Appeal of personae in news is investigated based on social comparison theory. Participants (N = 276) of two age groups browsed through online news while selective exposure was unobtrusively logged. Manipulated articles focused on individuals and varied along three within factors: sex and age group of portrayed individual and story valence. After browsing news, participants completed a questionnaire including a self-esteem scale. Recipients preferred news on same-sex individuals, and young readers favored articles about same-age characters. Impacts of self-esteem to positive and negative articles, offering upward and downward comparison opportunities, were mediated by sex of recipient. Exploratory analyses indicated that this interaction results from gender-based preferences for comparison contexts—social issues for women and achievement topics for men.
Alagna, S. W. (1982). Sex role identity, peer evaluation of competition, and the responses of men and women in a competitive situation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43(3), 546-554.
2.
Armstrong, C. L. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 139-154.
3.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299.
4.
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness or healthier lifestyles?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1-44.
5.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem sex-role inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
Bennett, W. L. (1988). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
7.
Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 125-148). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
8.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construal theory and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37.
9.
Esser, F. (1999). “Tabloidization” of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291-324.
10.
Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zu Reliabilität, Validität und Stabilität der Rosenberg-Skala [Measuring self-esteem: Findings about the reliability, validity, and stability of the Rosenberg scale.] Diagnostica, 42(3), 284-292.
11.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
12.
Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Hochschild, L. (2002). When you and I are “we, ” you are not threatening: The role of self-expansion in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 239-251.
14.
Gibbons, F. X., & Boney McCoy, S. (1991). Self-esteem, similarity, and reactions to active versus passive downward comparison. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60(3), 414-424.
15.
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305.
16.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134-155.
18.
Harwood, J. (1997). Viewing age: Lifespan identity and television viewing choices. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(2), 203-213.
19.
Harwood, J. (1999). Age identification, social identity gratifications, and television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 123-136.
20.
Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389-402.
21.
Horton, D., & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 579-587.
22.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
23.
Hutson-Comeaux, S. L., & Kelly, J. R. (2002). Gender stereotypes of emotional reactions: How we judge an emotion as valid. Sex Roles, 47(1/2), 1-10.
24.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Knobloch, S., Callison, C., Chen, L., Fritzsche, A., & Zillmann, D. (2005). Children's sex-stereotyped self-socialization through selective exposure to entertainment fare. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 122-138.
26.
Knobloch, S., Weisbach, K., & Zillmann, D. (2004). Love lamentation in pop songs: Music for unhappy lovers?Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16(2), 116-124.
27.
Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. (2003). Appeal of love themes in popular music. Psychological Reports, 93(3), 653-658.
28.
Krüger, U. M. (1996). Boulevardisierung der Information im Privatfernsehen [Tabloidization of information in commercial television]. Media Perspektiven, 7362-374.
29.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518-530.
30.
Liebert, R. M., & Sprafkin, J. (1988). The early window: Effects of television on children and youth. New York: Pergamon.
31.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1997). Hedonic consequences of social comparison: A contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1141-1157.
32.
Mares, M.-L., & Cantor, J. (1992). Elderly viewers' responses to televised portrayals of old age. Communication Research, 19(4), 459-478.
33.
Miller, M., & Reeves, B. (1976). Dramatic TV content and children's sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Broadcasting, 20(1), 35-50.
34.
Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
Oegema, D., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2000). Personalization in political television news: A 13 wave survey study to assess effects of text and footage. Communications, 25(1), 43-60.
37.
Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking in news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
38.
Pew Research Center. (2004, June 8). News audiences increasingly politicized. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/215.pdf
39.
Price, V., & Czilli, E. J. (1996). Modeling patterns of news recognition and recall. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 55-78.
40.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.
41.
Reeves, B., & Miller, M. M. (1978). A multidimensional measure of children's identification with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting, 22(1), 71-86.
42.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Rucinski, D. (1992). Personalized bias in news. Communication Research, 19(1), 91-109.
44.
Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Signorielli, N. (2001). Television's gender role images and contribution to stereotyping: Past, present, future. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media(pp. 341-358). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Sparks, C., & Tulloch, J. (Eds.). (2000). Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
47.
Suls, J., Gaes, G., & Gastorf, J. W. (1979). Evaluating a sex-related ability: Comparison with same-, opposite-, and combined-sex norms. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(3), 294-304.
48.
Suls, J., Lemos, K., & Stewart, H. L. (2002). Self-esteem, construal, and comparisons with the self, friends, and peers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82(2), 252-261.
49.
Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.). (1991). Social comparison. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorizations, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
51.
Trepte, S. (2004). Soziale Identität und Medienwahl [Social identity and media choice]. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 52(2), 230-249.
52.
Tuggle, C. A. (1997). Differences in televised sports reporting of men's and women's athletics: ESPN SportsCenter and CNN Sports Tonight. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(1), 14-24.
53.
Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2004). Ego threats elicits different social comparison processes among high and low self-esteem people: Implications for interpersonal perceptions. Social Cognition, 22(1), 168-191.
54.
Vorderer, P. (1996). Picard, Brinkmann, Derrick & Co. als Freunde der Zuschauer [Picard, Brinkmann, Derrick & Co. as the viewer's friends]. In P. Vorderer (Ed.), Fernsehen als beziehungskiste. Parasoziale interaktionen und beziehungen mit medienfigure (pp. 151-169). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
55.
Vorderer, P., & Knobloch, S. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? [Parasocial relationships to TV series characters: Supplementing or functional alternative?]. Medienpsychologie, 8(3), 202-216.
56.
Wells, A. (2001). Nationality, race, and gender on the American pop charts: What happened in the '90ies?Popular Music & Society, 25(1/2), 221-231.
57.
Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271.
58.
Wills, T. A. (1991). Similarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison(pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
Wood, J. V., Giordano-Beech, M., Taylor, K. L., Michela, J. L., & Gaus, V. (1994). Strategies of social comparison among people with low self-esteem: Self-protection and self-enhancement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67(4), 713-731.
60.
Wood, J. V., Michela, J. L., & Giordano, C. (2000). Downward comparison in everyday life: Reconciling self-enhancement models with the mood-cognition priming model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(4), 563-579.
61.
Zanna, M. P., Goethals, G. P., & Hills, J. F. (1975). Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(1), 86-93.
62.
Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23(1/2), 33-51.
63.
Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1(1), 69-94.
64.
Zillmann, D., & Knobloch, S. (2001). Emotional reactions to narratives about the fortunes of personae in the news theater. Poetics, 29(3), 189-206.
65.
Zoch, L. M., & VanSlyke Turk, J. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 762-775.
