” specifier. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12357
KimonisE. R.FantiK. A.SinghJ. P. (2014). Establishing cut-off scores for the parent-reported Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Archives of Forensic Psychology, 1(1), 27–48.
32.
KimonisE. R.FrickP. J.SkeemJ. L.MarseeM. A.CruiseK.MunozL. C.. . . MorrisA. S. (2008). Assessing callous–unemotional traits in adolescent offenders: Validation of the Inventory of Callous–Unemotional Traits. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.04.002
33.
KnappM. L.HallJ. A. (2010). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
34.
KossonD. S.GaconoC.KlipfelK. M.BodholdtR. (2016). Understanding and assessing psychopathy: Interpersonal aspects and clinical interviewing. In GaconoC. B. (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 252–275). Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
35.
KotlerJ. S.McMahonR. J. (2005). Child psychopathy: Theories, measurement, and relations with the development and persistence of conduct problems. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8(4), 291–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-8810-5
36.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
37.
McMahonR. J.WitkiewitzK.KotlerJ. S., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2010). Predictive validity of callous unemotional traits measured in early adolescence with respect to multiple antisocial outcomes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020796
38.
MolinuevoB.PardoY.GonzálezL.TorrubiaR. (2014). Memories of parenting practices are associated with psychopathy in juvenile male offenders. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(4), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.920901
39.
PardiniD.SteppS.HipwellA.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR. (2012). The clinical utility of the proposed DSM-5 callous-unemotional subtype of conduct disorder in young girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(1), 62–73.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.005
40.
PoythressN.DemboR.WarehamJ.GreenbaumP. E. (2006). Construct validity of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) and the antisocial process screening device (APSD) with justice-involved adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854805282518
41.
RayJ. V.FrickP. J.ThorntonL. C.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.RayJ. V.CauffmanE. (2016). Positive and negative item wording and its influence on the assessment of callous-unemotional traits. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000183
42.
SeijasR.ServeraM.García-BandaG.BarryC. T.BurnsG. L. (2018). Evaluation of a four-item DSM-5 limited prosocial emotions specifier scale within and across settings with Spanish children. Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000496
43.
SharpC.KineS. (2008). The assessment of juvenile psychopathy: Strengths and weaknesses of currently used questionnaire measures. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2008.00483.x
44.
Van DammeL.ColinsO. F.VanderplasschenW. (2016). The limited prosocial emotions specifier for conduct disorder among detained girls: A multi-informant approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(6), 778–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815613104
45.
VanwoerdenS.ReuterT.SharpC. (2016). Exploring the clinical utility of the DSM-5 conduct disorder specifier of “with limited prosocial emotions” in an adolescent inpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 69, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.05.012
46.
VermeirenR.De ClippeleA.Schwab-StoneM.RuchkinV.DeboutteD. (2002). Neuropsychological characteristics of three subgroups of Flemish delinquent adolescents. Neuropsychology, 16, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.16.1.49
47.
World Health Organization. (2018). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Rev.). https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
