The enjoyment of suspenseful competitions is thought to be motivated by outcome preferences and outcome uncertainty. Prior research has focused more on the former than the latter. The current research considers how outcome uncertainty predicts a global evaluation of enjoyment for competitions in which the personal stakes associated with the outcome are relatively low. Using moment-to-moment (MTM) measures of suspense, we find that competitions with more (vs. less) outcome uncertainty positively predict both total suspense and a set of key features aggregated from MTM suspense (slope, end, peak, and time-to-peak). A global evaluation of enjoyment was also predicted by these same measures. Further, enjoyment in each experiment was more highly correlated with peak suspense than it was with total suspense. Our contribution therefore is a nuanced description of how certain key features of suspenseful competitions with low-stakes outcomes influence a global evaluation of enjoyment.
BaumgartnerH.SujanM.PadgettD. (1997). Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: The integration of moment-to-moment responses into overall judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151860
5.
BerlyneD. E. (1967). Arousal and reinforcement. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 3–110). University of Nebraska Press.
CooperJ. M. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. SAGE.
9.
DavidP.HortonB.GermanT. (2008). Dynamics of entertainment and affect in a super bowl audience. Communication Research, 35, 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315965
10.
DelatorreP.LeónC.SalgueroA.Palomo-DuarteM.GervásP. (2018). Confronting a paradox: A new perspective of the impact of uncertainty in suspense. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01392
11.
de WiedM. (1995). The role of temporal expectancies in the production of film suspense. Poetics, 23, 107–123.
12.
ElyJ.FrankelA.KamenicaE. (2015). Suspense and surprise. Journal of Political Economy, 123, 215–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/677350
13.
FredricksonB. L. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 577–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402808
14.
HallA. E. (2015). Entertainment-oriented gratifications of sports media: Contributors to suspense, hedonic enjoyment, and appreciation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029124
15.
HirtE. R.ZillmannD.EricksonG. A.KennedyC. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724
16.
HseeC. K.AbelsonR. P. (1991). Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.341
17.
KahnemanD.FredricksonB. L.SchreiberC. A.RedelmeierD. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x
18.
KnoblochS.PatzigG.MendeA.-M.HastallM. (2004). Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31, 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261517
19.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.DavidP.EastinM. S.TamboriniR.GreenwoodD. (2009). Sports spectators’ suspense: Affect and uncertainty in sports entertainment. Journal of Communication, 59, 750–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01456.x
20.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.KeplingerC. (2007). Thrilling news: Factors generating suspense during news exposure. Media Psychology, 9(1), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260709336809
21.
LarsenR. J.FredricksonB. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–60). Russell SAGE Foundation.
22.
LehneM.KoelschS. (2015). Toward a general psychological model of tension and suspense. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00079
23.
LiZ.-W.BramleyN. R.GureckisT. M. (2019, July 27). The critical moment is coming: Modeling the dynamics of suspense [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX.
MadrigalR.BeeC.ChenJ.LaBargeM. (2011). The effect of suspense on enjoyment following a desirable outcome: The mediating role of relief. Media Psychology, 14, 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.596469
26.
NabiR. L.KrcmarM. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14, 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00316.x
PawlowskiT.NalbantisG.CoatesD. (2018). Perceived game uncertainty, suspense and the demand for sport. Economic Inquiry, 56, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12462
29.
PetersonE. M.RaneyA. A. (2008). Reconceptualizing and reexamining suspense as a predictor of mediated sports enjoyment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437263
30.
RaneyA. A. (2003a). Disposition-based theories of emotion. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 61–84). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
RaneyA. A. (2003b). Enjoyment of sports spectatorship. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 397–416). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
RaneyA. A. (2006). Why we watch and enjoy mediated sports. In RaneyA. A.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 339–356). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
RossW. T.SimonsonI. (1991). Evaluations of pairs of experiences: A preference for happy endings. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960040405
34.
RoxboroughS. (2016, August18). Rio Olympics Worldwide Audience to Top 3.5 Billion, IOC Estimates. The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ general-news/rio-olympics-worldwide-audience-top-920526/
35.
SchmidtS. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
36.
Su-linG.TuggleC. A.MitrookM. A.CoussementS. H.ZillmannD. (1997). The thrill of a close game: Who enjoys it and who doesn’t?Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 21, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019372397021001004
37.
TaylorS. H.LedbetterA. M.MazerJ. P. (2020). Initial specification and empirical test of media enjoyment theory. Communication Research, 47, 1246–1271.
VordererP.KnoblochS.SchrammH. (2001). Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers’ experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3, 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0304_03
40.
Woltman ElpersJ.MukherjeeA.HoyerW. (2004). Humor in television advertising: A moment-to-moment analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/425094
41.
ZillmannD. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (Eds.), Social psychology: A sourcebook (pp. 221–240). The Guilford Press.
42.
ZillmannD. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135–167). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
ZillmannD. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (1994). Entertainment as media effect. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 437–461). Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
ZillmannD.BryantJ.SapolskyB. S. (1989). Enjoyment from sports spectatorship. In GoldsteinJ. H. (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (2nd ed., pp. 241–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
