How do we know when someone knows us? Does it matter whether the knower is a human or a machine? Following the theory of interpersonal knowledge, a between-subjects experiment investigated whether a doctor’s incorporation of individualized knowledge about a patient’s social or medical history enhances doctor-patient relationships in online conversations. Patients in this study conversed with either a human doctor, an AI doctor, or an AI-assisted human doctor. Following previous research, additional factors such as perceptions of effort, relational closeness, privacy intrusiveness, and the provision of privacy control were assessed. Results showed that an AI doctor enhanced patient satisfaction when it employed social individuation messages, which triggered perceptions of increased effort, but only when patients could activate privacy control. Perception of relational closeness with a human doctor and an AI-assisted human doctor did not seem to require social individuation and privacy control. The study concludes with implications for the theory of interpersonal knowledge and AI-mediated communication research, as well as practical implications for improving chatbot medical systems.
AgakuI. T.AdisaA. O.Ayo-YusufO. A.ConnollyG. N. (2014). Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002079
2.
AktanM. E.TurhanZ.Dolu. (2022). Attitudes and perspectives towards the preferences for artificial intelligence in psychotherapy. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107273
3.
AttreeM. (2001). Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and perspectives of ‘good’ and ‘not so good’ quality care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01689.x
4.
AyersJ. W.PoliakA.DredzeM.LeasE. C.ZhuZ.KelleyJ. B.FaixD. J.GoodmanA. M.LonghurstC. A.HogarthM.SmithD. M. (2023). Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Internal Medicine, 183(6), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838
5.
BatbaatarE.DorjdagvaJ.LuvsannyamA.SavinoM. M.AmentaP. (2017). Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health, 137(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913916634136
6.
BechwatiN. N.XiaL. (2003). Do computers sweat? The impact of perceived effort of online decision aids on consumers’ satisfaction with the decision process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp13-1&2_12
7.
BillingK.NewlandH.SelvaD. (2007). Improving patient satisfaction through information provision. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 35(5), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01514.x
BullerM. K.BullerD. B. (1987). Physicians’ communication style and patient satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136791
ChaikenS. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M.HermanC. P. (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Erlbaum.
12.
ChenJ.ChenC. B.WaltherJ.SundarS. S. (2021). Do you feel special when an AI doctor remembers you? Individuation effects of AI vs. human doctors on user experience [Conference session]. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451735
13.
ChoE.MotalebiN.SundarS. S.AbdullahS. (2022). Alexa as an active listener: How backchanneling can elicit self-disclosure and promote user experience. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555164
14.
ChoE.SundarS. S.AbdullahS.MotalebiN. (2020). Will deleting history make Alexa more trustworthy?: Effects of privacy and content customization on user experience of smart speakers [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376551
15.
DavenportT.KalakotaR. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future healthcare journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
17.
FengY.XieQ. (2019). Privacy concerns, perceived intrusiveness, and privacy controls: An analysis of virtual try-on apps. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1521317
HallJ. A.RoterD. L.RandC. S. (1981). Communication of affect between patient and physician. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136365
20.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
21.
Health Information Privacy. (n.d). U. S. department of health and human services. Retrieved March 13, 2023, from https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html
22.
Hennig-ThurauT.GwinnerK. P.GremlerD. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004003006
23.
HollisK. F. (2016). To share or not to share: Ethical acquisition and use of medical data [Conference session]. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001759/
JakeschM.FrenchM.MaX.HancockJ. T.NaamanM. (2019). AI-mediated communication: How the perception that profile text was written by AI affects trustworthiness [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300469
26.
KangR.DabbishL.FruchterN.KieslerS. (2015). “My data just goes everywhere”: User mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Eleventh USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security. https://doi.org/10.5555/3235866.3235870
27.
KimS. S.KaplowitzS.JohnstonM. V. (2004). The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037
KorschB. M.GozziE. K.FrancisV. (1968). Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics, 42(5), 855–871.
30.
KulkarniP. A.SinghH. (2023). Artificial intelligence in clinical diagnosis: Opportunities, challenges, and hype. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 330(4), 317–318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.11440
LeeS.MoonW.-K.LeeJ.-G.SundarS. S. (2023). When the machine learns from users, is it helping or snooping?Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107427
33.
Leo-LiuJ.Wu-OuyangB. (2022). A “soul” emerges when AI, AR, and Anime converge: A case study on users of the new anime-stylized hologram social robot “Hupo”. New Media & Society, 26(7), 14614448221106030. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221106030
34.
LewZ.WaltherJ. B. (2023). Social scripts and expectancy violations: Evaluating communication with human or AI chatbot interactants. Media Psychology, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2084111
35.
LongoniC.BonezziA.MorewedgeC. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013
36.
MaslachC. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036031
37.
MengJ.DaiY. (. (2021). Emotional support from AI chatbots: Should a supportive partner self-disclose or not?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(4), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab005
38.
MillerG. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. 1956.Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
39.
MolinaM. D.SundarS. S. (2022). When AI moderates online content: Effects of human collaboration and interactive transparency on user trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(4), zmac010. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac010
40.
NassC.MoonY. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
41.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
44.
ŞimşekÖ. F.YalınçetinB. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.006
45.
SparrowB.LiuJ.WegnerD. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
SundarS. S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026
48.
SundarS. S.KangH.WuM.GoE.ZhangB. (2013). Unlocking the privacy paradox: Do cognitive heuristics hold the key?CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468501
49.
SundarS. S.KimJ. (2019). Machine heuristic: When we trust computers more than humans with our personal information [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300768
50.
SvenningssonN.FaraonM. (2019). Artificial intelligence in conversational agents: A study of factors related to perceived humanness in chatbots [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375959.3375973
51.
TolchinskyP. D.McCuddyM. K.AdamsJ.GansterD. C.WoodmanR. W.FromkinH. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.308
52.
TopolE. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Natural Medicines, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
UymazP.UymazA. O.AkgülY. (2023). Assessing the behavioral intention of individuals to use an AI doctor at the primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2233126
55.
WaddellT. F. (2019). Can an algorithm reduce the perceived bias of news? Testing the effect of machine attribution on news readers’ evaluations of bias, anthropomorphism, and credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 82–100.
56.
WaltherJ. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
57.
WaltherJ. B. (2019). Interpersonal versus personal uncertainty and communication in traditional and mediated encounters: A theoretical reformulation. In WilsonS. R.SmithS. W. (Eds.), Reflections on interpersonal communication research (1st ed., pp. 375–393). Cognella Academic Publishing.
58.
WaltherJ. B. (2021). The theory of interpersonal knowledge: Interaction requirements to develop dyad-specific familiarity. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 391–402). Routledge.
59.
WangD.WangL.ZhangZ.WangD.ZhuH.GaoY.FanX.TianF. (2021). “Brilliant AI Doctor” in rural clinics: Challenges in AI-powered clinical decision support system deployment [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445432
WestermanD.CrossA. C.LindmarkP. G. (2019). I believe in a thing called bot: Perceptions of the humanness of “chatbots. Communication Studies, 70(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1557233
WilliamsS.WeinmanJ.DaleJ. (1998). Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: A review. Family Practice, 15(5), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/15.5.480
YangQ.SteinfeldA.ZimmermanJ. (2019). Unremarkable AI: Fitting intelligent decision support into critical, clinical decision-making processes [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300468
66.
YunJ. H.LeeE.KimD. H. (2021). Behavioral and neural evidence on consumer responses to human doctors and medical artificial intelligence. Psychology and Marketing, 38(4), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21445
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
