The Role of Attitude Functions and Self-Monitoring in Predicting Intentions to Register as Organ Donors and to Discuss Organ Donation With Family

Abstract

This project investigates the mechanism underlying one’s intentions to register as organ donors and to engage in family discussion about organ donation. Based on survey data collected from 306 undergraduate students, results reveal that for the donor registration model, respondents’ utilitarian and value-expressive functions predicted intentions to register, regardless of their self-monitoring tendency. For intentions to discuss organ donation with family, self-monitoring was a significant moderator such that for low self-monitors (vs. high), the utilitarian function was a more important predictor of intentions, whereas for high self-monitors (vs. low), the value-expressive attitudes were more important. The ego-defensive function was negatively associated with intentions to register but was positively associated with intentions to discuss organ donation. Both theoretical and practical implications of the findings are provided.

Keywords

attitude functions self-monitoring organ donation family discussion health behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi

W. A.

Morgan

S. E.

Stephenson

M. T.

Morse

Harrison

Reichert

Long

S. D.

(2006). Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Communication Monographs, 73, 188-215.

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Ajzen

(2002). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf

Albarracín

Johnson

B. T.

Fishbein

Muellerleile

(2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 27, 691-705.

Armitage

C. J.

Conner

(2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.

Bandura

(2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant

Oliver

M. B.

(Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bresnahan

M. J.

Lee

S. Y.

Smith

S. W.

Shearman

Nebashi

Park

C. Y.

Yoo

(2007). A theory of planned behavior study of college students’ intention to register as organ donors in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Health Communication, 21, 201-211.

Calder

B. J.

Phillips

L. W.

Tybout

A. M.

(1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 197-207.

Conner

Sparks

(1996). Theory of planned behaviour and health behaviour. In Conner

Norman

(Eds.), Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (pp. 121-162). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

10.

Dutta-Bergman

M. J.

(2003). The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication. Health Communication, 15, 101-116.

11.

Eagly

A. H.

Chaiken

(1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.

12.

Feeley

T. H.

(2007). College students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding organ donation: An integrated review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 243-271.

13.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

14.

Fishbein

Cappella

J. N.

(2006). The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication, 56, S1-S17.

15.

Gallup Organization. (2005). 2005 National Survey of Organ and Tissue Donation Attitudes and Behaviors. Washington, DC: Author.

16.

Horton

R. L.

Horton

P. J.

(1991). A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Social Science and Medicine, 33, 1037-1051.

17.

Howard

R. J.

Cornell

D. L.

Koval

C. B.

(2008). When the donor says yes and the family says no. Progress in Transplantation, 18, 13-16.

18.

Hullett

C. R.

(2002). Charting the process underlying the change of value-expressive attitudes: The importance of value-relevance in predicting the matching effect. Communication Monographs, 69, 158-178.

19.

Hullett

C. R.

(2004). Using functional theory to promote sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing: The impact of value-expressive messages and guilt. Communication Research, 31, 363-396.

20.

Hullett

C. R.

Boster

F. J.

(2001). Matching messages to the values underlying value-expressive and social-adjustive attitudes: Reconciling an old theory with a contemporary measurement approach. Communication Monographs, 68, 133-153.

21.

Hyde

M. K.

White

K. M.

(2009a). To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 880-900.

22.

Hyde

M. K.

White

K. M.

(2009b). Communication prompts donation: Exploring the beliefs underlying registration and discussion of the organ donation decision. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 423-435.

23.

Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2006). Organ donation: Opportunities for action. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

24.

Katz

(1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.

25.

Key

M. S.

Edlund

J. E.

Sagarin

B. J.

Bizer

(2009). Individual differences in susceptibility to mindlessness. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 261-264.

26.

Kopfman

J. E.

Smith

S. W.

(1996). Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign: A discriminant analysis of potential organ donors based on intent to donate. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 33-49.

27.

