Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-3
Single Episodes of Health Information Seeking,Scanning,and Avoidance: Findings of an Experience Sampling Methods Study of German Residents Suffering From Acute or Chronic Illness
Health information behaviors are situational and dynamic in nature. Being confronted with illness-related uncertainty in a specific situation, certain individuals might consistently or temporarily seek, scan, or avoid information and combine these strategies. Relying on an Experience Sampling Method Design study repeatedly querying N = 383 acutely or chronically ill individuals, the study provides a situational view on health information behaviors describing single episodes, distinguishing the “trait” and “state” components of information behaviors, and the between- and within-person relationship between information behaviors. Bayesian multilevel models illustrated that and how health information behaviors consisting of a stable trait and temporal state component were adjusted in certain situations. The manifestations of information seeking, scanning, and avoidance share tangible aspects but differ in the issues of relevance as well as the sources selected. Their relationship suggests their distinct nature as negatively related behaviors.
AhnJ.KimH. K.KahlorL. A.AtkinsonL.NohG.‑Y. (2021). The impact of emotion and government trust on individuals’ risk information seeking and avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Health Communication, 26(10), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1999348
2.
AllenM. S.IliescuD.GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
3.
AndersenK.ShehataA.SkovsgaardM.StrömbäckJ. (2024). Selective news avoidance: Consistency and temporality. Communication Research, Article 00936502231221689. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231221689
4.
AtkinC. (1973). Instrumental utility and information seeking. In ClarkeP. (Ed.), Sage annual reviews of communication research (2nd ed., pp. 205–242). Sage Publ.
5.
BachlM.LinkE.MangoldF.StierS. (2024). Search engine use for health-related purposes: Behavioral data on online health information-seeking in Germany. Health Communication, 39(8), 1651–1664. https://doi.org/10/gtg7gv
6.
BarbourJ. B.RintamakiL. S.RamseyJ. A.BrashersD. E. (2012). Avoiding health information. Journal of Health Communication, 17(2), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.585691
7.
BellA.FairbrotherM.JonesK. (2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x
8.
BowersK. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychology Review, 80, 307–336.
BrinkerD. L.ZhouY.Acevedo CallejasM. L.MacGeorgeE. L. (2020). Increasing information seeking about antibiotic risks: Testing a clinical intervention message using the risk information seeking and processing model. Science Communication, 42(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020914610
12.
BroekhuisM.van VelsenL.FrancoD.de PeaseA.HermensH. (2022). Contextual health information behavior in the daily lives of people with type 2 diabetes: A diary study in Scotland. Health Communication, 37(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1837426
13.
CarcioppoloN.YangF.YangQ. (2016). Reducing, maintaining, or escalating uncertainty? The development and validation of four uncertainty preference scales related to cancer information seeking and avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 21(9), 979–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1184357
14.
CaseD. O.AndrewsJ. E.JohnsonJ. D.AllardS. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(3), 353–362.
15.
ConnerT. S.LehmanB. (2012). Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 89–107). Guilford Press.
16.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004
17.
DelineM. B.KahlorL. A. (2019). Planned risk information avoidance: A proposed theoretical model. Communication Theory, 29(3), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty035
18.
DervinB. (1983). Information as a user construct: The relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In WardS. A.ReedL. J. (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 155–183). Temple University Press.
19.
DubbeldamI.SandersJ.SpoorenW.MeijmanF. J.van den HaakM. (2018). Motives for health information behavior: Patterns more refined than traditional dichotomies. A study among women in a cervix treatment process. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 22(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2018.1425071
20.
EmanuelA. S.KiviniemiM. T.HowellJ. L.HayJ. L.WatersE. A.OromH.ShepperdJ. A. (2015). Avoiding cancer risk information. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.058
21.
EndlerN.MagnussonD. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5), 956–974.
22.
FerreiraD.GoncalvesJ.KostakosV.BarkhuusL.DeyA. K. (2014). Contextual experience sampling of mobile application micro-usage. In LeyG. (Ed.), Exeter performance studies (pp. 91–100). Association for Computing Machinery Inc. (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628367
23.
FoustJ. L.TaberJ. M. (2023). Information avoidance: Past perspectives and future directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, Article 17456916231197668. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231197668
24.
GalarceE. M.RamanadhanS.ViswanathK. (2011). Health information seeking. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 167–180). Routledge.
25.
