The Outcomes of Broadcasting Self-Disclosure Using New Communication Technologies: Responses to Disclosure Vary Across One’s Social Network

Abstract

Several new communication technologies have made it relatively easy for individuals to broadcast a single self-disclosure directly to almost everyone with whom they share a relationship—ranging from close friends to little-known acquaintances. Drawing from research on self-disclosure and the negativity effect, two studies were conducted to test the notion that the interpersonal and relational outcomes of broadcasting positive and negative self-disclosures are not uniform. The results of the cross-sectional survey offer evidence that the outcomes of positive and negative broadcasted disclosures vary depending on the receiver’s relationship with the discloser. The results from the experiment largely support the negativity effect explanation for differences in the outcomes of broadcasted disclosures. Relative to positive disclosures, negative broadcasted self-disclosures have a significantly greater impact on acquaintances than on friends’ perceptions of the discloser and their relationship.

Keywords

communication technology self-disclosure negativity effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, England: Sage.

Altman

Taylor

(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bazarova

N. N.

(2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62, 815-832. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x

Bazarova

N. N.

Choi

Y. H.

(2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to self-disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64, 635-657. doi:10.111/jcom.12106

Bazarova

N. N.

Taft

J. G.

Choi

Y. H.

Cosley

(2012). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 121-141. doi:10.1177/0261927X12456384

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057

Boneva

Kraut

(2002). Email, gender, and personal relationships. In Wellman

Haythornthwaite

(Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 372-403). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980

Caltabiano

M. L.

Smithson

(1983). Variables affecting the perception of self-disclosure appropriateness. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 119-128. doi:10.1080/00224545.1983.9712017

10.

Cayanus

J. L.

Martin

M. M.

(2008). Teacher self-disclosure: Amount, relevance, and negativity. Communication Quarterly, 56, 325-341. doi:10.1080/01463370802241492

11.

Choi

Y. H.

Bazarova

N. N.

(2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple social network sites. Human Communication Research, 41, 480-500. doi:10.1111/hcre.12053

12.

Collins

N. L.

Miller

L. C.

(1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457

13.

Cozby

P. C.

(1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73-91. doi:10.1037/h0033950

14.

Derlega

V. J.

Metts

Petronio

Margulis

S. T.

(1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

15.

Dickson-Markman

(1986). Self disclosure with friends across the life cycle. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 259-264. doi:10.1177/0265407586032009

16.

Dindia

(1997). Self-disclosure and self and relationship identity: A transactional/dialectical perspective. In Duck

(Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 411-426). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

17.

Dindia

(2001). Self-disclosure research: Knowledge through meta-analysis. In Allen

Preiss

R. W.

Gayle

B. M.

Burrell

(Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 169-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Dindia

Allen

(1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106

19.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. doi:1143-1168.10.1111/j.1083–6101.2007.00367.x

20.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873-892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389

21.

Fiske

S. T.

(1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-908. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889

22.

Gilbert

S. J.

Horenstein

N. P.

(1975). The communication of self-disclosure: Level versus valence. Human Communication Research, 1, 316-322. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00280.x

23.

Gilbert

S. J.

Whiteneck

G. G.

(1976). Toward a multidimensional approach to the study of self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 347-355. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00495.x

24.

Greene

Derlega

V. J.

Mathews

(2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In Vangelisti

Perlman

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409-427). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Hampton

Goulet

L. S.

Rainie

Purcell

(2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org

26.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

27.

Hecht

Shepherd

Hall

M. J.

(1979). Multivariate indices of the effects of self-disclosure. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 43, 235-245. doi:10.1080/10570317909373975

28.

Hendrick

S. S.

(1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93-98. doi:10.2307/352430

29.

Jang

C. Y.

Stefanone

M. A.

(2011). Non-directed self-disclosure in the blogosphere: Exploring the persistence of interpersonal communication norms. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 1039-1059. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.559265

30.

Jones

E. E.

Archer

R. L.

(1976). Are there special effects of personalistic self-disclosure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 180-193. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(76)90069-X

31.

Jourard

S. M.

(1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York, NY: John Wiley.

32.

Kellermann

(1984). The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction. Communication Monographs, 51, 37-55. doi:10.1080/03637758409390182

33.

Kellermann

(1989). The negativity effect in interaction: It’s all in your point of view. Human Communication Research, 16, 147-183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00208.x

34.

Kim

Dindia

(2011). Online self-disclosure: A review of research. In Wright

K. B.

Webb

L. M.

(Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 156-180). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

35.

Lannutti

P. J.

Strauman

E. C.

(2006). Classroom communication: The influence of instructor self-disclosure on student evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 54, 89-99. doi:10.1080/01463370500270496

36.

Lazowski

L. E.

Andersen

S. M.

(1990). Self-disclosure and social perception: The impact of private, negative, and extreme communication. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 131-154.

37.

Martin

M. M.

Anderson

C. M.

Mottet

T. P.

(1999). Perceived understanding and self-disclosure in the stepparent-stepchild relationship. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 133, 281-290. doi:10.1080/00223989909599741

38.

Meeks

B. S.

Hendrick

S. S.

Hendrick

(1998). Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137-142. doi:10.1177/0265407598156003

39.

Miller

L. C.

Cooke

L. L.

Tsang

Morgan

(1992). Should I brag? Nature and impact of positive and boastful disclosures for women and men. Human Communication Research, 18, 364-399. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00557.x

40.

Park

Jin

S. A.

(2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1974-1983. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004

41.

Petronio

(2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York Press.

42.

Rubin

(1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273. doi:10.1037/h0029841

43.

Sherbourne

C. D.

Stewart

A. L.

(1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 705-714. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B

44.

Smith

(2014). 6 new facts about Facebook. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org

45.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

46.

Tardy

C. H.

Hosman

L. A.

Bradac

J. J.

(1981). Disclosing self to friends and family: A reexamination of initial questions. Communication Quarterly, 29, 263-268. doi:10.1080/01463378109369414

47.

Taylor

D. A.

Belgrave

F. Z.

(1986). The effects of perceived intimacy and valence on self-disclosure reciprocity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 247-255. doi:10.1177/0146167286122011

48.

Tolstedt

B. E.

Stokes

J. P.

(1984). Self-disclosure, intimacy, and the depenetration process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 84-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.84

49.

Utz

(2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076

50.

Valenzuela

Park

Kee

K. F.

(2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x

51.

Vitak

(2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network websites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 451-470. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140

52.

Walton

S. C.

Rice

R. E.

(2013). Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1465-1474. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.033