Adolescence is a key period in the development of individuals’ news habits, but little is known about the processes involved in the process of news media socialization. This study proposes an integrated model in which the influence of family communication on motivations and behaviors of adolescents in relation to news consumption occurs through the development of personality traits related to information processing (namely, need for cognition and need to evaluate). Structural equation modeling of data from a representative survey of 2,273 adolescents, aged 13 to 17, provide support for the theorized model, such that concept-oriented communication within families is associated to news exposure indirectly, via personality traits and motivations. Thus, the study provides an initial assessment of one way children are socialized to become news enthusiasts and news avoiders. It also provides empirical evidence that information-processing traits are influenced by family communication patterns, confirming what hitherto was theoretical speculation.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
2.
AustinE. W. (1995). The importance of perspective in parent-child interpretations of family communication patterns. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 558-568. doi:10.1177/107769909307000308
3.
AustinE. W.PinkletonB. W. (2001). The role of parental mediation in the political socialization process. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 221-240. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_2
4.
BabrowA. S.SwansonD. L. (1988). Disentangling antecedents of audience exposure levels: Extending expectancy-value analyses of gratifications sought from television news. Communications Monographs, 55, 1-21. doi:10.1080/03637758809376155
5.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.111
6.
BizerG. Y.KrosnickJ. A.HolbrookA. L.WheelerS. C.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2004). The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: The effects of need to evaluate. Journal of Personality, 72, 995-1028. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00288.x
BorahP.EdgerlyS.VragaE.ShahD. (2013). Hearing and talking to the other side: Antecedents of cross-cutting exposure in adolescents. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 391-416. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.693568
9.
BoydM.ZaffJ.PhelpsE.WeinerM. W.LernerR. (2011). The relationship between adolescents’ news media use and civic engagement: The indirect effect of interpersonal communication with parents. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 1167-1179. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.004
10.
BuckinghamD. (2000). The making of citizens: Young people, news and politics. London, England: Routledge.
11.
BuckinghamD.BanajiS.CarrD.CranmerS.WillettR. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature. London, England: Ofcom.
12.
BuijzenM.Walma van der MolenJ.SondijP. (2007). Parental mediation of children’s emotional responses to a violent news event. Communication Research, 34, 212-230. doi:10.1177/0093650206298070
13.
CacioppoJ.PettyR. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
14.
CacioppoJ.PettyR.KaoC. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
15.
CarlsonL.GrossbartS.StuenkelJ. K. (1992). The role of parental socialization types on differential family communication patterns regarding consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 31-52.
16.
ChaffeeS. H.McLeodJ.WackmanD. (1973). Family communication patterns and adolescent political socialization. In DennisJ. (Ed.), Socialization to politics (pp. 349-356). New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
ChaffeeS. H.SchleuderJ. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00096.x
18.
ChristiansC. G.GlasserT.McQuailD.NordenstrengK.WhiteR. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19.
CondezaR.BachmannI.MujicaC. (2014). News consumption among Chilean adolescents: Interests, motivations and perceptions on the news agenda. Comunicar, 43, 55-64. doi:10.3916/C43-2014-05
20.
ConwayJ.RubinA. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18, 443-463. doi:10.1177/009365091018004001
21.
CorreaT. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103-124. doi:10.1111/jcom.12067
22.
Costera MeijerI. (2007). The paradox of popularity: How young people experience the news. Journalism Studies, 8, 96-116. doi:10.1080/14616700601056874
23.
DavidC. (2009). Learning political information from the news: A closer look at the role of motivation. Journal of Communication, 59, 243-261. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01414.x
24.
EvelandE. P.ShahD.KwakN. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359-386. doi:10.1177/0093650203253369
25.
FalcesC.BriñolP.SierraB.BecerraA.AlierE. (2001). Validación de la escala de necesidad de cognición y su aplicación al estudio de cambio de actitudes [Validation of the need for cognition scale and its application to the study of attitude change]. Psicothema, 20, 557-562. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=489
26.
FitzpatrickM. A.KoernerA. F. (2005). Family communication schemata: Effects on children’s resiliency. In DunwoodyS.BeckerL. B.McLeodD.KosickiG. (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod (pp. 115-139). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
27.
FujiokaY.AustinE. W. (2002). The relationship of family communication patterns to parental mediation styles. Communication Research, 29, 642-665. doi:10.1177/009365002237830
28.
García-RuizR.GozálvezV.AguadedJ. I. (2014). The media competence as a challenge for educommunication: Tools of evaluation. Cuadernos.info, 35, 15-27. doi:10.7764/cdi.35.623
29.
GivertzM.SegrinC. (2014). The association between overinvolved parenting and young adults’ self-efficacy, psychological entitlement, and family communication. Communication Research, 41, 1111-1136. doi:10.1177/0093650212456392
30.
GrabeM. E.LangA.ZhouS.BollsP. (2000). Cognitive access to negatively arousing news: An experimental investigation of the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 27, 3-26. doi:10.1177/009365000027001001
31.
GronemeyerM. E.PorathW. (2015). A study on homogeneity between editorials and news sources opinions in the Chilean reference press. Cuadernos.info, 36, 139-153. doi:10.7764/cdi.36.567
32.
HargittaiE.HsiehY. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 95-107. doi:10.1177/0894439310397146
33.
HasteH. (2004). Constructing the citizen. Political Psychology, 25, 413-439. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00378.x
34.
