The present research investigated whether message strength moderates the effect of self-affirmation on reactions given to cigarette warning labels. Three hundred eighty-four female (Study 1) and 383 male (Study 2) smokers completed a self-affirmation manipulation and then evaluated either strong or weak warning labels in terms of message derogation. Next, they reported their intentions to quit smoking. Only for the male sample, message strength moderated the effect of self-affirmation on message derogation. However, message strength did not have a moderating role on both message derogation and quit intentions for the female sample and on quit intentions for the male sample.
CohenGLAronsonJSteeleCM (2000) When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(9): 1151–1164.
2.
CohenGLShermanDK (2014) The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology65: 333–371.
3.
CorrellJSpencerSJZannaMP (2004) An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40(3): 350–356.
4.
DarleyWKSmithRE (1995) Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response. Journal of Advertising24(1): 41–56.
5.
DiBelloAMNeighborsCAmmarJ (2015) Self-affirmation theory and cigarette smoking warning images. Addictive Behaviors41: 87–96.
6.
DillardAJMcCaulKDMagnanRE (2005) Why is such a smart person like you smoking? Using self-affirmation to reduce defensiveness to cigarette warning labels. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research10(3): 165–182.
7.
EptonTHarrisPRKaneR, et al. (2015) The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology34(3): 187–196.
FaulFErdfelderELangAG, et al. (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39(2): 175–191.
10.
GlockSKneerJ (2009) Are deterrent pictures effective? The impact of warning labels on cognitive dissonance in smokers. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being1(3): 356–373.
11.
HarrisPRBrearleyISheeranP, et al. (2014) Combining self-affirmation with implementation intentions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychology33(7): 1–8.
12.
HarrisPRMayleKMabbottL, et al. (2007) Self-affirmation reduces smokers’ defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. Health Psychology26(4): 437–446.
13.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HummelKCandelMJNagelhoutGE, et al. (2017) Construct and predictive validity of three measures of intention to quit smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research20(9): 1101–1108.
15.
IlesIANanXMaZ, et al. (2019a) Smokers’ attitudes toward smoking: How self-affirming prior to viewing graphic cigarette warning labels affects explicit and implicit attitudes. In: The 69th annual international communication association conference, Washington, DC, 24–28May.
16.
IlesIANanXMaZ, et al. (2019b) Self-affirmation and defensive processing of graphic cigarette warning labels by African American smokers: A community-based study. Health Education Journal78(3): 301–314.
17.
KempfDSHarmonSK (2006) Examining the effectiveness of proposed cigarette package warning labels with graphic images among US college students. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal10(2): 77–93.
18.
KesselsLTHarrisPRRuiterRA, et al. (2016) Attentional effects of self-affirmation in response to graphic antismoking images. Health Psychology35(8): 891–897.
19.
KleinWMHarrisPRFerrerRA, et al. (2011) Feelings of vulnerability in response to threatening messages: Effects of self-affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(6): 1237–1242.
20.
MaynardOMAttwoodAO’BrienL, et al. (2014) Avoidance of cigarette pack health warnings among regular cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence136: 170–174.
21.
MemishKESchüzNFrandsenM, et al. (2017) Using self-affirmation to increase the effects of emotive health warnings on smoking: A randomized exploratory trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research19(10): 1238–1242.
22.
NapperLHarrisPREptonT (2009) Developing and testing a self-affirmation manipulation. Self and Identity8(1): 45–62.
23.
NoarSMHallMGFrancisDB, et al. (2016) Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control25(3): 341–354.
24.
RuiterRAKokG (2005) Saying is not (always) doing: Cigarette warning labels are useless. The European Journal of Public Health15(3): 329–329.
25.
SchneiderSGadingerMFischerA (2012) Does the effect go up in smoke? A randomized controlled trial of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging. Patient Education and Counseling86(1): 77–83.
26.
SchüzBCookeRSchüzN, et al. (2017) Self-affirmation interventions to change health behaviors. In: LittleLSillenceEJoinsonA (eds) Behavior Change Research and Theory. London: Elsevier, pp.87–114.
27.
SteeleCM (1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In: BerkowitzL (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.261–302.
28.
SüssenbachPNiemeierSGlockS (2013) Effects of and attention to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. Psychology & Health28(10): 1192–1206.
29.
SweeneyAMMoyerA (2015) Self-affirmation and responses to health messages: A meta-analysis on intentions and behavior. Health Psychology34(2): 149–159.
30.
Van KoningsbruggenGMMilesEHarrisPR (2018) Self-affirmation and self-control: Counteracting defensive processing of health information and facilitating health behavior change. In: De RidderDAdriaanseMFujitaK (eds) Handbook of Self-Control in Health and Wellbeing. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.495–507.
31.
WitteK (1994) Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communications Monographs61(2): 113–134.
ZhaoXNanX (2010) Influence of self-affirmation on responses to gain-versus loss-framed antismoking messages. Human Communication Research36(4): 493–511.
35.
ZhaoXPetersonEBKimW, et al. (2014) Effects of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ responses to graphic warning labels. Communication Research41(8): 1137–1158.
36.
ZhuXYzerM (2019) Testing a brief scale format self-affirmation induction for use in health communication research and practice. Communication Methods and Measures13(3): 178–197.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
