Based on gender schema theory, social role theory, and social-cognitive theory, this study investigated whether biological sex and gender conformity (femininity and masculinity) predict selective exposure to gender-typed magazines and whether this exposure, in turn, reinforces gender conformity. Participants browsed full issues—three women’s magazines, three associated with male readers, and three news magazines—while being taped. Before and after browsing, participants indicated their femininity and masculinity. Results show a strong impact of biological sex on selective magazine reading, resulting in gender-typed media use. However, gender conformity also influenced exposure. Moreover, mediation analyses showed that selective exposure to gender-typed magazines had a reinforcing effect on the gendered self-concept.
AubreyJ. S.TaylorL. D. (2009). The role of lad magazines in priming men’s chronic and temporary appearance-related schemata: An investigation of longitudinal and experimental findings. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 28-58.
2.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265-299.
3.
BaroneC. (2011).Some things never change: Gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociology of Education, 84, 157-176.
4.
BemS. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
5.
BemS. L. (1981b). The BSRI and gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88, 369-371.
6.
BemS. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In SondereggerT. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1984: Psychology and gender (pp. 179-226). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
7.
BusseyK.BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-714.
8.
ChoiN.FuquaD. (2003). The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 872-887.
9.
ChoiN.FuquaD.NewmanJ. (2008). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory—Continuing theoretical problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 881-900.
10.
ChoiN.FuquaD.NewmanJ. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory studies of the structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory Short Form with two divergent samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 696-705.
11.
Collins-StandleyT.GanS.YuH. J.ZillmannD. (1996). Choice of romantic, violent, and scary fairy-tale books by preschool girls and boys. Child Study Journal, 26, 279-302.
12.
CrossS.MadsonL. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37.
13.
DeMarreeK. G.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2007). Self and attitude strength parallels: Focus on accessibility. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 441-468.
14.
DiddiA.LaRoseR. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 193-210.
15.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sexdifferences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
EaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J. (2004). The psychology of gender. New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
18.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
19.
EcclesJ. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. mode of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
20.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
FrühW.SchönbachK. (1982). Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz. Publizistik, 27(1-2), 74-97.
22.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM.SignorielliN.ShanahanJ. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
GfK MRI. (2009). Magazine audience pocketpiece spring 2009 [WWW spreadsheet]. Retrieved from http://www.mriplus.com
24.
GoodJ. J.SanchezD. T. (2010). Doing gender for different reasons: Why gender conformity positively and negatively predicts self-esteem. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 203-214.
25.
GreenwaldA. G.FarnhamS. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
26.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
27.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J.MyersT. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In BucyE. P.Holbert LanceR. (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques. (p. 434-465). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
HaynesC.RichgelsD. (1992). Fourth graders’ literature preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 208.
29.
HeathertonT.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
30.
HoffnerC. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389-402.
31.
HoltC. L.EllisJ. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929-941.
32.
JacksonD. N. (1967). Personality research form manual. New York, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
33.
KlapperJ. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: Free Press.
34.
KnoblochS.CallisonC.ChenL.FritzscheA.ZillmannD. (2005). Children’s sex-stereotyped self-socialization through selective exposure to entertainment fare: Cross-cultural experiments in Germany, China, and the United States. Journal of Communication, 55, 122-138.
35.
KnoblochS.ZillmannD. (2003). Appeal of love themes in popular music. Psychological Reports, 93, 653-658.
36.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.AlterS. (2007). Sex-segregated news consumption: Origins of gender-typed patterns of Americans’ selective exposure to news topics. Journal of Communication, 57, 739-758.
37.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.BrückJ.HastallM. R. (2006). The gender news use divide: Impacts of sex, gender, self-esteem, achievement and affiliation motivations on German news readers’ exposure to news topics. Communications—The European Journal of Communication, 31, 329-345.
38.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.HastallM. (2006). Social comparisons with news personae: Selective exposure to news portrayals of same-sex and same-age characters. Communication Research, 33, 262-284.
39.
LazarsfeldP.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1944). The people’s choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
40.
MagerJ.HelgesonJ. (2011). Fifty years of advertising images: Some changing perspectives on role portrayals along with enduring consistencies. Sex Roles, 64, 238-252.
41.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P. J.GottfriedM.FreitasG.(2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3-25.
42.
MarkusH.KundaZ. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 858-866.
43.
MartinC. L. (1989). Children’s use of gender-related information in making social judgments. Developmental Psychology, 25, 80-88.
44.
MartinC. L.HalversonC. F.Jr. (1987). The role of cognition in sex roles and sex typing. In CarterD. B. (Ed.), Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research (pp. 123-137). New York, NY: Praeger.
45.
MillerM.ReevesB. (1976). Dramatic TV content and children’s sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Broadcasting, 20, 35-50.
46.
OliverM. B. (2000). The respondent gender gap. In ZillmannD.VordererP. (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 215-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2004, June). Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/215.pdf
48.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
49.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
50.
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.Roskos-EwoldsenB. B.CarpentierF. D. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 74-93). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
SignorielliN. (2001). Television’s contribution to stereotyping: Past, present, future. In SingerD. G.SingerJ. L. (Eds). Handbook of childrenand the media (pp. 341-358). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
SlabyR. G.FreyK. S. (1975). Development of gender constancy and selective attention to same-sex models. Child Development, 46, 849-856.
53.
SlaterM. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281-303.
54.
SuR.RoundsJ.ArmstrongP. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex difference in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.
55.
TrepteS. (2004). Soziale Identität und Medienwahl [Social identity and media choice]. Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52, 230-249.
56.
ValkenburgP.JanssenS. (1999). What do children value in entertainment programs? A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Communication, 26, 493-521.
57.
WoodW.ChristensenP. N.HeblM. R.RothgerberH. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523-535.
58.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
59.
ZillmannD. (1985). The experimental exploration of gratifications from media entertainment. In RosengrenK. E.WennerL. A.PalmgreenP. (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 225-239). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