HivelyM. H.EvelandW. P.Jr. (2009). Contextual antecedents and political consequences of adolescent political discussion, discussion elaboration, and network diversity. Political Communication, 26, 30-47. doi:10.1080/10584600802622837
35.
HobbsR. (2011). The state of media literacy: A response to Potter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 419-430. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.597594
36.
HolbertR. L.StephensonM. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x
37.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=183
38.
HorcajoJ.DíazD.BriñolP.GandarillasB. (2008). Necesidad de evaluación: Propuesta para su medición en castellano [Need to evaluate: A proposal for its measurement in Spanish]. Psicothema, 20, 557-562. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=3585
39.
HuangE. (2009). The causes of youths’ low news consumption and strategies for making youth happy news consumers. Convergence, 15, 105-122. doi:10.1177/1354856508097021
40.
HuangL.-N. (1999). Family communication patterns and personality characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 47, 230-243. doi:10.1080/01463379909370136
41.
JarvisW. B.PettyR. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172
42.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71, 782-799. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090719
43.
KatzE.GurevitchM.HaasH. (1974). On the uses of mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094393
44.
LedbetterA. M.SchrodtP. (2008). Family communication patterns and cognitive processing: Conversation and conformity orientations as predictors of informational reception apprehension. Communication Studies, 59, 388-401. doi:10.1080/10510970802467429
45.
LeeA. (2013). News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 300-317. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.816712
46.
LeeN.ShahD.McLeodJ. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40, 669-697. doi:10.1177/0093650212436712
47.
LevyM. R.WindahlS. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 51-78. doi:10.1177/009365084011001003
48.
LullJ. (1980). Family communication patterns and the social uses of television. Communication Research, 7, 319-334. doi:10.1177/009365028000700303
49.
MaioG. R.EssesV. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69, 583-615. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.694156
50.
MarchiR. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity.”Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36, 246-262. doi:10.1177/0196859912458700
51.
McDevittM. (2005). The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 67-88. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh079
52.
McDevittM.ChaffeeS. (2000). Closing gaps in political communication and knowledge: Effects of a school intervention. Communication Research, 27, 259-292. doi:10.1177/009365000027003001
53.
McDevittM.ChaffeeS. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19, 281-301. doi:10.1080/01957470290055501
McLeodJ.ChaffeeS. (1972). The social construction of reality. In TedeschiJ. (Ed.), The social influence processes (pp. 50-99). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
56.
MeadowcroftJ. (1986). The impact of family communication patterns on political development: The child’s role. Communication Research, 13, 603-624. doi:10.1177/009365086013004005
57.
PalmgreenP.WennerL.RayburnJ. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7, 161-192. doi:10.1177/009365028000700202
58.
PapathanassopoulosS.CoenS.CurranJ.AalbergT.RoweD.JonesP.. . . TiffenR. (2013). Online threat, but television is still dominant. Journalism Practice, 7, 690-704. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.761324
59.
PasekJ.KenksiK.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2006). America’s youth and community engagement: How use of mass media is related to civic engagement and political awareness in 14-to-22-year-olds. Communication Research, 33, 115-135. doi:10.1177/0093650206287073
60.
PingreeS.HawkinsR. P.BottaR. A. (2000). The effect of family communication patterns on young people’s science literacy. Science Communication, 22, 115-132.
61.
PoindexterP. M.McCombsM. E. (2001). Revisiting the civic duty to keep informed in the new media environment. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 113-126. doi:10.1177/107769900107800108
62.
PorterW. J. (2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 675-696. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.521462
63.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
RitchieD. L.FitzpatrickM. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523-544. doi:10.1177/009365090017004007
65.
RuggieroT. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3-37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
66.
SaphirM. N.ChaffeeS. (2002). Adolescents’ contributions to family communication patterns. Human Communication Research, 28, 86-108. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00799.x
67.
SchermanA.ArriagadaA.ValenzuelaS. (2015). Student and environmental protests in Chile: The role of social media. Politics, 35, 151-171. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12072
68.
SchrodtP.WittP.MessersmithA. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75, 248-269. doi:10.1080/03637750802256318
69.
ShahD.McLeodJ.LeeN. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26, 102-117. doi:10.1080/10584600802710384
70.
SorokaS.AndrewB.AalbergT.IyengarS.CurranJ.CoenS.. . . TiffenR. (2013). Auntie knows best? Public broadcasters and current affairs knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 719-739. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000555.
71.
ThompsonM.PingreeS.HawkinsR. P.DravesC. (1991). Long-term norms and cognitive structures as shapers of television viewer activity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 319-334. doi:10.1080/08838159109364128
72.
TianY. (2011). Communication behaviors as mediators: Examining links between political orientation, political communication, and political participation. Communication Quarterly, 59, 380-394. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.583503
73.
TimsA. (1986). Family political communication and social values. Communication Research, 13, 5-17. doi:10.1177/009365028601300102
74.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7, 251-271. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2
75.
ValenzuelaS. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920-942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375
76.
ValenzuelaS.ArriagadaA.SchermanA. (2014). Facebook, Twitter and youth engagement: A quasi-experimental study of social media use and protest behavior using propensity score matching. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2046-2070. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2022/1189
77.
ValkenburgP. M.KrcmarM.PeetersA. L.MarseilleN. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52-66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474
78.
YorkC.SchollR. M. (2015). Youth antecedents to news media consumption: Parent and youth newspaper use, news discussion, and long-term news behavior. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 681-699. doi:10.1177/1077699015588191
