The Effects of Probation or Parole Agent Relationship Style and Women Offenders’ Criminogenic Needs on Offenders’ Responses to Supervision Interactions

Abstract

Although prior research revealed that in noncorrectional and correctional settings, staff relationship style affects client outcomes, there has been little study of this effect for women offenders. The present study investigated effects of two dimensions of relationship style (probation or parole agent–reported supportiveness and punitiveness) on female clients’ reports of responding to interactions with their agents with anxiety, reactance, and a sense of self-efficacy to avoid a criminal lifestyle. Results of a longitudinal study of 330 women on probation or parole revealed that agent supportiveness elicited lower anxiety and reactance and higher crime-avoidance self-efficacy. Agent punitiveness elicited greater anxiety and crime-avoidance self-efficacy. Moderation effect analysis showed that punitive style was most related to anxiety and reactance for women at lowest risk for reoffending. In contrast, supportiveness was most related to positive outcomes for the highest risk women. The research findings suggest areas for future theory development and approaches to effective correctional practice.

Keywords

probation parole dual-role relationship women moderation analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

S. J.

Hilsenroth

M. J.

(2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1-33.

Adamson

S. J.

Sellman

J. D.

Frampton

C. M. A.

(2009). Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: A systematic review. Substance Abuse Treatment, 36, 75-86.

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Andrews

D. A.

(2011). Reintroducing rehabilitation to corrections. In Dvoskin

J. A.

Skeem

J. L.

Novaco

R. W.

Douglas

K. L.

(Eds.), Applying social science to reduce violent offending (pp. 127-156). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.

Andrews

D. A.

Kiessling

(1980). Program structure and effective correctional practice: A summary of CaVic research. In Ross

Gendreau

(Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 439-463). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Butterworths.

Andrews

D. A.

Zinger

Hoge

R. D.

Bonta

Gendreau

Cullen

F. T.

(1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bloom

Owen

Covington

S. S.

Raeder

M. S.

(2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

10.

Bordin

E. S.

(1979). The generalizability of the psycho-analytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252-260.

11.

Boulet

Boss

M. W.

(1991). Reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 433-437.

12.

Brehm

J. W.

(1966). A theory of psychological reactance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

13.

Brehm

J. W.

Brehm

S. S.

(1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

14.

Bui

Morash

(2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 1-22.

15.

Carroll

K. M.

(2005). Matching and differential therapies: Providing substance abusers with appropriate treatment. In Frances

R. J.

Miller

S. I.

Mack

A. H.

(Eds.), Clinical textbook of addictive disorders (pp. 637-662). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

16.

Carson

E. A.

Sabol

W. J.

(2012). Prisoners in 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

17.

Castonguay

L. G.

Beutler

L. E.

(2005). Principles of therapeutic change that work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

18.

Cullen

Eck

Lowenkamp

(2002). Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for effective probation and parole supervision. Federal Probation, 66(2), 28-37.

19.

Davis

T. A.

Ancis

(2012). Look to the relationship: A review of African American women substance users’ poor treatment retention and working alliance development. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 662-672.

20.

Derogitas

L. R.

Melisarotos

(1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595-605.

21.

DeRubeis

R. J.

Gelfand

L. A.

German

R. E.

Fournier

J. C.

Forand

N. R.

(2014). Understanding processes of change: How some patients reveal more than others—and some groups of therapists less—about what matters in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 419-428.

22.

Dowden

Andrews

D. A.

(1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytical review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 438-452.

23.

Fuertes

J. N.

Mislowack

Bennett

Paul

Gilbert

T. C.

Fontan

Boylan

L. S.

(2007). The physician–patient working alliance. Patient Education & Counseling, 66, 29-36.

24.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.

25.

George

Mallery

(2005). SPSS for Windows step by step. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

26.

Glaze

L. E.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2009). Probation and parole in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

27.

Glaze

L. E.

Parks

(2012). Correctional populations in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

28.

