Prior research has examined various correlates of media trust including media consumers’ political stands and media use, objectivity in news reports, and perceived biases stemming from journalists’ political leanings. The goal of this study is to examine community contextual sources of media trust. Data from the Japanese General Social Surveys indicate that prefecture-level structural pluralism and political heterogeneity are negatively associated with measures of media trust, independent of personal characteristics of respondents. Implications are discussed in terms of the production of media messages.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in the age of choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
3.
CappellaJ. N. (2002). Cynicism and social trust in the new media environment. Journal of Communication, 52, 229–241.
4.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
D’AlessioD.AllenM. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50, 133-156.
6.
DaltonR. J.BeckP. A.HuckfeldtR. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92, 111-126.
7.
DemersD. P. (1996). The menace of the corporate newspaper: Fact or fiction. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
8.
DennisE. E. (1997). How “liberal” are the media anyway? The continual conflict of professionalism and partisanship. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 115-119.
9.
DomkeD.FanD. P.FibisonM.ShahD. V.SmithS. S.WattsM. D. (1997). News media, candidates and issues, and public opinion in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 718-737.
10.
DonohueG. A.TichenorP. J.OlienC. N. (1973). Mass media functions, knowledge and social control. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 652-659.
11.
DonohueG. A.TichenorP. J.OlienC. N. (1995). A guard dog perspective on the role of media. Journal of Communication, 45, 115-132.
12.
DuncanG. J.RaudenbushS. W. (1999). Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist, 34, 29-41.
13.
EvelandW. P.Jr.ShahD. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101-117.
14.
FarnsworthS. J.LichterS. R. (2011). Network television’s coverage of the 2008 presidential election. American Behavior Scientist, 55, 354-370.
15.
FicoF.KuL.SoffinS. (1994). Fairness, balance of newspaper coverage of U.S. in Gulf War. Newspaper Research Journal, 15, 30-43.
16.
FicoF.SoffinS. (1995). Fairness and balance of selected newspaper coverage of controversial national, state, and local issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 621-633.
17.
FischerC. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1319-1341.
18.
FischerC. S. (1981). The public and private worlds of city life. American Sociological Review, 46, 306-316.
19.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York, NY: Vintage.
20.
GansH. J. (1985, November-December). Are U.S. journalists dangerously liberal?Columbia Journalism Review, 24, 29-34.
21.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
GlynnC. J.HugeM. E. (2014). How pervasive are perceptions of bias? Exploring judgments of media bias in financial news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 543-553. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu004
23.
GoldbergB. (2001). Bias: A CBS insider exposes how the media distorts the news. Washington, DC: Regnery.
24.
GoldmanS. K.MutzD. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A corss-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28, 42-66.
25.
GrosecloseT.MilyoJ. (2005). A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1191-1237.
26.
GullifordM. C.UkoumunneO. C.ChinnS. (1999). Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: Data from the Health Survey for England 1994. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 876-883.
27.
GuntherA. C. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279-287.
28.
GuntherA. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public?Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167.
29.
GuntherA. C.SchmittK. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55-70.
30.
HagiwaraS.FukudaM.YokoyamaS. E. G.KawabataM.SaitoS. (2000). 1999 nen Tōkyō tochijisen houdou no bunseki: Terebi houdou no tokushitsu wo saguru [Media coverage of the 1999 election of Tokyo’s governor: What are the characteristics of TV reports?]. Keio Communication Review, 50, 3-21.
31.
HallinD. C. (1986). The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
HindmanD. B. (1996). Community newspapers, community structural pluralism, and local conflict with nonlocal groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 708-721.
33.
HindmanD. B.ErnstS.RichardsonM. (2001). The rural-urban gap in community newspaper editors’ use of information technologies. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 149-164.
34.
HindmanD. B.LittlefieldR.PrestonA.NeumannD. (1999). Structural pluralism, ethnic pluralism, and community newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 250-263.
35.
HindmanD. B.YamamotoM. (2011). Social capital in a community context: A multilevel analysis of individual- and community-level predictors of social trust. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 838-856.
36.
HoffmanL. H. (2012). When the world outside gets inside your head: The effects of media context on perceptions of public opinion. Communication Research, 40, 463-485.
37.
HoffnerC.RehkoffR. A. (2011). Young voters’ responses to the 2004 U.S. presidential election: Social identity, perceived media influence, and behavior outcomes. Journal of Communication, 61, 732-757.
38.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
39.
IkedaK.BoaseJ. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38, 660-683.
40.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.
Japan Newspaper Publishers & Editors Association. (2002, April). 2001 nen zenkoku media sessyoku hyôka tyôsa houkokusyo [2001 national media contact evaluation survey report]. Retrieved from http://www.pressnet.or.jp/adarc/data/research/pdf/2001.pdf
43.
Japan Newspaper Publishers & Editors Association. (2010, June). 2009 nen zenkoku media sessyoku hyôka tyôsa houkokusyo [2009 national media contact evaluation survey report]. Retrieved from http://www.pressnet.or.jp/adarc/data/research/pdf/2009.pdf
44.
JeffresL.HorowitzE.BrackenC. C.JianG.NeuendorfK. A.YoonS. (2012). Structural pluralism and the community context: How and when does the environment matter?Mass Communication & Society, 14, 787-815.
