Adolescents’ Multi-Layered Media Processing: A Panel Study on Positive and Negative Perceptions Toward Ideals and Adolescents’ Appearance Anxiety

Abstract

Selective exposure literature indicates that not all users take away the same messages from their media exposure; it is suggested that viewers are not merely exposed but rather reactive to multiple—and possibly opposing—messages. The current study aims to introduce an active media-processing perspective, focusing specifically on the media-body image association among an early adolescent sample. Results of a three-wave longitudinal survey among 971 early adolescents (M_age = 11.14; SD = 1.13) show that media-focused peer interactions (W1), but not media exposure (W1), were associated with contradictory perceptions of attractiveness (i.e., perceived benefits and perceived costs for investing in appearance) (W2). Polynomial regression analyses pointed out that the association between these contradictory perceptions (i.e., interaction between benefits and costs; W2) was curvilinearily related to body image investment (W3). The findings emphasize the variable vulnerability of adolescents to the media effect and the importance of acknowledging multi-layered media messages.

Keywords

media peers viewer agency adolescents body image investment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G

. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

Austin

E. W.

Meili

H. K.

(1994). Effects of interpretations of televised alcohol portrayals on children’s alcohol beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/01080/08838159409364276

Bandura

(1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Beentjes

Konig

(2013). Does exposure to music videos predict adolescents’ sexual attitudes? European Scientific Journal, 9, 1–20. http://www.eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/1066

Beyens

Pouwels

J. L.

van Driel

I. I.

Keijsers

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2020). The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports, 10, 10763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7

Biocca

F. A.

(1988). Opposing conceptions of the audience: The active and passive hemispheres of mass communication theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 11, 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1988.11678679

Burnette

C. B.

Kwitowski

M. A.

Mazzeo

S. E.

(2017). “I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media:” A qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image, 23, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.09.001

Cohen

Irwin

Newton-John

Slater

(2019). #Bodypositivity: A content analysis of body positive accounts on Instagram. Body Image, 29, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.02.007

10.

Cohen

Newton-John

Slater

. (2021). The case for body positivity on social media: Perspectives on current advances and future directions. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(13), https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1359105320912450

11.

Daniels

E. A.

Zurbriggen

E. L.

(2016). The price of sexy: Viewers’ perceptions of a sexualized versus nonsexualized Facebook profile photograph. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000048

12.

Edwards

J. R.

Parry

M. E.

(1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822

13.

Edwards

J. R

. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029

14.

Festinger

(1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University.

15.

Fischer

Greitemeyer

Kastenmüll

Vogrincic

Sauer

(2011). The effects of risk-glorifying media exposure on risk-positive cognitions, emotions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022267

16.

Fitzsimmons-Craft

E. E.

(2011). Social psychological theories of disordered eating in college women: Review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1224–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.011

17.

Gleeson

Frith

(2006). (De)constructing body image. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306058851

18.

Groesz

L. M.

Levine

M. P.

Murnen

S. K.

(2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10005

19.

Hall

H. K.

Millear

P. M. R.

Summers

M. J.

Isbel

(2021). Longitudinal research on perspective taking in adolescence: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 6, 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00150-9

20.

Hart

T. A.

Flora

D. B.

Palyo

S. A.

Fresco

D. M.

Holle

Heimberg

R. G.

(2008). Development and examination of the social appearance anxiety scale. Assessment, 15, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306673

21.

Harter

(2015). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. Guilford Press.

22.

Jones

D. C.

Vigfusdottir

T. H.

Lee

(2004). Body image and the appearance culture among adolescent girls and boys: An examination of friend conversations, peer criticism, appearance magazines, and the internalization of appearance Ideals. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258847

23.

Kenny

O’Malley-Keighran

M-P.

Molcho

Kelly

(2017). Peer influences on adolescent body image: Friends or foes? Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 768–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416665478

24.

Kleemans

Daalmans

Carbaat

Anschïtz

(2018). picture perfect: The direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology, 21, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392

25.

Knobloch-Westerwick

(2014). Choice and preference in media use. Advances in selective exposure theory and research. Routledge.

26.

Kraus

Myrick

J. G.

(2018). Feeling bad about feel-good ads: The emotional and body-image ramifications of body-positive media. Communication Research Reports, 35, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1383233

27.

Levine

M. P.

Murnen

S. K

. (2009). “Everybody knows that mass media are/are not [pick one] a cause of eating disorders”: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(1), 9–42.