Gossop

Marsden

Stewart

(2006). Remission of psychiatric symptoms among drug misusers after drug dependence treatment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 826-832.

29.

Green

T. C.

Johnson

Harrington

Pouget

E. R.

Rhodes

A. G.

Taxman

F. S.

. . .Friedmann

P. D.

(2013). Parole officer-parolee relationships and HIV risk behaviors during community supervision. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 2667-2675.

30.

Greenfeld

L. A.

Snell

T. L.

(1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

31.

Hong

Faedda

(1996). Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 173-182.

32.

Horvath

A. O.

Del Re

A. C.

Fluckinger

Symonds

(2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9-16.

33.

Ilgen

M. A.

McKellar

Moos

Finney

J. W.

(2006). Therapeutic alliance and the relationship between motivation and treatment outcomes in patients with alcohol use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 157-162.

34.

Ilgen

M. A.

Tiet

Finney

Moos

R. H.

(2006). Self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance, and alcohol-use disorder treatment outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 465-472.

35.

James

D. J.

Glaze

L. E.

(2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

36.

Johnson

M. O.

Chesney

M. A.

Goldstein

R. B.

Remien

R. H.

Catz

Gore-Felton

, . . . The NIMH Healthy Living Project Team (2006). Positive provider interactions, adherence self-efficacy, and adherence to antiretroviral medications among HIV-infected adults: A mediation model. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 20, 258-268.

37.

Kadden

R. M.

Litt

M. D.

(2011). The role of self-efficacy in the treatment of substance use disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 1120-1126.

38.

Kennealy

P. J.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

S. M.

Louden

J. E.

(2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 496-505.

39.

Klockars

(1972). A theory of probation supervision. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, & Police Science, 63, 550-557.

40.

Lambert

Bergin

A. E.

(1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In Bergin

A. E.

Garfield

S. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 143-189). New York, NY: John Wiley.

41.

Langan

Pelissier

(2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 291-301.

42.

Leverentz

A. M.

(2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 43, 459-488.

43.

Lind

E. A.

Van den Bos

(2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In Straw

B. M.

Kramer

R. M.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

44.

Lorenzo-Luaces

DeRubeis

R. J.

Webb

C. A.

(2014). Client characteristics as moderators of the relation between the therapeutic alliance and outcome in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 368-373.

45.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Holsinger

A. M.

Robinson

C. R.

Cullen

F. T.

(2012). When a person isn’t a data point: Making evidence-based practice work. Federal Probation, 76(3), 11-21.

46.

Luong

Wormith

J. S.

(2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1177-1199.

47.

Maidment

M. R.

(2006). Doing time on the outside. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

48.

Mallik-Kane

Visher

C. A.

(2008). Health and prisoner reentry: How physical, mental, and substance abuse conditions shape the process of reintegration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

49.

Marsh

J. C.

Angell

Andrews

C. M.

Curry

(2012). Client-provider relationship and treatment outcome: A systematic review of substance abuse, child welfare, and mental health services research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3, 233-267.

50.

Marshall

W. L.

Serran

G. A.

(2004). The role of the therapist in offender treatment. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 309-320.

51.

Maruschak

L. M.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2013). Probation and parole in the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

52.

Miller

W. R.

Rollnick

(1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

53.

Minton

T. D.

(2012). Jail inmates at midyear 2011-statistical tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

54.

Morash

(2010). Women on probation and parole: A feminist critique of community programs and services. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

55.

Norcross

J. C.

(2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

56.

O’Brien

(2001). “Just like baking a cake”: Women describe the necessary ingredients for successful reentry after incarceration. Families in Society, 82, 287-295.

57.

Owen

Bloom

(1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 165-185.

58.

Pelissier

B. M.

Camp

S. D.

Gaes

G. G.

Saylor

W. G.

Rhodes

(2003). Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 149-160.

59.

Phillips

J. M.

(2002). Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice perceptions in hierarchical decision-making teams. Small Group Research, 33, 32-64.

60.

