Prison Officer Self-Legitimacy and Support for Rehabilitation in Ghana

Abstract

Legitimacy remains a principal issue for prison researchers and managers. However, prison legitimacy literature tends to focus on views held by individuals in custody. Research on prison officer Self-Legitimacy—that is, the prison officers’ belief that the authority vested in them is morally right—remains scanty. Drawing on data from a survey of 1,062 prison officers in Ghana, this study examined both the correlates of prison officer Self-Legitimacy and the links between Self-Legitimacy and Support for Rehabilitation of individuals in custody. The results of multivariate analyses showed that having good Relations with Colleagues and being treated fairly by supervisors enhanced prison officers’ Self-Legitimacy. In turn, Self-Legitimacy was found to increase officers’ Support for Rehabilitation. Finally, perceived Fair Treatment by Supervisors and positive Relations with Individuals in Custody were associated with increased Support for Rehabilitation. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

self-legitimacy legitimacy rehabilitation recognition Ghana prisons

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akoensi

T. D.

(2014a). A tougher beat? The work, stress and well-being of prison officers in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Akoensi

T. D.

(2014b). Governance through power sharing in Ghanaian prisons: A symbiotic relationship between officers and inmates. Prison Service Journal, 212, 33-39.

Akoensi

T. D.

(2016). Perceptions of self-legitimacy and audience legitimacy among prison officers in Ghana. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 40, 245-261. doi:10.1080/01924036.2016.1165712

Akoensi

T. D.

(2017). Ghana, corrections in. In Kerley

(Ed.), The encyclopedia of corrections (pp. 344-352). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118845387.wbeoc118

Archer

(2003). Structure, agency and internal conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Barbalet

(2001). Emotions, social theory and social structure: A macrosociological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Barker

(2001). Legitimating identities: The self-presentations of rulers and subjects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Dirkzwager

A. J. E.

Molleman

Van Der Laan

P. H.

Nieuwbeerta

(2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 337-358. doi:10.1177/0306624X13512767

Bendix

(1963). Concepts and generalizations in comparative sociological studies. American Sociological Review, 28, 532-539. doi:10.2307/2090069

10.

Boateng

F. D.

Hsieh

M. L.

(2019a). Explaining job satisfaction and commitment among prison officers: The role of organizational justice. The Prison Journal, 99, 172-193. doi:10.1177/0032885519825491

11.

Boateng

F. D.

Hsieh

M. L.

(2019b). Misconduct within the “four walls”: Does organizational justice matter in explaining prison officers’ misconduct and job stress? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63, 289-308. doi:10.1177/0306624X1878094

12.

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102, 119-170.

13.

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2013). “Voice within”: Power-holders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy. In Tankebe

Liebling

(Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 60-82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

14.

Boulding

K. E.

(1967). The legitimacy of economics. Economic Inquiry, 5, 299-307.

15.

Bradford

Quinton

(2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. The British Journal of Criminology, 54, 1023-1046.

16.

Brunton-Smith

McCarthy

D. J.

(2017). The effects of prisoner attachment to family on re-entry outcomes: A longitudinal assessment. The British Journal of Criminology, 57, 463-482.

17.

Chan

(1996). Changing police culture. The British Journal of Criminology, 36, 109-134. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511518195

18.

Crewe

(2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation, and social life in an English prison. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

19.

Cullen

Link

Wolfe

Frank

(1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Quarterly, 2, 505-533. doi:10.1080/07418828500088711

20.

Cullen

Lutze

Link

Wolfe

(1989). The correctional orientation of prison guards: Do officers support rehabilitation? Federal Probation, 53, 33-42.

21.

Farkas

(1999). Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a “get tough” era. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 495-506.

22.

Ghana Prisons Service. (2016). Annual report. Accra, Ghana: Author.

23.

Gilbert

(1997). The illusion of structure: A critique of the classical model of organization and the discretionary power of correctional officers. Criminal Justice Review, 22, 49-64.

24.

Hacin

Fields

Meško

(2018). The self-legitimacy of prison staff in Slovenia. European Journal of Criminology, 16, 41-59. doi:10.1177/1477370818764831

25.

Jackson

J. E.

Ammen

(1996). Race and correctional officers’ punitive attitudes toward treatment programs for inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 153-166.

26.

Jonathan-Zamir

Harpaz

(2018). Predicting support for procedurally just treatment: The case of the Israel national police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 840-862.

27.

Kauffmann

(1988). Prison officers and their world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Kerce

E. W.

Magnusson

Rudolph

(1994). The attitudes of Navy corrections staff members: What they think about their confinees and their jobs. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

29.

Kronman

(1983). Max Weber. London, England: Edward Arnold.

30.

Liebling

(2011). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 484-499.

31.

Liebling

Arnold

Straub

(2011). An exploration of staff—Prisoner relationships at HMP Whitemoor: 12 years on (Revised final report). Cambridge, UK: Institute of Criminology.

32.

Liebling

Price

Shefer

(2011). The prison officer (2nd ed.). Cullompton, UK: Willan.

33.

Meško

Hacin

Tankebe

Fields

(2017). Self-legitimacy, organizational commitment and commitment to fair treatment of prisoners: An empirical study of prison officers in Slovenia. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 25, 11-30.

34.

Molleman

Leeuw

F. L.

(2012). The influence of prison staff on inmate conditions: A multilevel approach to staff and inmate surveys. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 18, 217-233.

35.

Muir

(1977). Police: Streetcorner politicians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

36.

Nelken

(2009). Comparative criminal justice: Beyond ethnocentrism and relativism. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 291-311.

37.

Nix

Wolfe

S. E.

(2016). The impact of negative publicity on police self-legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 34, 84-108.

38.

Reisig

M. D.

Meško

(2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 41-59.

39.

Schinkel

(2014). Being imprisoned: Punishment, adaptation and desistance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

40.

Sparks

(1994). Can prisons be legitimate? Penal politics, privatization, and the timeliness of an old Idea. The British Journal of Criminology, 34, 14-28.

41.

Sparks

Bottoms

Hay

(1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

42.

Sternberger

(1968). Legitimacy. In Sills

D. L.

(Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. IX, pp. 244-248). New York, NY: Free Press.

43.

Symkovych

(2018). Compromised power and negotiated order in a Ukrainian prison. The British Journal of Criminology, 58, 200-217.

44.

Tankebe

(2010). Identifying the correlates of police organizational commitment in Ghana. Police Quarterly, 13, 73-91.

45.

Tankebe

(2014). Rightful authority: Exploring the structure of police self-legitimacy. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2499717

46.

Tankebe

(2019). In their own eyes: An empirical examination of police self-legitimacy. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43, 99-116.

47.

Tankebe

Meško

(2015). Police self-legitimacy, use of force, and pro-organizational behavior in Slovenia. In Meško

Tankebe

(Eds.), Trust and legitimacy in criminal justice: European perspectives (pp. 261-277). New York, NY: Springer.

48.

Tewksbury

Mustaine

E. E.

(2008). Correctional orientations of prison staff. The Prison Journal, 88, 207-233.

49.

Trinkner

Kerrison

E. M.

Goff

P. A.

(2019). The force of fear: Police stereotype threat, self-legitimacy, and support for excessive force. Law and Human Behavior, 43, 421-435.

50.

Tyler

Callahan

Frost

(2007). Armed, and dangerous (?): Motivating rule adherence among agents of social control. Law & Society Review, 41, 457-492.

51.

Wolfe

S. E.

Nix

(2016). The alleged Ferguson effect and police willingness to engage in community partnership. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 1-10.

52.

Wrong

D. H.

(1995). Power: Its forms, bases and uses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.