45.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (1998). Cruising in believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
46.
KiousisS. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 381-403.
47.
KirchhoffS. M. (2011). The U.S. newspaper industry in transition. Journal of Current Issues in Media and Telecommunications, 2, 27-51.
48.
KlapperJ. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Glencoe, UK: Free Press.
49.
KohringM.MatthesJ. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34, 231-252.
50.
KraussE. S. (2000). Broadcasting politics in Japan: NHK and television news. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
KraussE. S.LambertP. (2002). The press and reform in Japan. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 57-78.
KwakN.WilliamsA.WangX.LeeH. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32, 87-111.
54.
LarsonS. G. (2006). Media and minorities: The politics of race in news and entertainment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
55.
LeeT.-T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing media bias perception. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 43-64.
56.
LeeT.-T. (2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 8-21.
57.
LichterR.RothmanS.LichterL. S. (1986). The media elite. Bethesda, MD: Adler & Adler.
58.
LowreyW.GowerK.EvansW.MackayJ. (2006). Assessing newspaper preparedness for public health emergencies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 362-380.
59.
LowryD. T. (2008). Network TV news framing of good vs. bad economic news under Democrat and Republican presidents: A lexical analysis of political bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 483-498.
60.
MargolisM.ResnickD.LevyJ. (2003). Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle: US elections and the Internet. In GibsonR.NixonP.WardS. (Eds.), Net gain? Political parties and the impact of new information communication technologies (pp. 53-69). London, England: Routledge.
61.
McCombsM. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
62.
McLeodD. M.HertogJ. K. (1999). Social control, social change and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In DemersD.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp. 305-330). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
63.
McLeodJ.SotirovicM.HolbertR. L. (1998). Values as sociotropic judgments influencing communications patterns. Communication Research, 25, 453-485.
64.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
65.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2014). Heisei nijyû rokunen do gakkô kihon tyôsa (sokuhô chi) no kouhyô ni tsuite [For publication of 2014 fiscal year School Basic Survey (preliminary) ]. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/26/08/attach/1350731.htm
66.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (n.d.-a). Keizai seichô ritsu oyobi hitori atari kenmin syotoku [Rate of economic growth and per capita prefectural income]. Retrived from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/03.htm
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (n.d.-c). Todôfuken betsu jinkô [Prefecture population]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/02.htm
MoyP.GastilJ. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23, 443-460.
72.
MutzD. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855.
73.
NahS.ArmstrongC. L. (2011). Structural pluralism in journalism and media studies: A concept explication and theory construction. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 857-878.
74.
NisbetE. C.StoycheffE. (2013). Let the people speak: A multilevel model of supply and demand for press freedom. Communication Research, 24, 720-741.
75.
NivenD. (2002). Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.
76.
PaekH.-J.YoonS.-H.ShahD. V. (2005). Local news, social integration, and community participation: Hierarchical linear modeling of contextual and cross-level effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 587-606.
77.
PattersonT. E.DonsbachW. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13, 455-468.
78.
PerloffR. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
79.
PeughJ. L.EndersC. K. (2005). Using the SPSS Mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 717-741.
PriceV.CappellaJ. N.NirL. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion?Political Communication, 19, 95-112.
83.
PrielerM.KohlbacherF.HagiwaraS.ArimaA. (2009). How older people are represented in Japanese TV commercials: A content analysis. Keio Communication Review, 31, 5-21.
84.
SaitoS. (2007). Television and the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan: Does television contribute to the maintenance of the status quo?Journal of Communication, 57, 511-531.
85.
SampsonR. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53, 766-779.
86.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
87.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1998). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In KarpD. R. (Ed.), Community justice: An emergent field (pp. 97-118). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
88.
SawardM. (1994). Democratic theory and indices of democratization. In BeethamD. (Ed.), Defining and measuring democracy (pp. 6-24). London, England: Sage.
89.
ScheufeleD. A.HardyB. W.BrossardD.Waismel-ManorI. S.NisbetE. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728-753.
90.
ScheufeleD. A.NisbetM. C.BrossardD.NisbetE. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and interpersonal variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338.
91.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
92.
SmithG. R. (2010). Politicians and the news media: How elite attacks influence perceptions of media bias. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 15, 319-343.
93.
StroudN. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341-366.
94.
TichenorP. J.DonohueG. A.OlienC. N. (1980). Community conflict & the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
95.
TittleC. R. (1989). Influences on urbanism: A test of predictions from three perspectives. Social Problems, 36, 270-288.
96.
TsfatiY.ArielyG. (2013). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41, 760-782.
97.
TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust?Communication Research, 30, 504-529.
98.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
99.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-588.
100.
ViswanathK.DemersD. (1999). Mass media from a macrosocial perspective. In DemersD.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp. 3-28). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
101.
WeaverD. H.BeamR. A.BrownleeJ. B.VoakesP. S.WilhoitG. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102.
WilliamsA. E. (2012). Trust or bust? Questioning the relationship between media trust and news attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 116-131.
103.
WilsonT. C. (1986). Community population size and social heterogeneity: An empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1154-1169.
104.
WirthL. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1-24.
105.
ZiemkeD. A. (1980). Selective exposure in a presidential campaign contingent on certainty, salience. In NimmoD. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 4, pp. 497-511). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
