Organizations compete for scarce resources such as talent. The mobility of employees between organizations means that the inflow side acquires resources at the expense of the outflow side. This study understands employee turnover from one place to another as a mobility network where directed edges indicate migration flows between organizations. Using observational data on the turnover of tenure-line communication faculty in 129 U.S. universities from 2013 to 2022, this paper investigates the formation mechanisms of the interorganizational mobility network. The results show that the creation of migration flows is driven by transitive closure, but not by cyclic closure. Community cohesion is not a driving force of network formation. While low-prestige universities are more likely to be sources of faculty mobility than high-prestige universities, migration flows are commonly observed between organizations with similar levels of prestige. Additionally, the probability of faculty mobility between universities first decreases and then increases with their geographic distance.
AcerbiA. (2020). Cultural evolution in the digital age. Oxford University Press.
2.
AskinN.BothnerM. S. (2016). Status-aspirational pricing: The “Chivas Regal” strategy in U.S. higher education, 2006–2012. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(2), 217–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216629671
BallingerG.HoltomB. (2019). Turnover and social networks. In BrassD. J.BorgattiS. P. (Eds.), Social networks at work (pp. 200–227). Routledge.
5.
BallingerG. A.CrossR.HoltomB. C. (2016). The right friends in the right places: Understanding network structure as a predictor of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000061
6.
BarnettG. A.DanowskiJ. A.FeeleyT. H.StalkerJ. (2010). Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 388–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01487.x
7.
BarnettG. A.FeeleyT. H. (2011). Comparing the NRC and the faculty hiring network methods of ranking doctoral programs in communication. Communication Education, 60(3), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2011.558202
8.
BlockP.StadtfeldC.RobinsG. (2022). A statistical model for the analysis of mobility tables as weighted networks with an application to faculty hiring networks. Social Networks, 68, 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.08.003
9.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). Sage.
10.
BurrisV. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900205
11.
BurtR. S. (2001). Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In RauchJ. E.CasellaA. (Eds.), Networks and markets (pp. 30–74). Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
ButtsC. T. (2019). A dynamic process interpretation of the sparse ERGM reference model. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2018.1490737
13.
CampbellS. W. (2019). From frontier to field: Old and new theoretical directions in mobile communication studies. Communication Theory, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty021
14.
ChenT.-M.BarnettG. A. (2000). Research on international student flows from a macro perspective: A network analysis of 1985, 1989 and 1995. Higher Education, 39(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003961327009
15.
ChettyR.JacksonM. O.KuchlerT.StroebelJ.HendrenN.FlueggeR. B.GongS.GonzalezF.GrondinA.JacobM.JohnstonD.KoenenM.Laguna-MuggenburgE.MudekerezaF.RutterT.ThorN.TownsendW.ZhangR.BaileyM.. . . WernerfeltN. (2022). Social capital I: Measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature, 608(7921), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4
16.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
17.
ColletF.HedströmP. (2013). Old friends and new acquaintances: Tie formation mechanisms in an interorganizational network generated by employee mobility. Social Networks, 35(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.02.005
FeeleyT. H.HwangJ.BarnettG. A. (2008). Predicting employee turnover from friendship networks. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701799790
20.
FeeleyT. H.MoonS.-I.KozeyR. S.SloweA. S. (2010). An erosion model of employee turnover based on network centrality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909881003639544
21.
FeeleyT. H.TutzauerF. (2021). The faculty hiring network for PhD-granting communication programs. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3983–4003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03917-y
22.
FrandsenS. (2012). Organizational image, identification, and cynical distance: Prestigious professionals in a low-prestige organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912438692
23.
FullerB.WaiteA.Torres IrribarraD. (2016). Explaining teacher turnover: School cohesion and intrinsic motivation in Los Angeles. American Journal of Education, 122(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1086/687272
24.
GeistC.McManusP. A. (2008). Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications. Population, Space and Place, 14(4), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.508
25.
GondalN. (2018). Duality of departmental specializations and PhD exchange: A Weberian analysis of status in interaction using multilevel exponential random graph models (mERGM). Social Networks, 55, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.07.005
26.
HeZ.ZhenN.WuC. (2019). Measuring and exploring the geographic mobility of American professors from graduating institutions: Differences across disciplines, academic ranks, and genders. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.05.001
LeonardiP.ContractorN. (2018). Better people analytics: Measure who they know, not just who they are. Harvard Business Review, 96(6), 90–101.
30.
LeonardiP. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536
31.
LiyanageC.ElhagT.BallalT.LiQ. (2009). Knowledge communication and translation: A knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962914
32.
LusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG. (Eds.). (2012). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press.
33.
MagdolL. (2000). The people you know: The impact of residential mobility on mothers’ social network ties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500172002
34.
MaiB.LiuJ.González-BailónS. (2015). Network effects in the academic market: Mechanisms for hiring and placing PhDs in communication (2007–2014). Journal of Communication, 65(3), 558–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12158
35.
MawdsleyJ. K.SomayaD. (2016). Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315616459
MignonacK.HerrbachO.GuerreroS. (2006). The interactive effects of perceived external prestige and need for organizational identification on turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.006
38.
MillerC. C.GlickW. H.CardinalL. B. (2005). The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: Accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(5), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.325
39.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
40.
MorrisM.HandcockM. S.HunterD. R. (2008). Specification of exponential-family random graph models: Terms and computational aspects. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v024.i04
41.
NivalainenS. (2004). Determinants of family migration: Short moves vs. long moves. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-003-0131-8
42.
PollockT. G.ChenG.JacksonE. M.HambrickD. C. (2010). How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.003
43.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658
ShankarK.GhoshS. (2013). A theory of worker turnover and knowledge transfer in high-technology industries. Journal of Human Capital, 7(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1086/671188
46.
ShumateM.PalazzoloE. T. (2010). Exponential random graph (p*) models as a method for social network analysis in communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(4), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.527869
47.
SommerfeldtE. J.PilnyA.SafferA. J. (2023). Interorganizational homophily and social capital network positions in Malaysian civil society. Communication Monographs, 90, 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2022.2067346
StivalaA.RobinsG.LomiA. (2020). Exponential random graph model parameter estimation for very large directed networks. PLoS One, 15(1), e0227804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227804
50.
TasselliS.CaimoA. (2019). Does it take three to dance the Tango? Organizational design, triadic structures and boundary spanning across subunits. Social Networks, 59, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.04.002
51.
TreemJ. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.646487
52.
VardamanJ. M.TaylorS. G.AllenD. G.GondoM. B.AmisJ. M. (2015). Translating Intentions to behavior: The interaction of network structure and behavioral intentions in understanding employee turnover. Organization Science, 26(4), 1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0982
53.
WapmanK. H.ZhangS.ClausetA.LarremoreD. B. (2022). Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention. Nature, 610, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05222-x
54.
WeggeS. A. (1998). Chain migration and information networks: Evidence from nineteenth-century Hesse-Cassel. The Journal of Economic History, 58(4), 957–986. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700021689
55.
WeijtersB.GeuensM.SchillewaertN. (2009). The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.09.003
56.
WilliamsD. (2006). On and off the ’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
57.
WindzioM. (2018). The network of global migration 1990–2013: Using ERGMs to test theories of migration between countries. Social Networks, 53, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.08.006
58.
XuY. (2022). Ecological influences on the formation of the hiring network in the communication job market, 2015 to 2019. Communication Research, 49(5), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211034687
59.
YuanY. C.FulkJ.MongeP. R. (2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298067
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
