There is growing evidence that self-affirmation can reduce defensive processing of threatening health messages among high risk individuals. However, how self-affirmation might influence low risk individuals is less clear. This study examined the effect of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ reactions to graphic on-pack warning labels. Results showed a relatively consistent pattern of interaction wherein self-affirmation decreased favorable reactions to the warning labels among occasional smokers, whereas its effect on daily smokers was mostly nonsignificant. Potential explanations of these findings are offered and their practical implications are discussed.
ArmitageC. J.HarrisP. R.ArdenM. A. (2011). Evidence that self-affirmation reduces alcohol consumption: Randomized exploratory trial with a new, brief means of self-affirming. Health Psychology, 30, 633-641.
2.
ArmitageC. J.HarrisP. R.HeptonG.NapperL. (2008). Self-affirmation increases acceptance of health-risk information among UK adult smokers with low socioeconomic status. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 88-95.
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1998). The self. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680-740). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BurnkrantR. E.HowardD. J. (1984). Effects of the use of introductory rhetorical questions versus statements on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1218-1230.
5.
CacioppoJ. T.GardnerW. L.BerntsonG. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
6.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In MerluzziT. V.GlassC. R.GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive Assessment (pp. 309-392). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
8.
CohenG. L.AronsonJ.SteeleC. M. (2000). When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1151-1164.
9.
CrockerJ.NiiyaY.MischkowskiD. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive, other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19, 740-747.
10.
DillardA. J.McCaulK. D.MagnanR. E. (2005). Why is such a smart person like you smoking? Using self-affirmation to reduce defensiveness to cigarette warning labels. Journal of Biobehavioral Research, 10, 165-182.
11.
DillardJ. P.PeckE. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68.
12.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. J. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168.
13.
EvansN. J.GilpinE.PierceJ. P.BurnsD. M.BorlandR.JohnsonM. J.BalD. (1992). Occasional smoking among adults: Evidence from the California Tobacco Survey. Tobacco Control, 1, 169-175.
14.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
15.
FischerP. M.KrugmanD. M.FletcherJ. E.FoxR. J.RojasT. H. (1993). An evaluation of health warnings in cigarette advertisements using standard market research methods: What does it mean to warn?Tobacco Control, 2, 279-285.
16.
FongG. T.HammondD.HitchmanS. C. (2009). The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 640-643.
17.
GriffinD. W.HarrisP. R. (2011). Calibrating the response to health warnings: Limiting both overreaction and underreaction with self-affirmation. Psychological Science, 22, 272-278.
18.
GreenwaldA. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In GreenwaldA. G.BrockT. C.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
HammondD.FongG. T.McDonaldP. W.BrownS.CameronR. (2004). Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: Evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1442-1445.
20.
HarrisP. R.EptonT. (2009). The impact of self-affirmation on health cognition, health behaviour and other health-related responses: A narrative review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 962-978.
21.
HarrisP. R.EptonT. (2010). The impact of self-affirmation on health-related cognition and health behavior: Issues and prospects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 439-454.
22.
HarrisP. R.MayleK.MabbottL.NapperL. (2007). Self-affirmation reduces smokers’ defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. Health Psychology, 26, 437-446.
23.
HarrisP. R.NapperL. (2005). Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1250-1263.
24.
HylandA.RezaishirazH.BauerJ.GiovinoG. A.CummingsK. M. (2005). Characteristics of low-level smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 461-468.
25.
JanisI. L.FeshbachS. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78-92. doi:10.1037/h0060732
26.
JemmottJ. B.DittoP. H.CroyleR. T. (1986). Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 899-905.
27.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361-372.
28.
KrepsG. L.VillagranM. M.ZhaoX.McHorneyC.LedfordC.WeathersM. (2011). Developing and implementing pharmacy-based communication interventions to promote medication adherence for consumers with chronic health problems. Patient Education and Counseling, 83, 375-381.
29.
KrugmanD. M.FoxR. J.FletcherJ. E.RojasT. H. (1994). Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye tracking approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(6), 39-52.
30.
KundaZ. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647.
31.
LeventhalH. (1965). Fear communications in the acceptance of preventive health practices. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 41, 1144-1168.
32.
LevinsonA. H.CampoS.GascoigneJ.JollyO.ZakharyanA.TranZ. V. (2007). Smoking, but not smokers: Identity among college students who smoke cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9, 845-852.
33.
LibermanA.ChaikenS. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
34.
LindstromM. (2001). Intermittent and daily smokers: Two different socioeconomic patterns, and diverging influence of social participation. Tobacco Control, 10, 258-266.
35.
MartensD. (2002). Graphic tobacco warnings having desired effect. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 11, 1453.
36.
McGuireW. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 233-346). New York, NY: Random House.
37.
McQueenA.KleinW. M. P. (2006). Experimental manipulation of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5, 289-354.
38.
NanX.ZhaoX. (2012). When does self-affirmation reduce negative responses to antismoking messages?Communication Studies, 63, 482-497.
39.
PetersE.RomerD.SlovicP.JamiesonK. H.WharfieldL.MertzC. K.CarpenterS. M. (2007). The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9, 473-481.
40.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
41.
RhodesN.WoodW. (1992). Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156-171.
42.
RogersR. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93-114.
43.
RuiterR. A. C.AbrahamC.KokG. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613-630.
44.
ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 119-123.
45.
ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 183-242.
46.
ShermanD. K.HartsonK. A. (2011). Reconciling self-protection with self-improvement: Self-affirmation theory. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp.128-151). New York, NY: Guilford.
47.
ShermanD. K.NelsonL. D.SteeleC. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1046-1058.
48.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 261-302). New York, NY: Academic Press.
49.
SteeleC. M.LiuT. J. (1981). Making the dissonance act unreflective of the self: Dissonance avoidance and the expectancy of a value-affirming response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 393-387.
50.
SteeleC. M.LiuT. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 45, 5-19.
51.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.LynchM. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.
52.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
53.
TesserA. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290-299.
54.
Van KoningsbruggenG. M.DasE. (2009). Don’t derogate this message! Self-affirmation promotes online type 2 diabetes risk test taking. Psychology and Health, 24, 635-649.
55.
WatsonD.TellegenA. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
56.
WegenerD. T.DowningJ.KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4., pp. 455-487). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
WitteK. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349.
58.
WitteK. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113-134.
59.
ZhaoX.NanX. (2010). Influence of self-affirmation on responses to gain- versus loss-framed antismoking messages. Human Communication Research, 36, 493-511.
60.
ZhaoX.StrasserA.CappellaJ. N.LermanC.FishbeinM. (2011). A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 48-75.
