Two fundamental dimensions underlie person perception: warmth and competence. We conducted three experiments to investigate how a positive or negative emphasis of only one of these dimensions (i.e., of only warmth or only competence) affects the perception of the other (complementary) dimension, and how voting intentions are influenced by these emphases. The results show that when a politician is described positively in only one of the two dimensions, people assess the complementary dimension more negatively. In addition, the negative emphasis of only one of the two dimensions also leads to a more negative assessment of the complementary dimension. Furthermore, we explore how these one-dimensional person descriptions affect the assessment of the speakers uttering them. Politicians who describe their opponents in negative terms are also evaluated negatively. On the contrary, politicians who judge others in positive terms are not necessarily evaluated positively.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
2.
AndersonC. J.BrettschneiderF. (2003). The likeable winner versus the competent loser. Candidate images and the German Election of 2002. German Politics and Society, 66, 95-118. doi:10.3167/104503003782353538
3.
ArceneauxK.NickersonD. W. (2005, September). Two field experiments testing negative campaign tactics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
4.
AschS. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290. doi:10.1037/h0055756
5.
BartelsL. M. (2002). The impact of candidate traits in American presidential elections. In KingA. (Ed.), Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections (pp. 44-70). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BasilM.SchoolerC.ReevesB. (1991). Positive and negative political advertising: Effectiveness of ads and perceptions of candidates. In BioccaF. (Ed.), Television and political advertising (pp. 245-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BauerN. M. (2013). Rethinking stereotype reliance. Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes. Politics and the Life Sciences, 32, 22-42. doi:10.2990/32_1_22
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
9.
BergsiekerH. B.LeslieL. M.ConstantineV. S.FiskeS. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1214-1238. doi:10.1037/a0027717
10.
BraderT. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
11.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In GoodyE. N. (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (2011). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BruckmüllerS.AbeleA. E. (2013). The density of the Big Two: How are agency and communion structurally represented?Social Psychology, 44, 63-74. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000145
14.
BurgoonM.CohenM.MillerM. D.MontgomeryC. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27-39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x
15.
BurgoonM.DillardJ. P.DoranN. E. (1983). Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Human Communication Research, 10, 283-294. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00018.x
16.
BurgoonM.JonesS. B.StewartD. (1975). Toward a message-centered theory of persuasion: Three empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research, 1, 240-256. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00271.x
17.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ConsiglioC.PicconiL.ZimbardoP. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 849-856. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.849
18.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ZimbardoP. G. (2002). When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perceptions of politicians’ personality. Political Psychology, 23, 77-95. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00271
19.
CapraraG. V.ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59, 581-594. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581
20.
CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J. (2005). Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 884-898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.884
21.
CarraroL.CastelliL. (2010). The implicit and explicit effects of negative political campaigns: Is the source really blamed?Political Psychology, 31, 617-645. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00771.x
22.
CrawfordM. T.SkowronskiJ. J.StiffC.LeonardsU. (2008). Seeing, but not thinking: Limiting the spread of spontaneous trait transference II. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 840-847. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.08.001
23.
DunawayJ.LawrenceR. G.RoseM.WeberC. R. (2013). Traits versus issues: How female candidates shape coverage of senate and gubernatorial races. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 715-726. doi:10.1177/1065912913491464
24.
FernandesJ. (2013). Effects of negative political advertising and message repetition on candidate evaluation. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 268-291. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.672615
25.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
26.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
27.
FleitasD. W. (1971). Bandwagon and underdog effects in minimal-information elections. The American Political Science Review, 65, 434-438. doi:10.2307/1954459
28.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J. (2011). The role of candidate traits in campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 73, 61-73. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000861
29.
FunkC. L. (1996). Understanding trait inferences in candidate images. In Delli CarpiniM. X.HuddyL.ShapiroR. Y. (Eds.), Research in micropolitics: New Directions in political psychology (pp. 97-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30.
FunkC. L. (1997). Implications of political expertise in candidate trait evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 675-697. doi:10.2307/448922
31.
FurrM. R. (2004). Interpreting effect sizes in contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 1-25. doi:10.1207/s15328031us0301_1
32.
GriceP. (1991). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HaddockG.ZannaM. P. (1997). Impact of negative advertising on evaluations of political candidates: The 1993 Canadian federal election. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 204-223. doi:10.1207/15324839751037066
34.
HillR. P. (1989). An exploration of voter responses to political advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 18, 14-22. doi:10.1080/00913367.1989.10673163
35.
HoloienD. S.FiskeS. T. (2013). Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.001
36.
JaspersonA. E.FanD. P. (2002). An aggregate examination of the backlash effect in political advertising: The case of the 1996 U.S. Senate race in Minnesota. Journal of Advertising, 31, 1-12. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673656
37.
JenkinsM.DragojevicM. (2013). Explaining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory-based approach. Communication Research, 40, 559-590. doi:10.1177/0093650211420136
38.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
39.
KahnK. F. (1993). Incumbency and the news media in U.S. Senate elections: An experimental investigation. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 715-740. doi:10.2307/448927
40.
KaidL. L. (1997). Effects of the television spots on images of Dole and Clinton. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1085-1094. doi:10.1177/0002764297040008009
41.
KervynN.BergsiekerH. B.FiskeS. T. (2012). The innuendo effect: Hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 77-85. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.001
42.
KervynN.YzerbytV.JuddC. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155-187. doi:10.1080/13546805.2010.517997
43.
LauR.R.SigelmanL.HeldmanC.BabbittP. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review, 93, 851-875. doi:10.2307/2586117
44.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69, 1176-1209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
45.
MaeL.CarlstonD. E. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: When prejudiced remarks are recognized and backfire on speakers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 240-255. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.011
46.
MaeL.CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J. (1999). Spontaneous trait transference to familiar communicators: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 233-246. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.233
47.
McDermottM. L. (2005). Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. The Journal of Politics, 67, 201-219. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00314.x
48.
MillerW. E.ShanksJ. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
MondakJ. J. (1995). Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. The Journal of Politics, 57, 1043-1069. doi:10.2307/2960401
50.
NaiA. (2013). What really matters is which camp goes dirty: Differential effects of negative campaigning on turnout during Swiss federal ballots. European Journal of Political Research, 52, 44-70. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02060.x
51.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250-256. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.4.250
52.
PaulhusD. L.TrapnellP. D. (2008). Self-presentation of personality: An agency-communion framework. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 492-517). New York, NY: Guilford.
53.
PinkletonB. E. (1998). Effects of print comparative political advertising on political decision-making and participation. Journal of Communication, 48, 24-36. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02768.x
54.
RosenbergS.NelsonC.VivekananthanP. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294. doi:10.1037/h0026086
55.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L.RubinD. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR-0504_2
57.
SidesJ. (2006, August). Swing your partner: The importance of interactions in campaigns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA .
58.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E.MaeL.CrawfordM. T. (1998). Spontaneous trait transference: Communicators take on the qualities they describe in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 837-848. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.837
59.
SonnerB. S. (1998). The effectiveness of negative political advertising: A case study. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 37-42.
60.
SpeaksJ. (2008). Conversational implicature, thought, and communication. Mind & Language, 23, 107-122. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00331.x
61.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29. doi:10.1037/h0071663
62.
WellsB. M.SkowronskiJ. J.CrawfordM. T.SchererC. R.CarlstonD. E. (2011). Inference making and linking both require thinking: Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference both rely on working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1116-1126. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.013
63.
WestD. (2004). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns 1952–2004. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
64.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263. doi:10.1177/01461672982412001
