The purpose of this study was to investigate (a) how allegations of gender discrimination affect consumers’ relationship with the brand in question, and (b) individual-level factors that affect consumers’ negative affective response to the allegations and eventually, consumer-brand relationships. Findings from a survey conducted among 473 Americans indicate that individuals’ relational perceptions with a corporate brand whose products/services they consume are negatively affected by allegations of misconduct, in this case, gender discrimination. Results revealed that individuals’ moral orientation and anticorporate sentiment predicted their perceptions of moral inequity of corporate behavior, which in turn affected their negative affective response to the allegations. Such negative affective response then affected individuals’ consumer–corporate brand relationships.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2.
AggarwalP. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87-101. doi:10.1086/383426
3.
AhluwaliaR.Gürhan-CanliZ. (2000). The effects of extensions on the family brand name: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 371-381. doi:10.1086/317591
4.
AntonettiP.MaklanS. (2014). An extended model of moral outrage at corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 429-444. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2487-y
5.
AquinoK.FreemanD.ReedA.IILimV. K.FelpsW. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 123-141. doi:10.1037/a0015406
6.
ArgentiP. A.DruckenmillerB. (2004). Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 368-374. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540005
7.
AverillJ. R. (1993). Illusions of anger. In FelsonR. B.TedeschiJ. T. (Eds.), Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives (pp. 171-192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10123-007
8.
BartlettM. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296-298.
BreivikE.ThorbjornsenH. (2008). Consumer brand relationships: An investigation of two alternative models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 443-472. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0115-z
12.
BrossardD.ScheufeleD. A.KimE.LewensteinB. V. (2009). Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 546-558. doi:10.1177/0963662507087304
13.
BrownK. A.WhiteC. L. (2010). Organization–public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 75-92. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2010.504792
14.
BrunkK. H. (2010). Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions—A consumer perspective of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research, 63, 255–262. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.011
15.
CastelliL.CarraroL. (2011). Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1013-1016. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.016
16.
ChoiJ. (2011). Korean anti-corporate emotion: Development and validation. Korean Corporation Management Review, 18, 133–145.
17.
ChoiY.LinY. H. (2009). Consumer responses to Mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 198-207. doi:10.1080/10627260802557506
18.
ChomskyN. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.
19.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163-176. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
20.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2007). The negative communication dynamic: Exploring the impact of stakeholder affect on behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management, 11, 300-312. doi:10.1108/13632540710843913
21.
DeemR. (2003). Gender, organizational cultures and the practices of manager-academics in UK universities. Gender, Work & Organization, 10, 239-259. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00013
22.
De GeorgeR. T. (1986). Business ethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
23.
DuncanT.MoriartyS. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-13. doi:10.2307/1252157
FergusonM. A. (1984, August). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL.
FlewA. (1976). The profit motive. Ethics, 86, 312-322. doi:10.1086/292007
28.
FournierS. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343-373. doi:10.1086/209515
GrappiS.RomaniS. (2015). Company post-crisis communication strategies and the psychological mechanism underlying consumer reactions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 22-45. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.924839
31.
GrappiS.RomaniS.BagozziR. P. (2013). Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: Moral emotions and virtues. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1814-1821. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.002
32.
GrégoireY.FisherR. J. (2008). Customer betrayal and retaliation: When your best customers become your worst enemies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 247-261. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0054-0
33.
HaileL.GallagherM.Jr.RobertsonR. J. (2015). The affective response to exercise. In Perceived exertion laboratory manual (pp. 29-40). New York, NY: Springer.
34.
HessR. L.GanesanS.KleinN. M. (2003). Service failure and recovery: The impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 127-145. doi:10.1177/0092070302250898
35.
HollenbeckC. R.ZinkhanG. M. (2006). Consumer activism on the Internet: The role of anti-brand communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 479-485.
36.
HolmbeckG. M. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 699-710. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599
37.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
38.
HuangY. H. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 61-90. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1301_4
39.
HuberF.VollhardtK.MatthesI.VogelJ. (2010). Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1113-1120.
40.
HuntS. D.Vasquez-ParragaA. Z. (1993). Organizational consequences, marketing ethics, and salesforce supervision. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 78. doi:10.2307/3172515
JinY. (2010). Making sense sensibly in crisis communication: How publics’ crisis appraisals influence their negative emotions, coping strategy preferences, and crisis response acceptance. Communication Research, 37, 522-552. doi:10.1177/0093650210368256
43.
JinY.PangA.CameronG. T. (2007). Integrated crisis mapping: Towards a publics-based, emotion-driven conceptualization in crisis communication. Sphera Publica, 7, 81-96. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2012.676747
44.
KimH. J.ChoN. S.KangK. H. (2013, November29). Exploring the moderating role of corporate social responsibility on anti-corporate sentiment initiated by a crisis: A case study of Lotte and Doosan. Paper presented at the Korean Academic Society for Public Relations, Seoul, South Korea.
45.
KimJ.-N.GrunigJ. E. (2011). Problem solving and communication action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61, 120-149. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
46.