GermeniE.SchulzP. J. (2014). Information seeking and avoidance throughout the cancer patient journey: Two sides of the same coin? A synthesis of qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology, 23(12), 1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3575
26.
GivenL. M.CaseD. O.WillsonR. (2023). Looking for information: Examining research on how people engage with information (5th ed.). Emerald Publishing Limited.
27.
GoldnerM. (2006). How health status impacts the types of information consumers seek online. Information, Communication & Society, 9(6), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180601063982
28.
GriffinR. J.DunwoodyS.NeuwirthK. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2 Pt 2), S230–S245. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
29.
HektnerJ. M.SchmidtJ. A.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984201
30.
HertwigR.EngelC. (2016). Homo ignorans: Deliberately choosing not to know. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635594
31.
HornikR.ParvantaS.MelloS.FreresD.KellyB.SchwartzJ. S. (2013). Effects of scanning (routine health information exposure) on cancer screening and prevention behaviors in the general population. Journal of Health Communication, 18(12), 1422–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798381
32.
HowellJ. L.ShepperdJ. A. (2016). Establishing an information avoidance scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(12), 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000315
33.
HuR.DengX.SunX.ZhaoY.ZhuQ. (2019). Mobile experience sampling method: Capturing the daily life of elders. In ZhouJ.SalvendyG. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11592, pp. 46–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_4
34.
JensenJ. D.LiuM.CarcioppoloN.JohnK. K.KrakowM.SunY. (2017). Health information seeking and scanning among US adults aged 50–75 years: Testing a key postulate of the information overload model. Health Informatics Journal, 23(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215627290
35.
JensenJ. G.PetersenE.FrandsenT. F. (2022). Seeking and avoiding information: A qualitative study of the information behaviour of cancer patients. Information Research, 27, 2209. https://doi.org/10.47989/colis2209.
JohnsonJ. (2009). An impressionistic mapping of information behavior with special attention to contexts, rationality, and ignorance. Information Processing & Management, 45(5), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.04.005
38.
JohnsonJ. D.MeischkeH. (1993). A comprehensive model of cancer-related information seeking applied to magazines. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00305.x
39.
JohnsonJ. D. E.CaseD. O.AndrewsJ.AllardS. L.JohnsonN. E. (2006). Fields and pathways: Contrasting or complementary views of information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.001
KahlorL. A.OlsonH. C.MarkmanA. B.WangW. (2020). Avoiding trouble: Exploring environmental risk information avoidance intentions. Environment and Behavior, 52(2), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518799149
43.
KimH. K.AhnJ.AtkinsonL.KahlorL. A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicounty comparative study. Science Communication, 42(5), 586–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020959670
KuangK.WilsonS. R. (2017). A meta-analysis of uncertainty and information management in illness contexts. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12299
LambertS. D.LoiselleC. G.MacdonaldM. E. (2009a). An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer: Part 1: Understanding differential patterns of active information seeking. Cancer Nursing, 32(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000343372.24517.bd
48.
LambertS. D.LoiselleC. G.MacdonaldM. E. (2009b). An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer: Part 2: Understanding patterns of information disinterest and avoidance. Cancer Nursing, 32(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000343373.01646.91
49.
LeeC.‑J.ZhaoX.Pena-y-LilloM. (2016). Theorizing the pathways from seeking and scanning to mammography screening. Health Communication, 31(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.942769
50.
LewisN.MartinezL. S. (2023). Information scanning impacts nonmedical drug use among college students: A longitudinal study of scanning effects. Health Communication, 38(10), 2035–2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2051269
51.
LewisN.RossmannC.de BruijnG. J.MartinezL. S. (2022). Dual process models and information engagement: Testing effects of seeking, scanning, and trust in sources on attitudes toward marijuana. Journal of Communication, 72(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab024
52.
LinkE. (2021). Information avoidance during health crises: Predictors of avoiding information about the COVID-19 pandemic among German news consumers. Information Processing and Management, 58(6), 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102714
53.
LinkE. (2024). Health information as “fodder for fears”: A qualitative analysis of types and determinants of the nonuse of health information. Health Communication, 39(13), 3225–3237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2312611
54.
LinkE.BaumannE.KlimmtC. (2021). Explaining online information seeking behaviors in people with different health statuses: German representative cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e25963. https://doi.org/10.2196/25963
55.
LinkE.BaumannE.LeuppertR. (2024). Clarifying the relationship between information seeking and avoidance: Longitudinal analysis of information behaviors and their normative influences. Health Communication, 39(5), 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2201736
56.
