Previous research has documented several correlates of criminal victimization, but less is known about the factors related to victim injury during criminal events. Using environmental criminology to understand offender decision making during the criminal event, victim injury is explored with data from the National Incident Based Reporting System. Incident-level logistic and multinomial regression analyses were conducted to estimate the environmental and situational correlates of victim injury risk and severity in nonfatal violent events. Findings indicate that environmental and situational factors influence the likelihood and severity of victim injury, suggesting the utility of an environmental criminological approach for understanding not just the decision to offend but also offender behavior during criminal events.
Akiyama, Y., & Nolan, J. ( 1999). Methods for understanding and analyzing NIBRS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 225-238.
2.
Bachman, R., & Carmody, D.C. ( 1994). Fighting fire with fire: The effects of victim resistance in intimate versus stranger perpetrated assaults against females . Journal of Family Violence, 9, 317-331.
3.
Bachman, R., Lachs, M., & Meloy, M. ( 2004). Reducing injury through self-protection by elderly victims of violence: The interaction effects of gender of victim and the victim/offender relationship. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 16, 1-24.
4.
Brantingham, P.J., & Brantingham, P.L. (1993). Nodes, paths, and edges: Consideration on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.
5.
Brantingham, P.J., & Brantingham, P.L. (1995). Environmental criminology and crime prevention. In P.-O. H. Wikstrom , R. V. Clarke, & J. McCord (Eds.), Integrating crime prevention strategies: Propensity and opportunity (pp. 207-239). Stockholm, Sweden: National Council for Crime Prevention Sweden.
6.
Brantingham, P.L., & Brantingham, P.J. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 27-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Brantingham, P.L., & Brantingham, P.J. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5, pp. 259-294). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
8.
Brantingham, P.L., & Brantingham, P.J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5-26.
9.
Brecklin, L.R., & Ullman, S.E. ( 2001). The role of offender alcohol use in rape attacks: An analysis of National Crime Victimization Survey Data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 3-21.
10.
Clarke, R.V., & Cornish, D.B. ( 1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.
11.
Clogg, C., & Shihadeh, E. ( 1994). Statistical models for ordinal variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 88-100.
13.
Cook, P.J. ( 1986). The relationship between victim resistance and injury in noncommercial robbery. Journal of Legal Studies , 15, 405-416.
14.
Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. ( 2003). Opportunities, precipitators, and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (pp. 41-96). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
15.
Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. ( 2008). The rational choice perspective. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 21-47). Collompton, UK: Willan.
16.
D’Alessio, S.J., & Stolzenberg, L. (2009). Racial animosity and interracial crime . Criminology, 45, 269-296.
17.
Eck, J.E. ( 1994). Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Maryland, College Park.
18.
Eck, J.E., Clarke, R.V., & Guerette, R.T. (2007). Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. In G. Farrell, K. Bowers, K. D. Johnson, & M. Townsley (Eds.), Imagination for crime prevention (pp. 225-264). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
19.
Felson, M. ( 1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In D. B. Cornish & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending (pp. 119-28). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag .
20.
Felson, M. ( 1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 53-66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
21.
Finkelhor, D., & Asdigian, N.L. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyle/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11, 3-19.
22.
Hindelang, M.J., Gottfredson, M.R., & Garofalo, J. ( 1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23.
Kleck, G., & DeLone, M.A. (1993). Victim resistance and offender weapon effects in robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 9, 55-81.
24.
Lauritsen, J.L., & Quinet, K.F.D. (1995). Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 11, 143-166.
25.
Martin, S.E., & Bachman, R. ( 1998). The contribution of alcohol to the likelihood of completion and severity of injury in rape incidents. Violence Against Women, 4, 694-712.
26.
Maxfield, M.G. ( 1999). The National Incident-Based Reporting System: Research and policy applications. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 15, 119-149.
27.
McCullagh, P. ( 1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 42, 109-142.
28.
Melde, C., & Rennison, C.M. (2008). The effect of gang perpetrated crime on the likelihood of non-lethal victim injury. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 234-251.
29.
Messner, S.F., McHugh, S., & Felson, R.B. ( 2004). Distinctive characteristics of assaults motivated by bias. Criminology, 42, 585-618.
Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C., & Pease, K. ( 1991). The time course of repeat victimization. British Journal of Criminology, 31, 411-414.
33.
Roberts, A. ( 2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies , 11, 82-93.
34.
Sampson, R.J. ( 1987). Personal violence by stranger: An extension and test of the opportunity model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 78, 327-356.
35.
Schnebly, S.M. ( 2002). An examination of the impact of victim, offender, and situational attributes on the deterrent effect of defensive gun use: A research note. Justice Quarterly, 19, 377-398.
36.
Sherman, L.W., Gartin, P.R., & Buerger, M.E. ( 1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
37.
Tark, J., & Kleck, G. ( 2004). Resisting crime: The effects of victim action on the outcomes of crimes. Criminology, 42, 861-909.
38.
Wilcox Rountree, P., Land, K.C., & Miethe, T.D. ( 1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology, 32, 387-414.
39.
Wortley, R. ( 2001). A classification of techniques for controlling situational precipitators of crime. Security Journal, 14, 63-82.
40.
Wortley, R., & Mazerolle, L. ( 2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 1-18). Collompton, UK: Willan.
