Stalking (also known as “criminal harassment” in Canada) is broadly defined as repeated contact with another individual that elicits fear. By manipulating the details of an actual stalking case, the present study examined the role of actor sex (man–woman [M-W], woman–man [W-M]) on perceptions of stalking in a sample of local police officers. Consistent with previous research, officers who read the M-W case anticipated more physical, emotional, psychological, and economic harm, as well as greater likelihood of a prison sentence by judges, than officers who read the W-M case. Actor sex did not influence officers’ perceptions of seriousness, likelihood of a jury conviction, or identification of criminal harassment. The findings may be used to develop intervention programs aimed at educating law enforcement, social support workers, and community agencies to ensure appropriate protection and treatment of individuals stalked by former partners.
BrownG. A. (2004). Gender as a factor in the response of the law-enforcement system to violence against partners. Sexuality and Culture, 8(3-4), 3-139.
5.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CassA. I. (2008). Individual perceptions of stalking: An examination of the influence of gender and the victim/offender relationship (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Information and Learning. (Order No. AAI3277835)
7.
CassA. I.MallicoatS. L. (2015). College student perceptions of victim action: Will targets of stalking report to police?American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 250-269. doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9252-8
8.
CassA. I.RosayA. B. (2012). College student perceptions of criminal justice system responses to stalking. Sex Roles, 66, 392-404. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9934-3
9.
CheungM.LeungP.TsuiV. (2009). Asian male domestic violence victims: Services exclusive for men. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 447-462. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9240-9
10.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
ConnellR. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12.
CormierN. S.WoodworthM. T. (2008). Do you see what I see? The influence of gender stereotypes on student and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) perceptions of violent same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 17, 475-505. doi:10.1080/10926770802463446
13.
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c.46, s.231(6).
14.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170-180.
16.
DavisK. E.AceA.AndraM. (2000). Stalking perpetrators and psychological maltreatment of partners: Anger-jealousy, attachment insecurity, need for control, and break-up context. Violence and Victims, 15, 407-425.
17.
DavisK. E.CokerA. L.SandersonM. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women. Violence and Victims, 17, 429-443. doi:10.1891/vivi.17.4.429.33682
18.
DunlapE. E.HodellE. C.GoldingJ. M.WasarhaleyN. E. (2012). Mock jurors’ perception of stalking: The impact of gender and expressed fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405-417. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9970-z
19.
DuttonL. B.SpitzbergB. H. (2007). Stalking—Its nature and dynamics. In Kendall-TackettK. A.GiacomoniS. M. (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (pp. 4.1-4.20). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
20.
FinnM. A.StalansL. J. (1995). Police referrals to shelters and mental health treatment: Examining their decisions in domestic assault cases. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 467-480. doi:10.1177/0011128795041004006
21.
FinnM. A.StalansL. J. (1997). The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 157-176. doi:10.1177/0093854897024002002
22.
FinneganH. A.FritzP. A. (2012). Differential effects of gender on perceptions of stalking and harassment behavior. Violence and Victims, 27, 895-910. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.895
23.
GavinJ.ScottA. J. (2016). The influence of the sex of and prior relationship between the perpetrator and victim on perceptions of stalking: A qualitative analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 716-732. doi:10.1080/13218719.2016.1142933
24.
GilesJ. W.HeymanG. D. (2005). Young children’s beliefs about the relationship between gender and aggressive behavior. Child Development, 76, 107-121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00833.x
25.
GoffmanE. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301-331.
26.
JohnsonM. C.KercherG. A. (2009). Identifying predictors of negative psychological reactions to stalking victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 866-882. doi:10.1177/0886260508317195
27.
KinkadeP.BurnsR.FuentesA. I. (2005). Criminalizing attractions: Perceptions of stalking and the stalker. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0011128703262462
28.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2012). Gender and stalking: Current intersections and future directions. Sex Roles, 66, 418-426. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0093-3
29.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.PalareaR. E.CohenJ.RohlingM. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: Unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. Violence and Victims, 15, 73-90.
30.
LoganT. K.ShannonL.ColeJ. (2007). Stalking victimization in the context of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 22, 669-683. doi:10.1891/088667007782793147
31.
LyonD. R. (2006). An examination of police investigational files for criminal harassment (stalking): Implications for case management (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Information and Learning. (Order No. AAINR23873)
32.
McEwanT. E.MullenP. E.MacKenzieR. D.OgloffJ. R. P. (2009). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1469-1478. doi:10.1017/S0033291708004996
33.
MullerH. J.DesmaraisS. L.HamelJ. M. (2009). Do judicial responses to restraining order requests discriminate against male victims of domestic violence?Journal of Family Violence, 24, 625-637. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9261-4
34.
National Criminal Justice Association. (1993, October). Project to develop a model anti-stalking code for states. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
35.
PalareaR. E.ZonaM. A.LaneJ. C.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: Threats, violence and associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 269-283. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10990798(199907/09)17:3<269::AID-BSL346>3.0.CO;2-6
36.
PhillipsL.QuirkR.RosenfeldB.O’ConnorM. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73-96. doi:10.1177/0093854803259251
37.
ScottA. J.NixonK.SheridanL. (2013). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking: A comparison of laypersons, nonspecialist police officers, and specialist police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 1434-1448. doi:10.1177/0093854813494183
38.
ScottA. J.RajakarunaN.SheridanL.GavinJ. (2015). International perceptions of relational stalking: The influence of prior relationship, perpetrator sex, target sex, and participant sex. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 3308-3323. doi:10.1177/0886260514555012
39.
SheridanL.GillettR.DaviesG. M.BlaauwE.PatelD. (2003). “There’s no smoke without fire”: Are male ex-partners perceived as more “entitled” to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers?British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87-98. doi:10.1348/000712603762842129
40.
SheridanL.ScottA. J. (2010). Perceptions of harm: Verbal versus physical abuse in stalking scenarios. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 400-416. doi:10.1177/0093854809359743
41.
SheridanL.ScottA. J.NixonK. (2014). Police officer perceptions of harassment in England and Scotland. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21, 1-14. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12049
42.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R.CiceraroL. D. L. (2010). Sex differences in stalking and obsessive relational intrusion: Two meta-analyses. Partner Abuse, 1, 259-285. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.259
43.
StalansL. J.FinnM. A. (1995). How novice and experienced officers interpret wife assaults: Normative and efficiency frames. Law & Society Review, 29, 287-321. doi:10.2307/3054013
44.
Statistics Canada. (2005). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile (Catalogue No. 85-224-XIE). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, National Clearinghouse on Family Violence, Family Violence Prevention Unit, Public Health Agency of Canada.
45.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ Report No. 169592). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
TsuiV.CheungM.LeungP. (2010). Help-seeking among male victims of partner abuse: Men’s hard times. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 769-780. doi:10.1002/jcop.20394
48.
WellerM.HopeL.SheridanL. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: The role of prior victim-offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 320-339. doi:10.1177/0886260512454718
