Despite the association that the “Limited Prosocial Emotions” (LPE) specifier for Conduct Disorder (CD) has with psychopathy, little is known about whether the LPE specifier aggravates juvenile proceedings. The present study of 294 juror-eligible U.S. citizens examined the effects of the LPE specifier on juror perceptions of juvenile offenders. Relative to undiagnosed offenders, those with a CD or CD+LPE diagnosis were perceived as less amenable to treatment and more dangerous, and received a more restrictive sentence. A CD+LPE diagnosis did not incrementally increase negative perceptions relative to a CD diagnosis. Interestingly, participants recommended less restrictive sentences for youth with a CD+LPE diagnosis relative to those showing symptoms of CD+LPE without a diagnostic label. Controlling for diagnostic status, higher levels of perceived callous-unemotional traits in youth predicted negative perceptions and recommendations for more restrictive sentences. Findings are discussed within the context of the probative value of mental health evidence within legal settings.
AlonsoJ.BuronA.Rojas-FarrerasS.De GraafR.HaroJ.De GirolamoG.. . . VilagutG. (2009). Perceived stigma among individuals with common mental disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 180-186.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
AsscherJ.Van VugtE.StamsG.DekovicM.EichelsheimV.YousfiS. (2011). The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 1134-1143.
4.
AviramR. B.BrodskyB. S.StanleyB. (2006). Borderline personality disorder, stigma, and treatment implications. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 14, 249-256.
5.
BlairR. J. R.LeibenluftE.PineD. S. (2014). Conduct disorder and callous–unemotional traits in youth. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371(23), 2207-2216.
6.
BoccacciniM.MurrieD.ClarkJ.CornellD. (2008). Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: How do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 487-510.
7.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2005). Prosocial Emotions. In BlumeL. E.DurlaufS. N. (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system, III: Current perspectives and future directions (pp. 339-367). London, England: Oxford University Press.
CostanzoM.PetersonJ. (1994). Attorney persuasion in the capital penalty phase: A content analysis of closing arguments. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 125-147.
11.
CoxJ. F.ClarkJ.EdensJ.SmithS.MagyarM. (2013). Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 411-428.
12.
CoxJ. F.DeMatteoD.FosterE. (2010). The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital cases: Mock jurors’ responses to the label of psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 878-891.
13.
CoxJ. F.EdensJ. W.RulsehA.ClarkJ. (2016). Juror perceptions of the interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict sentence severity in a white-collar criminal case. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 721-740.
14.
CruiseK. R.ColwellL. H.LyonsP. M.Jr.BakerM. D. (2003). Prototypical analysis of adolescent psychopathy: Investigating the juvenile justice perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 829-846.
15.
DiamondS. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561-571.
16.
DouglasK. S.NikolovaN. L.KelleyS. E.EdensJ. F. (2015). Psychopathy. In CutlerB. L.ZapfP. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology: Individual and situational influences in criminal and civil contexts (Vol. 1, pp. 257-323). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
EdensJ. F.ColwellL. H.DesforgesD. M.FernandezK. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 603-625.
18.
EdensJ. F.DesforgesD.FernandezK.PalacC. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 393-412.
19.
EdensJ. F.GuyL.FernandezK. (2003). Psychopathic traits predict attitudes toward a juvenile capital murderer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 807-828.
20.
EdensJ. F.MowleE.ClarkJ.MagyarM. (2017). “A psychopath by any other name?”: Juror perceptions of the DSM-5 “Limited Prosocial Emotions” specifier. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 90-109.
21.
FrickP. J. (2004). The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Trait. New Orleans, LA: The University of New Orleans.
22.
FrickP. J.VidingE. (2009). Antisocial behavior from a developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 1111-1131.
23.
HawesD.PriceJ.DaddsM. (2014). Callous-unemotional traits and the treatment of conduct problems in childhood and adolescence: A comprehensive review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 17, 248-267.
24.
Idaho v. Windom, 150 Idaho 873, 253 P. 3d 310 (2011).
25.
Illinois v. Nichols, 964 N. E. 2d 1190 (2012).
26.
JonesS.CauffmanE. (2008). Juvenile psychopathy and judicial decision making: An empirical analysis of an ethical dilemma. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 151-165.
27.
