Past work suggests that the priorities for information propagation in social media may be markedly different from the priorities for news selection in traditional media outlets. We explore this possibility here, focusing on the tone of both newspaper and Twitter content following changes in the U.S. unemployment rate, from 2008 to 2014. Results strongly support the expectation that while the tone of newspaper content exhibits stronger reactions to negative information, the tone of Twitter content reacts more strongly to positive economic shifts.
AltheideD. L. (1997). The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear. Sociological Quarterly the Sociological Quarterly, 38, 647-668. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00758.x
2.
BarberáP.BoydstunA.LinnS.McMahonR.NaglerJ. (2016, September). Methodological challenges in estimating tone: Application to news coverage of the U.S. economy. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
BastosM. T.RaimundoR. L.TravitzkiR. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 260-270. doi:10.1177/0163443712467594
5.
BennettW. L. (1997). Cracking the news code: Some rules that journalists live by. In Do the media govern?, IyengarS.ReevesR., eds., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. (pp. 103-117).
6.
BennettW. L. (2003). News, the politics of illusion. New York, NY: Longman.
7.
BennettW. L. (2004). Gatekeeping and press-government relations: A multigated model of news construction. In KaidL. L. (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 283-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781410610584.
8.
BennettW. L.IyengarS. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
9.
BergerJ.MilkmanK. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 192-205. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1528077
10.
BloodD. J.PhillipsP. C. (1995). Recession headline news, consumer sentiment, the state of the economy and presidential popularity: A time series analysis 1989-1993. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 2-22. doi:10.1093/ijpor/7.1.2
11.
BloodD. J.PhillipsP. C. (1997). Economic headline news on the agenda: New approaches to understanding causes and effects. In MccombsM.ShawD. L.WeaverD. (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
BoomgaardenH. G.Van SpanjeJ.VliegenthartR.De VreeseC. H. (2011). Covering the crisis: Media coverage of the economic crisis and citizens’ economic expectations. Acta Politica, 46, 353-379. doi:10.1057/ap.2011.18
13.
boydd. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Macarthur foundation series on digital learning—Youth, identity, and digital media volume, BuckinghamD., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (pp. 119-142).
14.
BrunsA. (2011). Gatekeeping, gatewatching, real-time feedback: New challenges for journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research Journal, 7, 117-136. doi:10.25200/BJR.v7n2.2011.355
15.
BullinghamL.VasconcelosA. C. (2013). “The presentation of self in the online world”: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39, 101-112. doi:10.1177/0165551512470051
16.
CarrollC. D. (2003). Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 269-298. doi:10.1162/00335530360535207
17.
ChaffeeS. H.MetzgerM. J. (2001). The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society, 4, 365-379. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_3
18.
ChoiY. H.BazarovaN. N. (2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple social network sites. Human Communication Research, 41, 480-500. doi:10.1111/jcom.12106
19.
DavenportS. W.BergmanS. M.BergmanJ. Z.FearringtonM. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212-220. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011
20.
De BoefS.KellstedtP. M. (2004). The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 633-649. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00092.x
21.
DomsM. E.MorinN. J. (2004). Consumer sentiment, the economy, and the news media (FRB of San Francisco Working paper). doi:10.2139/ssrn.602763
22.
DugganM.EllisonN. B.LampeC.LenhartA.MaddenM. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center.
23.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J. (2004). Do negative messages work? The impact of negativity on citizens’ evaluations of candidates. American Politics Research, 32, 570-605. doi:10.1177/1532673x03260834
24.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
25.
GlynnC.HugeM.HoffmanL. (2008). Did the media help inflate the housing bubble? Media coverage of real estate markets in times of change. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Marriott Downtown, Chicago, IL, August 2008.
26.
GoidelK.ProcopioS.TerrellD.WuH. D. (2010). Sources of economic news and economic expectations. American Politics Research, 38, 759-777. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1532673x09355671
27.
GuggenheimL.JangS. M.BaeS. Y.NeumanW. R. (2015). The dynamics of issue frame competition in traditional and social media. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 207-224. doi:10.1177/0002716215570549
28.
HallinD. C. (2000). Commercialism and professionalism in the American news media. Mass Media and Society, 3, 243-262.
29.
HartR. P. (1984). Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
30.
HollandersD.VliegenthartR. (2011). The influence of negative newspaper coverage on consumer confidence: The Dutch case. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 367-373. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1430287
31.
