Does Sentence Type and Length Matter? Interactions of Age,Race,Ethnicity,and Gender on Jail and Prison Sentences

Abstract

The current work explores the direct and interaction effects of age, race, ethnicity, and gender disparity on sentence lengths, considering differences between jail and prison sanctions. The liberation hypothesis suggests that increased judicial discretion in cases involving less serious crimes results in greater extralegal disparity; however, this prediction may not be consistent with how sentencing guidelines structure discretion. Drawing on 7 years of data (2004-2010) from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, we employ quantile regression models to account for the structure of sentencing guidelines, while examining variation in jail and prison sentence length outcomes. Results indicate that punishment severity varies across age, race, ethnicity, and gender subgroups, but not in ways that offer support for the liberation hypothesis or fit with opportunities to exercise discretion under sentencing guidelines. Substantive, methodological, and policy implications are discussed.

Keywords

sentencing guidelines liberation hypothesis extralegal disparity quantile regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266. doi:10.2307/800532

Britt

C. L.

(2009). Modeling the distribution of sentence length decisions under a guidelines system: An application of quantile regression models. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 341-370. doi:10.1007/s10940-009-9066-x

Cardozo

(1921). The nature of the judicial process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Cassidy

Rydberg

(2018). Analyzing variation in prior record penalties across conviction offenses. Crime & Delinquency, 64, 831-855. doi:10.1177/0011128717693215

Chiricos

Crawford

(1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In Hawkins

(Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime (pp. 281-309). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Clair

Winter

A. S.

(2016). How judges think about racial disparities: Situational decision-making in the criminal justice system. Criminology, 54, 332-359.

Crawford

Chiricos

Kleck

(1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481-511.

Freeborn

B. A.

Hartmann

M. E.

(2010, September). Racial and ethnic disparities in federal sentencing: A quantile regression approach. 5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1635446

Freiburger

T. L.

Hilinski

C. M.

(2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 59-86. doi:10.1177/0011128708330178

10.

Greenwald

A. G.

Krieger

L. H.

(2006). Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. California Law Review, 94, 945-968.

11.

Hagemann

(2017). Cluster-Robust Bootstrap inference in quantile regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 446-456. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1148610

12.

Harrington

M. P.

(2008). Revisiting the total incarceration variable: Should researchers separate jail from prison sentences in sentencing research? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 462-478. doi:10.1177/1043986208321843

13.

Harrington

M. P.

Spohn

(2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36-63.

14.

Hauser

Peck

J. H.

(2017). The intersection of crime seriousness, discretion, and race: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 34, 166-192. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1121284

15.

Hester

Hartman

T. K.

(2017). Conditional race disparities in criminal sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis from a non-guidelines state. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 77-100. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z

16.

Holleran

Spohn

(2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211-240. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00518.x

17.

Honaker

King

Blackwell

(2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1-47. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i07/

18.

Irwin

J. F.

Real

D. L.

(2010). Unconscious influences on judicial decision-making: The illusion of objectivity. McGeorge Law Review, 42, 1-18.

19.

Johnson

B. D.

(2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449-489. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00994.x

20.

Johnson

B. D.

(2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44, 259-298. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00049.x

21.

Johnson

B. D.

(2014). Judges on trial: A reexamination of judicial race and gender effects across modes of conviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 159-184. doi:10.1177/0887403412463933

22.

Jordan

K. L.

Freiburger

T. L.

(2015). The effect of race/ethnicity on sentencing: Examining sentence type, jail length, and prison length. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13, 179-196. doi:10.1080/15377938.2014.984045

23.

Kalven

Jr. Zeisel

(1966). The American jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

24.

Kang

(2012). Communications law: Bits of bias. In Levinson

J. D.

Smith

R. J.

(Eds.), Implicit racial bias across the law (pp. 132-145). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Koenker

(2005). Quantile regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Koenker

(2016). quantreg: Quantile regression (R Package Version 5.26). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg

27.

Koenker

Basset

(1982). Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica, 50, 43-61. doi:10.2307/1912528

28.

Koenker

Xiao

(2002). Inference on the quantile regression process. Econometrica, 70, 1583-1612. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00342

29.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

30.

Leiber

M. J.

Blowers

A. N.

(2003). Race and misdemeanor sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 464-485. doi:10.1177/0887403403254492

31.

Levinson

J. D.

(2007). Forgotten racial equality: Implicit bias, decisionmaking, and misremembering. Duke Law Journal, 57, 345-411.

32.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

33.

Rachlinski

J. J.

Johnson

Wistrich

A. J.

Guthrie

(2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges? Notre Dame Law Review, 84, 1195-1246.

34.

Reitz

(1998). Sentencing. In Tonry

(Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 543-546). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

35.

Rodriguez

S. F.

Curry

T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318-339. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x

36.

Rydberg

Cassidy

Socia

K. M.

(2018). Punishing the wicked: Examining the correlates of sentence severity for convicted sex offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 943-970. doi:10.1007/s10940-017-9360-y

37.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

38.

Spohn

Cederblom

(1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305-326. doi:10.1080/07418829100091071

39.

Spohn

DeLone

(2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3-37.

40.

Spohn

C. C.

(2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 427-501.

41.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60, 810-833. doi:10.1177/0731121416679371

42.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

43.

Tonry

(1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

44.

Ulmer

J. T.

Johnson

B. D.

(2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-175. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00516.x

45.

Ulmer

J. T.

Light

M. T.

Kramer

(2011). The “liberation” of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: Is there increased disparity and divergence between courts? Justice Quarterly, 28, 799-837.

46.

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220. (2005).

47.

Wang

Mears

D. P.

Spohn

Dario

(2013). Assessing the differential effects of race and ethnicity on sentence outcomes under different sentencing systems. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 87-114. doi:10.1177/0011128709352234

48.

Warren

Chiricos

Bales

(2012). The imprisonment penalty for young black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 56-80. doi:10.1177/0022427810397945