28.

Livingstone

(1998). Making sense of television. The psychology of audience interpretation. Routledge.

29.

Moores

(1993). Interpreting audiences. The ethnography of media consumption. SAGE.

30.

Morley

(1993). Active audience theory: Pendulums and pitfalls. Journal of Communication, 43, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01299.x

31.

Mulgrew

K. E.

McCulloch

Farren

Prichard

Lim

M. S. C.

(2018). This girl can #jointhemovement: Effectiveness of physical functionality-focused campaigns for women’s body satisfaction and exercise intent. Body Image, 24, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.11.007

32.

Nabi

R. L.

Clark

(2008). Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication, 58, 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00392.x

33.

Nelson

A. A.

Brown

C. S.

(2019). Too pretty for homework: Sexualized gender stereotypes predict academic attitudes for gender-typical early adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618776132

34.

Northup

Liebler

C. M.

(2010). The good, the bad, and the beautiful. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.496917

35.

Petersen

A. C.

Crockett

Richards

Boxer

(1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537962

36.

Rodgers

R. F.

Paxton

S. J.

Wertheim

E. H.

(2021). #Take idealized bodies out of the picture: A scoping review of social media content aiming to protect and promote positive body image. Body Image, 38, 10–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.009

37.

Rodin

Silberstein

Striegel-Moore

(1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In Sonderegger

T. B.

(Ed.), Psychology and gender (pp. 267–307). University of Nebraska Press.

38.

Rubin

A. M.

(1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In Bryant

Zillmann

(Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417–436). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

39.

Saiphoo

A. N.

Vahedi

(2019). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028

40.

Scott

J. F.

(1971). Internalization of norms: A sociological theory of moral commitment. Prentice-Hall.

41.

Scully

Swords

Nixon

(2020). Social comparisons on social media: Online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.93

42.

Shroff

Thompson

J. K.

(2006). Peer influences, body-image dissatisfaction, eating dysfunction and self-esteem in adolescent girls. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306065015

43.

Slater

. (2021). The case for body positivity on social media: Perspectives on current advances and future directions. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(13), https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1359105320912450

44.

Smith

S. M.

Fabrigar

L. R.

Norris

M. E.

(2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 464–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x

45.

Steinberg

(2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005

46.

Tiggemann

Hayden

Brown

Veldhuis

(2018). The effect of Instagram “likes” on women’s social comparison and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 26, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.07.002

47.

Trekels

Eggermont

(2017). Beauty is good: The appearance culture, the internalization of appearance ideals, and dysfunctional appearance beliefs among tweens. Human Communication Research, 43, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12100

48.

Trekels

Eggermont

(2018). “I can/should look like a media figure”: The association between direct and indirect media exposure and teens’ sexualizing appearance behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(3), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1387754

49.

Trekels

Eggermont

(2021). Me, myself, and my favorite media figure: An objectification perspective on the role of media and peers in early adolescents’ self-sexualization. Mass Communication and Society, 24(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1817943

50.

Verheijen

G. P.

Burk

W. J.

Stoltz

S. E. M. J.

van den Berg

Y. H. M.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2018). Friendly fire: Longitudinal effects of exposure to violent video games on aggressive behavior in adolescent friendship dyads. Aggressive Behavior, 44(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21748

51.

Ward

L. M.

(2016). Media and sexualization: A state of empirical research, 1995–2015. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496

52.

Ward

L. M.

Day

K. M.

Epstein

(2006). Uncommonly good: Exploring how mass media may be a positive influence on young women’s sexual health and development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.162

53.

Webb

H. J.

Zimmer-Gembeck

M. J.

Donovan

C. L.

(2014). The appearance culture between friends and adolescent appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.008

54.

Wertheim

E. H.

Paxton

S. J.

Schutz

H. K.

Muir

S. L.

(1997). Why do adolescent girls watch their weight? An interview study examining sociocultural pressures to be thin. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00368-6

55.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

56.

Zillmann

Bryant

(1985). Selective-exposure phenomena. In Zillmann

Bryant

(Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 1–33). Lawrence Erlbaum.

57.

Zsakai

Karkus

Utczas

Bodzsar

E. B.

(2017). Body structure and physical self-concept in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615602757

58.

Zuair

A. A.

Sopory

(2022). Effects of media health literacy school-based interventions on adolescents’ body image concerns, eating concerns, and thin-internalization attitudes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Communication, 37(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1813954