KimJ.-N.KimS.KimS.-Y.JunS.-I.KrishnaA. (2012). Understanding public fears on new food technologies: Testing joint effects of cross-situational value predispositions and situational perceptions on risk perception about the GMO food issue. Health Communication Research, 6, 1-42.
47.
KimJ.-N.KrishnaA. (2014). Publics and lay informatics: A review of the situational theory of problem solving. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38, 71-105. doi:10.1080/23808985.2014.11679159
48.
KimJ.-N.RheeY. (2011). Strategic thinking about employee communication behavior (ECB) in public relations: Testing the models of megaphoning and scouting effects in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 243-268. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2011.582204
49.
KimS.ShimK. J. (in press). Why people hate corporations: Conceptualization and scale development of anti-corporate sentiment in South Korea.
50.
KimS.KimJ.-N.TamL. (2015). Think socially but act publicy: Refocusing CSR as corporate public responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs, 16, 91-104. doi:10.1002/pa.1560
51.
KleinJ.DawarN. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203-217. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003
52.
KrishnaA. (2017). Motivation with misinformation: Conceptualizing lacuna individuals and publics as knowledge deficient, issue-negative activists. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 176-193. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2017.1363047
53.
KrishnaA. (2018). Poison or prevention? Understanding the linkages between vaccine-negative individuals’ knowledge deficiency, motivations, and active communication behaviors. Health Communication, 33, 1088-1096. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1331307
54.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. In PervinL.A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609-637). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55-65.
56.
LeeH. M.JunJ. W. (2013). Explicating public diplomacy as organization–public relationship (OPR): An empirical investigation of OPRs between the US embassy in Seoul and South Korean college students. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25, 411-425. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2013.795863
57.
LindenmeierJ.SchleerC.PriclD. (2012). Consumer outrage: Emotional reactions to unethical corporate behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1364-1373. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.022
58.
MerollaA. J.HarmanJ. J. (2018). Relationship-specific hope and constructive conflict management in adult romantic relationships: Testing an accommodation framework. Communication Research, 45, 339-364. doi:10.1177/0093650215627484
59.
MillJ. S. (1979). Utilitarianism (SherG., Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published in 1861)
60.
OrtonyA.CloreG. L.CollinsA. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
ParkS. H.KimJ. N.KrishnaA. (2014). Bottom-up building of an innovative organization: Motivating employee intrapreneurship and scouting and their strategic value. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 531-560. doi:10.1177/0893318914541667
ReidenbachR. E.RobinD. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 639-653. doi:10.1007/BF0038339
64.
RomaniS.GrappiS.BagozziR. (2013). My anger is your gain, my contempt is your loss: Explaining consumer responses to corporate wrongdoing. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 1029-1042. doi:10.1002/mar.20664
65.
RomaniS.GrappiS.ZarantonelloL.BagozziR. P. (2015). The revenge of the consumer! How brand moral violations lead to consumer anti-brand activism. Journal of Brand Management, 22, 658-672. doi:10.1057/bm.2015.38
66.
RoscignoV. J. (2007). The face of discrimination: How race and gender impact work and home lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
67.
RyanJ. C. (2016). Old knowledge for new impacts: Equity theory and workforce nationalization. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1587-1592. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.022
68.
SadlerD. (2004). Anti-corporate campaigning and corporate “social” responsibility: Towards alternative spaces of citizenship?Antipode, 36, 851-870. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00458.x
69.
ScanlonT. M. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen’s philosophy: 3 Sen and consequentialism. Economics & Philosophy, 17, 39-50.
70.
SchwarzN.CloreJ. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
71.
ShenH. (2017). Refining organization–public relationship quality measurement in student and employee samples. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 994-1010. doi:10.1177/1077699016674186
72.
ShimK. J. (2013). The role of ethical evaluation of corporate social responsibility in the perception of corporate hypocrisy, the intention of opinioned communication and behavior toward a firm (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
73.
SlovicP.PetersE.FinucaneM.MacGregorD. (2005). Affect, risk and decision making. Health Psychology, 24, S35-S40. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
74.
SoJ.KuangK.ChoH. (2016). Reexamining fear appeal models from cognitive appraisal theory and functional emotion theory perspectives. Communication Monographs, 83, 120-144. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1044257
75.
SohnY. J.LariscyR. W. (2015). A “buffer” or “boomerang?”—The role of corporate reputation in bad times. Communication Research, 42, 237-259. doi:10.1177/0093650212466891
76.
SpielthennerG. (2005). Consequentialism or deontology?Philosophia, 33, 217-235.
77.
Sudbury-RileyL.KohlbacherF. (2016). Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2697-2710. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005
78.
TrumpR. K. (2014). Connected consumers’ responses to negative brand actions: The roles of transgression self-relevance and domain. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1824-1830. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.007
79.
TulejaT. (1985). Beyond the bottom line: How business leaders are turning principles into profits. New York, NY: Facts on File.
80.
VecchioR. P. (1981). An individual-differences interpretation of the conflicting predictions generated by equity and expectancy theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 470-481. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.470
81.
VelasquezM. (2015). Philosophy: A text with readings (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
82.
WoodB. D.VedlitzA. (2007). Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 552-568.
