This study aimed at answering the question whether preferences for negative content and a tabloid production style in television news stories vary with different age groups and gender. An experiment with 288 participants was conducted. As expected, results showed that age and gender moderated the influence of negative content and tabloid packaging on the viewers’ preferences. Compared with middle-aged and older viewers, young viewers had a stronger preference for negative content rather than neutral content. Preferences for tabloid packaging rather than standard packaging were stronger for men than for women.
BaeH. S. (2000). Product differentiation in national TV newscasts: A comparison of the cable all-news networks and the broadcast networks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 62-77.
2.
BlairT. (2007, June12). Lecture by the Prime Minister, The Right Honourable Tony Blair M.P., on public life. London, UK: Reuters.
3.
BucyE. P.GrabeM. E. (2007). Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992–2004. Journal of Communication, 57, 652-675.
4.
Costera MeijerI. (2007). The paradox of popularity. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 96-116.
5.
DonohewL.LorchE. P.PalmgreenP. (1998). Applications of a theoretical model of information exposure to health interventions. Human Communication Research, 24, 454-468.
6.
DonohewL.PalmgreenP.DuncanJ. (1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 47, 295-303.
7.
GauntlettD.HillA. (1999). TV living. Television, culture and everyday life. London, UK: Routledge (in association with the British Film Institute).
8.
GoreA. (2007). The assault on reason. New York, NY: Penguin.
9.
GrabeM. E.KamhawiR. (2006). Hard wired for negative news? Gender differences in processing broadcast news. Communication Research, 33, 346-369.
10.
GrabeM. E.LangA.ZhaoX. (2003). News content and form. Implications for memory and audience evaluations. Communication Research, 30, 387-413.
11.
GrabeM. E.LangA.ZhouS.BollsP. D. (2000a). Cognitive access to negatively arousing news. An experimental investigation of the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 27(1), 3-26.
12.
GrabeM. E.ZhouS.LangA.BollsP. D. (2000b). Packaging television news: The effects of tabloid on information processing and evaluative responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 581-598.
13.
HallinD. C. (1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 5-24.
14.
Hendriks VettehenP.d’HaenensL.KleemansM. (2009, May21-25). Explaining sensationalist television news: A comparison of Dutch, Flemish, Walloon, and French newscasts. Paper presented at the 59th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
15.
Hendriks VettehenP.NuijtenK.BeentjesJ. (2005). News in an age of competition: The case of sensationalism in Dutch television news, 1995-2001. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 282-295.
16.
Hendriks VettehenP.NuijtenK.PeetersA. (2008). Explaining effects of sensationalism on liking of television news stories. Communication Research, 35, 319-338.
17.
HjarvardS. (2000). Proximity. The name of the rating game. Nordicom Review, 21(2), 63-81.
18.
HuysmansF.De HaanJ. (2010). Alle kanalen staan open. De digitalisering van mediagebruik [All channels open. The digitalisation of media use]. the Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
19.
HvitfeltH. (1994). The commercialisation of the evening news: Changes in narrative technique in Swedish TV news. Nordicom Review, 15(1), 33-41.
20.
JoinsonC.NettleD. (2005). Season of birth variation in sensation seeking in an adult population. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 859-870.
21.
JonesA. S. (2009). Losing the news. The future of the news that feeds democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
KahnemanD.TverskyK. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
23.
KamhawiR.GrabeM. E. (2008). Engaging the female audience: An evolutionary psychology perspective on gendered responses to news valence frames. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 33-51.
24.
KleemansM.Hendriks VettehenP. (2009). Sensationalism in television news: A review. In KonigR. P.NelissenP. W. M.HuysmansF. J. M. (Eds.), Meaningful media: Communication research on the social construction of reality (pp. 226-243). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Tandem Felix.
25.
KleinR. D. (2003). Audience reactions to local TV news. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1661-1672.
26.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
LangA. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17, 275-299.
28.
LangA.BollsP.PotterR. F.KawaharaK. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 451-475.
29.
LangA.NewhagenJ.ReevesB. (1996). Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 460-477.
30.
LangA.PotterD.GrabeM. E. (2003). Making news memorable: Applying theory to the production of local television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(1), 113-123.
31.
LangA.ShinM.BradleyS. D.WangZ.LeeS.PotterD. (2005). Wait! Don’t turn that dial! More excitement to come! The effects of story length and production pacing in local television news on channel changing behavior and information processing in a free choice environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(1), 3-22.
32.
LeshnerG.ReevesB.NassC. (1998). Switching channels: The effects of television channels on the mental representations of television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 21-33.
33.
LombardM.ReichR. D.GrabeM. E.BrackenC. C.DittonT. B. (2000). Presence and television. The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75-98.
34.
NabiR. L.KrcmarM. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14, 288-310.
35.
NewhagenJ. E.ReevesB. (1992). The evening’s bad news: The effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 25-41.
The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2008). Audience segments in a changing news environment. Key news audiences now blend online and traditional sources. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/444.pdf
38.
ReevesB. R.NewhagenJ. E.MaibachE.BasilM.KurzK. (1991). Negative and positive television messages. Effects of media type and context on attention and memory. American Behavior Scientist, 34, 679-694.
39.
SlatteryK. L.DoremusM.MarcusL. (2001). Shifts in public affairs reporting on the network evening news: A move toward the sensational. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 290-302.
40.
SlatteryK. L.HakanenE. A. (1994). Sensationalism versus public affairs. Content of local TV news; Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 205-216.
41.
SloneM. (2000). Responses to media coverage of terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44, 508-522.
42.
VandeboschH.DhoestA.van den BulckH. (2009). News for adolescents: Mission impossible? An evaluation of Flemish television news aimed at teenagers. Communications, 34(2), 125-148.
43.
Van ZoonenL. (2008). One of the girls? The changing gender of journalism. In CarterC.BranstonG.AllanS. (Eds.), News, gender and power (pp. 33-46). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
ZuckermanM. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biological bases of sensation seeking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ZuckermanM.EysenckS. B.EysenckH. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149.
