Minorities often express dissatisfaction and frustration with media depictions of their ingroup motivating them to engage in strategies that can restore a positive group identity. Based on the dual model of collective action and relying on two studies, we examined if exposure to negative news media can motivate collective action among Muslim Americans through increases in collective efficacy and group-based anger. Data from a four-wave longitudinal survey revealed that Time 1 self-reported exposure to negative news about Muslims increased Time 4 collective action intentions through increases in Time 3 efficacy, but not anger. Experimental results revealed that perceived news accuracy moderates these effects. Specifically, exposure to negative news about one’s ingroup motivates collective action when the news is perceived as biased but dampens these efforts if perceived to be accurate. These findings reveal how and under what conditions exposure to negative news coverage can lead to collective action among minorities.
AbramsJ. R.GilesH. (2007). Ethnic identity gratifications selection and avoidance by African Americans: A group vitality and social identity gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 9, 115-134. doi:10.1080/15213260709336805
2.
AhmedS.MatthesJ. (2017). Media representations of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79, 219-244. doi:10.1177/1748048516656305
3.
AlsultanyE. (2012). Arabs and Muslims in the media: Race and representations after 9/11. New York: New York University Press.
4.
AmerM. M.BagasraA. (2013). Psychological research with Muslim Americans in the age of Islamophobia: Trends, challenges, and recommendations. American Psychologist, 68, 134-144. doi:10.1037/a0032167
5.
AppiahO.Knobloch-WesterwickS.AlterS. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63, 517-534. doi:10.1111/jcom.12032
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
7.
BanjoO. O. (2013). For us only? Examining the effect of viewing context on black audiences’ perceived influence of black entertainment. Race and Social Problems, 5, 309-322. doi:10.1007/s12552-013-9106-x
8.
BeckerJ. C.TauschN.SpearsR.ChristO. (2011). Committed dis(s)idents: Participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1104-1116. doi:10.1177/0146167211407076
9.
Behm-MorawitzE.OrtizM. (2013). Race, ethnicity, and the media. In DillK. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of media psychology (pp. 252-266). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
CalfanoB. R.DjupeP. A.CoxD.JonesR. (2016). Muslim mistrust: The resilience of negative public attitudes after complimentary information. Journal of Media and Religion, 15, 29-42. doi:10.1080/15348423.2015.1131041
11.
CarneyN. (2016). All lives matter, but so does race: Black Lives Matter and the evolving role of social media. Humanity & Society, 40, 180-199. doi:10.1177/0160597616643868
12.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204. doi:10.1037/a0013965
13.
CheryanS.MoninB. (2005). Where are you really from? Asian Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 717-730. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.717
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
16.
DixonT. L.WilliamsC. L. (2015). The changing misrepresentation of race and crime on network and cable news. Journal of Communication, 65, 24-39. doi:10.1111/jcom.12133
17.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-58. doi:10.1002/ejsp.231
18.
EllemersN.BarretoM. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749-768. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01621.x
19.
FujiokaY. (2005). Black media images as perceived threat to African American ethnic identity: Coping responses, perceived public perception, and attitudes toward affirmative action. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 450-467. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_6
20.
GlasfordD. E.CalcagnoJ. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 323-328. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
21.
GrantP. R.AbramsD.RobertsonD. W.GarayJ. (2014). Predicting protests by disadvantaged skilled immigrants: A test of an integrated Social Identity, Relative Deprivation, Collective Efficacy (SIRDE) model. Social Justice Research, 28, 76-101. doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0229-z
22.
GuntherA. C.SchmittK. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55-70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
23.
HarwoodJ.RoyA. (2005). Social identity theory and mass communication research. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189-212). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
24.
HarwoodJ.VinczeL. (2015). Ethnolinguistic identification, vitality, and gratifications for television use in a bilingual media environment. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 73-89. doi:10.1111/josi.12097
25.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
26.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2018). How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 1-20. doi:10.1111/bjso.12220
27.
HowardP. N.DuffyA.FreelonD.HussainM.MariW.MazaidM. (2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? (Project on Information Technology and Political Islam). Seattle: Department of Communication, University of Washington.
28.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
29.
ItoT. A.LarsenJ. T.SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.887
30.
IyerA.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587. doi:10.1177/0146167206297402
JostJ. T.BeckerJ.OsborneD.BadaanV. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99-108. doi:10.1177/0963721417690633
33.
JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41, 627-643. doi:10.1177/0093650212447944
34.
LaneD.ColesS.SaleemM. (2019). Solidarity and social movement messages: The effects of dominant Group identity on perceived racism and movement support. Human Communication Research, 45(1), 1-26. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqy011
35.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
36.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
37.
MastroD. (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 325-341). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
MoskalenkoS.McCauleyC. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 239-260. doi:10.1080/09546550902765508
39.
MummendeyA.KesslerT.KlinkA.MielkeR. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
40.
MutzD. C.GoldmanS. K. (2010). Mass media. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 241-258). London, England: SAGE.
41.
NisbetE. C.OstmanR.ShanahanJ. (2009). Public opinion toward Muslim Americans: Civil liberties and the role of religiosity, ideology, and media use. In SinnoA. (Ed.), Muslims in western politics (pp. 161-199). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
42.
OritzM.Behm-MorawitzL. (2015). Latinos’ perceptions of intergroup relations in the US: The cultivation of group-based attitudes and beliefs from English and Spanish-language television. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 90-105. doi: 10.1111/josi.12098
PowellK. A. (2011). Framing Islam: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies, 62, 90-112. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.533599
45.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
46.
PriorM. (2013). The challenge of measuring media exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, 30, 620-634. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.819539
47.
RamasubramanianS.DoshiM. J.SaleemM. (2017). Mainstream versus ethnic media: How they shape ethnic pride and self-esteem among ethnic minority audiences. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1879-1899.
48.
SaleemM.ProtS.AndersonC.A.LemieuxA. (2017). Exposure to muslims in media and support for aggressive public policies: The mediating role of aggressive perceptions. Communication Research, 44 (6), 841-869. doi: 10.1177/0093650215619214
49.
SaleemM.RamasubramanianS. (2017). Muslim Americans’ responses to social identity threats: Effects of media representations and experiences of discrimination. Media Psychology, 22 (3), 373-393. doi:10.1080/15213269.2017.1302345
50.
SaleemM.WojcieszakM.Hawkins++I.Miao++L.RamasubramanianS. (2019). Social identity threats: How media and discrimination affect muslim Americans’ identification as Americans and Trust in the U.S. Government. Journal of Communication, 69 (2), 214-236. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqz001
51.
SaleemM.YangG. L.RamasubramanianS. (2016). Reliance on direct and mediated contact: Longitudinal effects of sources of information on public policies representative of outgroup harm. Journal of Communication, 66, 604-624. doi:10.1111/jcom.12234
52.
SchmaderT.BlockK.LickelB. (2015). Social identity threat in response to stereotypic film portrayals: Effects of self-conscious emotion and implicit ingroup attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 54-72. doi:10.1111/josi.12096
53.
SchmuckD.MatthesJ.PaulF. H. (2017). Negative stereotypical portrayals of Muslims in right-wing populist campaigns: Perceived discrimination, social identity threats, and hostility among young Muslim adults. Journal of Communication, 67, 610-634. doi:10.1111/jcom.12313
54.
ShiJ.HaoZ.SaeriA. K.CuiL. (2015). The dual-pathway model of collective action: Impacts of types of collective action and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 45-65. doi:10.1177/1368430214524288
55.
SirinS. R.FineM. (2008). Muslim American youth: Understanding hyphenated identities through multiple methods. New York: New York University Press.
56.
SmithE. R.SegerC. R.MackieD. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 431-446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431
57.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
58.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148. doi:10.1037/a0022728
59.
TsfatiY. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57, 632-651. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
60.
TsfatiY.CohenJ. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 28-51. doi:10.1177/1081180X05280776
61.
TukachinskyR.MastroD.YarchiM. (2015). Documenting portrayals of race/ethnicity on primetime television over a 20-year span and their association with national-level racial/ethnic attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 17-38. doi:10.1111/josi.12094
62.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
63.
Van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180-199. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
64.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
65.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
66.
VerkuytenM. (2016). The integration paradox: Empiric evidence from the Netherlands. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 583-596. doi:10.1177/0002764216632838
67.
WardL. M. (2004). Wading through the stereotypes: Positive and negative associations between media use and Black adolescents’ conceptions of self. Developmental Psychology, 40, 284-294. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.284
68.
WrightS. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 859-879. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01628.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
