This article tests a resolution of the difficulties in specifying how goals and situations relate to one another. The new theory suggests a distinction among situational features. “Reasonably apparent” features are those that are fairly obvious at the start of an interaction. “Subjective” features are emergent and depend on a participant’s experience of the interaction. The proposed theory is that reasonably apparent situation features cause primary goals, which cause subjective situational characteristics, which in turn activate secondary goals. In Study 1 (n = 461), results of analysis of open-ended situational descriptions were consistent with this new theory. The difficulties in testing complex causal relations with categorical data led to Study 2 (n = 1,435), which also supported the new theory.
ArgyleM.FurnhamA.GrahamJ. A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261-304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
4.
ClarkR. A.DeliaJ. G. (1979). TOPOI and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187-206. doi:10.1080/00335637909383470
5.
CodyM. J.McLaughlinM. L. (1985). The situation as a construct in interpersonal communication research. In KnappM. L.MillerG. R. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 263-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
DillardJ. P. (1990a). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In DillardJ. P. (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
7.
DillardJ. P. (1990b). The nature and substance of goals in tactical communication. In CodyM. J.McLaughlinM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 70-91). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
8.
DillardJ. P.SegrinC.HardenJ. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38. doi:10.1080/03637758909390247
9.
DillardJ. P.SolomonD. H. (2000). Conceptualizing context in message-production research. Communication Theory, 10, 167-175. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00186.x
10.
GreeneJ. O. (1997). A second generation action assembly theory. In GreeneJ. O. (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
HampleD.DallingerJ. M. (1998). On the etiology of the rebuff phenomenon: Why are persuasive messages less polite after rebuffs?Communication Studies, 49, 305-321. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368541
12.
KellermannK. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300. doi:10.1080/03637759209376270
13.
KelleyH. H.HolmesJ. G.KerrN. L.ReisH. T.RusbultC. E.van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
KnokeD.BurkeP. J. (1980). Log-linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
KoehlerK. J.LarntzK. (1980). An empirical investigation of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 336-344. doi:10.1080/01621459.1980.10477473
16.
LewinK. (1952). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock.
17.
MenardS. (2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
MeyerJ. R. (1997). Cognitive influences on the ability to address interaction goals. In GreeneJ. O. (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 71-90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
MeyerJ. R. (2002). Contextual influences on the pursuit of secondary goals in request messages. Communication Monographs, 69, 189-203. doi:10.1080/03637750216539
20.
MillerL. C.CodyM. J.McLaughlinM. L. (1994). Situations and goals as fundamental constructs in interpersonal communication research. In KnappM. L.MillerG. R. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 162-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
WilsonS. R. (1990). Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57, 81-103. doi:10.1080/03637759009376188
22.
WilsonS. R. (1995). Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differences in goal formation. Communication Yearbook, 18, 3-25.
23.
WilsonS. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