JangS. M.PasekJ. (2015). Assessing the carrying capacity of Twitter and online news. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 577-598. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1035397
32.
JungY.SongH.VordererP. (2012). Why do people post and read personal messages in public? The motivation of using personal blogs and its effects on users’ loneliness, belonging, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1626-1633. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.001
33.
KwonK. H.OhO.AgrawalM.RaoH. R. (2012). Audience gatekeeping in the Twitter service: An investigation of tweets about the 2009 Gaza conflict. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 212-229.
34.
LamlaM. J.LeinS. M. (2014). The role of media for consumers’ inflation expectation formation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 106, 62-77.
35.
LittE. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 330-345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
36.
LittE.HargittaiE. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media & Society, 2,. doi:10.1177/2056305116633482
37.
MartindaleC. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114-133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
MergenthalerE. (1996). Emotion-abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1306-1315. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.64.6.1306
41.
MolyneuxL. (2015). What journalists retweet: Opinion, humor, and brand development on Twitter. Journalism, 16, 920-935. doi:10.1177/1464884914550135
42.
NivenD. (2000). The other side of optimism: High expectations and the rejection of status quo politics. Political Behavior, 22, 71-88. doi:10.1023/A:1006642501693
43.
O’ConnorB.BalasubramanyanR.RoutledgeB. R.SmithN. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. ICWSM, 11, 1-2.
44.
PanekE. T.NardisY.KonrathS. (2013). Mirror or megaphone? How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2004-2012. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.012
45.
PattersonT. E. (1994). Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
46.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
PickupM. (2015). Introduction to time series analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
RogetP. M. (1911). Roget’s thesaurus of English words and phrases. USA: Thomas Y. Crowell.
50.
SchultzF.UtzS.GöritzA. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37, 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
51.
SeidmanG. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 402-407. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
52.
ShahD. V.WattsM. D.DomkeD.FanD. P.FibisonM. (1999). News coverage, economic cues, and the public’s presidential preferences, 1984-1996. The Journal of Politics, 61, 914-943. doi:10.2307/2647548
53.
ShoemakerP. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32-47. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
54.
ShoemakerP. J.VosT. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
SorokaS. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68, 372-385. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x
56.
SorokaS. N. (2012). The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the real world. Journal of Politics, 74, 514-528. doi:10.1017/s002238161100171x
57.
SorokaS. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SorokaS. N.SteculaD. A.WlezienC. (2015). It’s (change in) the (future) economy, stupid: Economic indicators, the media, and public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 457-474. doi:10.1111/ajps.12145
59.
StockingS. H.GrossP. H. (1989). How do journalists think? A proposal for the study of cognitive bias in newsmaking. Bloomington: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Smith Research Center, Indiana University.
60.
StoneP. J.DunphyD. C.SmithM. S.OgilvieD. M. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
SubasicP.HuettnerA. (2001). Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 9, 483-496. doi:10.1109/91.940962
62.
ToubiaO.StephenA. T. (2013). Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter?Marketing Science, 32, 368-392. doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0773
63.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
64.
WaltherJ. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
65.
WhissellC. M. (1989). The dictionary of affect in language. In PlutchikR.KellermanH. (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (pp. 113-131). New York, NY: Academic Press.
66.
WhiteD. M. (1950). The gate keeper: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 27, 383. doi:10.1177/107769905002700403
67.
WilliamsB. A.Delli CarpiniM. X. (2000). Unchained reaction: The collapse of media gatekeeping and the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. Journalism, 1, 61-85. doi:10.1177/146488490000100113
68.
WilliamsB. A.Delli CarpiniM. X. (2004). Monica and Bill all the time and everywhere: The collapse of gatekeeping and agenda setting in the new media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1208-1230. doi:10.1177/0002764203262344
69.
WlezienC.SorokaS.SteculaD. (in press). A cross-national analysis of the causes and consequences of economic news. Social Science Quarterly.
70.
XuW. W.FengM. (2014). Talking to the broadcasters on Twitter: Networked gatekeeping in Twitter conversations with journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 420-437. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.935853
71.
YoungL.SorokaS. (2012). Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication, 29, 205-231. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.671234
72.
ZhaoS.GrasmuckS.MartinJ. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816-1836. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
73.
ZhaoW. X.JiangJ.WengJ.HeJ.LimE.-P.YanH.LiX. (2011). Comparing Twitter and traditional media using topic models. In CloughP.et al. (Eds.), Advances in information retrieval (pp. 338-349). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_34
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