KahnR. E.FrickP. J.YoungstromE.FindlingR. L.YoungstromJ. K. (2012). The effects of including a callous-unemotional specifier for the diagnosis of conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53, 271-282.
28.
KimonisE. R.FantiK. A.FrickP. J.MarseeM. E.MoffittT.EssauC.BijttebierP. (2015). Using self-reported callous-unemotional traits to cross-nationally assess the DSM-5 “With Limited Prosocial Emotions” specifier. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 56, 1249-1261.
29.
KimonisE. R.FrickP. J. (2012). Externalizing disorders. In MadduxJ. E.WinsteadB. A. (Eds.), Psychopathology: Foundations for a contemporary understanding (3rd ed., pp. 443-462). New York: Taylor & Francis.
30.
KimonisE. R.FrickP. J.SkeemJ. L.MarseeM. A.CruiseK.MunozL. C.. . . MorrisA. S. (2008). Assessing callous–unemotional traits in adolescent offenders: Validation of the Inventory of Callous–Unemotional Traits. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 241-252.
31.
LevittM. (2013). Genes, environment and responsibility for violent behavior: “Whatever genes one has it is preferable that you are prevented from going around stabbing people.”New Genetics and Society, 32, 4-17.
32.
MarunaS.LebelT.MitchellN.NaplesM. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 271-281.
33.
MurrieD. C.BoccacciniM.MccoyW.CornellD. (2007). Diagnostic labeling in juvenile court: How do descriptions of psychopathy and conduct disorder influence judges?Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36, 228-241.
34.
MurrieD. C.CornellD. G.McCoyW. K. (2005). Psychopathy, conduct disorder, and stigma: Does diagnostic labeling influence juvenile probation officer recommendations?Law and Human Behavior, 29, 323-342.
35.
PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281-335.
36.
ReavleyN. J.JormA. F. (2011). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 1086-1093.
37.
RockettJ. L.MurrieD. C.BoccacciniM. T. (2007). Diagnostic labeling in juvenile justice settings: Do psychopathy and conduct disorder findings influence clinicians?Psychological Services, 4, 107-122.
38.
RouseS. (2015). A reliability analysis of Mechanical Turk data. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 304-307.
39.
SiltonN.FlannellyK.MilsteinG.VaalerM. (2011). Stigma in America: Has anything changed? Impact of perceptions of mental illness and dangerousness on the desire for social distance: 1996 and 2006. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 361-366.
40.
SmithS. T.EdensJ. F.ClarkJ.RulsehA. (2014). “So, what is a psychopath?” Venireperson perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes about psychopathic personality. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 490-500.
41.
SörmanK. F.KristianssonM. T.EdensJ. W.SmithS.ClarkJ.SvenssonO. (2016). Boldness and its relation to psychopathic personality: Prototypicality analyses among forensic mental health, criminal justice, and layperson raters. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 337-349.
42.
South Carolina v. Stanko, 402 S. C. 252, 741 S. E. 2d 708 (2013).
43.
Stanley v. Litscher, 213 F.3d 340 (7th Cir. 2000).
44.
SundbyS. (1998). The capital jury and absolution: The intersection of trial strategy, remorse, and the death penalty. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1557-1598.
45.
TeplinL. A.AbramK. M.McClellandG. K.DulcanM.MericleA. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133-1143.
46.
ThomasK. A.CliffordS. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184-197.
47.
VidalS.SkeemJ. (2007). Effect of psychopathy, abuse, and ethnicity on juvenile probation officers’ decision-making and supervision strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 479-498.
48.
ViljoenJ.MacDougallE.GagnonN.DouglasK. (2010). Psychopathy evidence in legal proceedings involving adolescent offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 254-283.
49.
VincentG. M.KimonisE. R.ClarkA. (2016). Juvenile psychopathy: Appropriate and inappropriate uses in legal proceedings. In HeilburnK.DeMatteoK. D.GoldsteinN. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 197-332). Washington, DC: America Psychological Association.
50.
WilsonN.TamateaA. (2013). Challenging the “urban myth” of psychopathy untreatability: The High-Risk Personality Programme. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 493-510.
51.
YapM. B.ReavleyN. J.JormA. F. (2012). Associations between awareness of beyondblue and mental health literacy in Australian youth: Results from a national survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 541-552.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