Piper

W. E.

Ogrodniczuk

J. S.

Joyce

A. S.

(2004). Quality of object relations as a moderator of the relationship between pattern of alliance and outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 345-356.

61.

Richie

B. E.

(2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 368-389.

62.

Rumgay

(2004). Living with paradox: Community supervision of women offenders. In McIvor

(Ed.), Women who offend (pp. 99-125). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.

63.

Salisbury

E. J.

Van Voorhis

(2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 541-566.

64.

Salisbury

E. J.

Van Voorhis

Spiropoulis

(2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 550-585.

65.

Schnur

J. B.

Montgomery

G. H.

(2010). A systematic review of therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, empathy, and goal consensus/collaboration in psychotherapeutic interventions in cancer: Uncommon factors? Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 238-247.

66.

Schram

P. J.

Koons-Witt

B. A.

Williams

F. P.

McShane

M. J.

(2006). Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 450-471.

67.

Schrank

Bird

Rudnick

Slade

(2012). Determinants, self-management strategies and interventions for hope in people with mental disorders: Systematic search and narrative review. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 554-564.

68.

Sherer

Maddux

J. E.

Mercadante

Prentice-Dunn

Jacobs

Rogers

R. W.

(1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.

69.

Skeem

J. L.

Encandela

Eno Louden

(2003). Perspectives on probation and mandated mental health treatment in specialized and traditional probation departments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 429-458.

70.

Skeem

J. L.

Eno Louden

Manchak

Vidal

Haddad

(2009). Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 122-135.

71.

Skeem

J. L.

Eno Louden

Polaschek

D. L.

Camp

(2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19, 397-410.

72.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

S. M.

Johnson

Gillig

(2008, May). Comparing specialty and traditional supervision for probationers with mental illness. Paper presented at the American Psychology and Law Society, Jacksonville, FL. Retrieved from https://webfiles.uci.edu:443/skeem/Downloads.html

73.

Skeem

J. L.

Petrila

(2004). Problem-solving supervision: Specialty probation for individuals with mental illness. Court Review, 40, 8-15.

74.

Steadman

Osher

F. C.

Robbins

P. C.

Case

Samuels

(2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60, 761-765.

75.

Tate

S. R.

McQuaid

J. R.

Cummins

Shriver

Krenek

Brown

S. A.

(2008). Comorbidity of substance dependence and depression: Role of life stress and self-efficacy in sustaining abstinence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 47-57.

76.

Taxman

F. S.

(2002). Supervision: Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66(2), 14-27.

77.

Taxman

F. S.

Ainsworth

(2009). Correctional milieu: The key to quality outcomes. Victims & Offenders, 4, 334-340.

78.

Thomas

Bracken

Timimi

(2012). The anomalies of evidence-based medicine in psychiatry: Time to rethink the basis of mental health practice. Mental Health Review Journal, 17, 152-162.

79.

Trotter

(2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

80.

Urbanoski

K. A.

Kelly

J. F.

Hoeppner

B. B.

Slaymaker

(2012). The role of therapeutic alliance in substance use disorder treatment for young adults. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43, 344-351.

81.

Van Voorhis

(2012). On behalf of women offenders: Women’s place in the science of evidence-based practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 111-145.

82.

Van Voorhis

Bauman

Brushett

(2013). Revalidation of the Women’s Risk Needs Assessment: Probation results. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.

83.

Van Voorhis

Wright

E. M.

Salisbury

Bauman

(2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261-288.

84.

Watson

Pennebaker

J. W.

Folger

(1987). Beyond negative affectivity: Measuring stress and satisfaction in the workplace. In Ivancevich

J. M.

Ganster

D. C.

(Eds.), Job stress: From theory to suggestion (pp. 141-157). New York, NY: Haworth Press

85.

Wright

E. M.

Van Voorhis

Bauman

Salisbury

(2008). Gender-responsive risk/needs assessment: Final report. Cincinnati, OH: Criminal Justice Research Center, University of Cincinnati.