Lennox

R. D.

Wolfe

R. N.

(1984). Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364.

28.

Lois

López-Sáez

(2009). The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 790-799.

29.

Morgan

S. E.

(2008). The intersection of conversation, cognitions, and campaigns: The social representation of organ donation. Communication Theory, 19, 29-48.

30.

Morgan

S. E.

Harrison

T. R.

Afifi

W. A.

Long

S. D.

Stephenson

M. T.

(2008). In their own words: The reasons why people will (not) sign an organ donor card. Health Communication, 23, 23-33.

31.

Morgan

S. E.

Miller

J. K.

(2002a). Communicating about gifts of life: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 163-178.

32.

Morgan

S. E.

Miller

J. K.

(2002b). Beyond the organ donor card: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health Communication, 14, 121-134.

33.

Morgan

S. E.

Miller

J. K.

Arasaratnam

L. A.

(2003). Similarities and differences between African Americans’ and European Americans’ attitudes, knowledge, and willingness to communicate about organ donation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 693-715.

34.

Morse

C. R.

Afifi

W. A.

Morgan

S. E.

Stephenson

M. T.

Reichert

Harrison

T. R.

Long

S. D.

(2009). Religiosity, anxiety, and discussion about organ donation: Understanding a complex system of associations. Health Communication, 24, 156-164.

35.

Park

H. S.

Klein

K. A.

Smith

Martell

(2009). Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions. Health Communication, 24, 746-751.

36.

Park

H. S.

Shin

Y. S.

Yun

(2009). Differences between White Americans and Asian Americans for social responsibility, individual right and intentions to regarding organ donation. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 707-712.

37.

Park

H. S.

Smith

S. W.

(2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive norms and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33, 194-218.

38.

Park

H. S.

Smith

S. W.

Yun

(2009). Ethnic differences in intention to enroll in a state organ donor registry and intention to talk with family about organ donation. Health Communication, 24, 647-659.

39.

Petty

R. E.

Wheeler

S. C.

Bizer

(2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis. In Maio

Olsen

(Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

40.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

41.

Rosenstock

I. M.

(1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 1-8.

42.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

43.

Shavitt

(1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 124-148.

44.

Shavitt

Nelson

M. R.

(2002). The role of attitude functions in persuasion and social judgment. In Dillard

J. P.

Pfau

(Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 137-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

45.

Siminoff

L. A.

Gordon

Hewlett

Arnold

R. M.

(2001). Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 71-77.

46.

Snyder

(1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.

47.

Steele

(1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

48.

Stephenson

M. T.

Morgan

S. E.

Roberts-Perez

S. D.

Harrison

Afifi

Long

S. D.

(2008). The role of religiosity, religious norms, subjective norms, and bodily integrity in signing an organ donor card. Health Communication, 23, 436-447.

49.

Stephenson

M. T.

Quick

B. L.

Witte

Vaught

Booth-Butterfield

Patel

(2009). Conversations among coal miners in a campaign to promote hearing protection. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 317-337.

50.

United Network for Organ Sharing. (2010). Donor designation (First Person Consent) status by state. Retrieved from http://www.transplantliving.org/community/publications/newfactsheets.aspx?fact=consent

51.

van den Berg

Manstead

A. S. R.

van der Pligt

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

(2005). The role of affect in attitudes toward organ donation and donor-relevant decisions. Psychology and Health, 20, 789-802.

52.

van der Pligt

de Vries

N. K.

(1998). Belief importance in expectancy-value models of attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1339-1354.

53.

van der Pligt

Eiser

J. R.

(1984). Dimensional salience, judgment and attitudes. In Eiser

J. R.

(Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 161-178). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

54.

Wang

(2009). Integrating the theory of planned behavior and attitude functions: Implications for health campaign design. Health Communication, 24, 426-434.

55.

Wyman

Snyder

(1997). Attitudes towards gays in the military: A functional perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 306-329.