LinkE.CzerwinskiF.BaumannE.KrepsG. L.RossetM.SuhrR. (2022). Expanding the Health Information National Trends Survey Research Program internationally to examine global health communication trends: Comparing health information seeking behaviors in the U.S. and Germany. Journal of Health Communication, 27(8), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2134522
57.
LinkE.LeuppertR.BaumannE. (2023). Outcomes of information seeking and avoidance behaviors: Insights from a German longitudinal study. Journal of Health Communication, 28(12), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2268562
58.
McElreathR. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis/CRC Press.
59.
MillerS. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–353.
60.
MuthC.OraveczZ.GabryJ. (2018). User-friendly Bayesian regression modeling: A tutorial with rstanarm and shinystan. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.14.2.p099
61.
NaabT. K.KarnowskiV.SchlützD. (2019). Reporting mobile social media use: How survey and experience sampling measures differ. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(2), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1555799
62.
NarayanB.CaseD. O.EdwardsS. L. (2011). The role of information avoidance in everyday-life information behaviors. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801085
63.
NelissenS.van den BulckJ.BeullensK. (2017). A typology of cancer information seeking, scanning and avoiding: Results from an exploratory cluster analysis. Information Research, 22(2), 747.
64.
NiederdeppeJ.HornikR. C.KellyB. J.FroschD. L.RomantanA.StevensR. S.BargF. K.WeinerJ. L.SchwartzJ. S. (2007). Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Communication, 22(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701454189
65.
OuM.HoS. S. (2022). A meta-analysis of factors related to health information seeking: An integration from six theoretical frameworks. Communication Research, 49(4), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211043024
66.
ParrigonS.WooS. E.TayL.WangT. (2017). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 642–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000111
67.
RainsS. A.RuppelE. K. (2016). Channel complementarity theory and the health information-seeking process: Further investigating the implications of source characteristic complementarity. Communication Research, 43(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510939
68.
RintalaA.WampersM.Myin-GermeysI.ViechtbauerW. (2019). Response compliance and predictors thereof in studies using the experience sampling method. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000662
69.
RoussiP.MillerS. M. (2014). Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(5), 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9553-x
70.
RuppelE. K. (2016). Scanning health information sources: Applying and extending the comprehensive model of information seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1058438
71.
SavolainenR. (1993). The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 13–28.
72.
SavolainenR. (1995) Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life.”Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259–294.
73.
ScharkowM. (2019). The reliability and temporal stability of self-reported media exposure: A meta-analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1594742
74.
ScharkowM.MangoldF.StierS.BreuerJ. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
75.
Schnauber-StockmannA.BayerJ. B.HarariG. M.KarnowskiV. (2024). The situation in media and communication research. Communication Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae021
76.
Schnauber-StockmannA.ScharkowM.KarnowskiV.NaabT. K.SchlützD.PressmannP. (2024). Distinguishing person-specific from situation-specific variation in media use: A meta-analysis. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241262664
ShimM.KellyB.HornikR. (2006). Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. Journal of Health Communication, 11(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600637475
79.
SiebenhaarK. U.KötherA. K.AlpersG. W. (2020). Dealing with the COVID-19 infodemic: Distress by information, information avoidance, and compliance with preventive measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567905
80.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK. (2022). News avoidance. In BorchardG. A. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of journalism (Vol. 1, pp. 1099–1103). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544391199.n274
81.
SoysterP. D.BosleyH. G.ReevesJ. W.AltmanA. D.FisherA. J. (2019). Evidence for the feasibility of person-specific ecological momentary assessment across diverse populations and study designs. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 5(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2019.06
82.
SweenyK.MelnykD.MillerW.ShepperdJ. A. (2010). Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288
83.
Van VelsenL.van Gemert-PijnenJ. E. W. C.BeaujeanD. J. M. A.WentzelJ.van SteenbergenJ. E. (2012). Should health organizations use web 2.0 media in times of an infectious disease crisis? An in-depth qualitative study of citizens’ information behavior during an EHEC outbreak. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e181. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2123
84.
WangL. P.MaxwellS. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000030
YangZ. J.KahlorL. (2013). What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication, 35(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873
88.
ZhangY.LuoN.ShiW. (2016). Experience sampling: A new method to collect “real” data. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(2), 305–316.
89.
ZhengH.WangX.HuangY.‑H. (2023). Fake news in a time of plague: Exploring individuals’ online information management in the COVID-19 era. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107790
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
