Interactive television (iTV) has enjoyed increasing penetration within the UK's emerging digital television market. As with many new media technologies, its initial marketing positioned iTV as a spectacular new form of television. This has since given way to representations and applications that rely increasingly on a positioning of iTV as `everyday'. Drawing on the work of Tom Gunning, William Boddy and Lyn Spigel, I suggest that the discursive formation of iTV is not simply one of the now familiar stories of a new technology's movement `from the spectacular and astonishing to the convenient and unremarkable' (Gunning, 2004). Rather, this movement is one that is facilitated by the prominence of `window-on-the-world' discourses that not only relate television's digitalization to the initial inception of television into everyday life, but are also illustrative of the particular institutional backdrop of the UK's television landscape and, in turn, suggestive of particular gendered assumptions and positionings.
Augé, M. (1995) Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (trans. J. Howe). London: Verso.
2.
BBC (2004) Building Public Value. London: BBC.
3.
BBC (2005) BBCi Brand Guidelines . London: BBC.
4.
BBC (2006) Statement of Programming Policy 2006-07. London: BBC.
5.
bbc.co.uk (n.d.) `What is the Red Button For?'Beginners' Guide, Digital TV Homepage, URL (accessed 5 January 2008): http://www.bbc.co.uk/digital/tv/tv_interactive.shtml
6.
Bennett, J. (2006) `The Public Service Value of Interactive Television' , New Review of Film and Television Studies4(3): 263-85.
7.
Bennett, J. (2007) `From Museum to Interactive Television: Organising the Navigable Space of Natural History Display', in J. Lyons and J. Plunkett (eds) Multimedia Histories: From the Magic Lantern to the Internet, pp. 148-62. Exeter : Exeter University Press.
8.
Boddy, W. (2004) New Media and Popular Imagination: Launching Radio, Television, and Digital Media in the United States. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Bolter, J.D. and Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
10.
Browne, N. (1987) `The Political Economy of the Television (Super)Text' , in H. Newcomb (ed.) Television: The Critical View (4th ed), pp. 488-99. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
11.
Brunsdon, C. (1997 [1991]) `Satellite Dishes and the Landscapes of Taste', in C. Brunsdon (ed.) Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes, pp. 148-64. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
BSkyB (2006) Fact Book 2006. Middlesex: British Sky Broadcasting Corporate Communications.
13.
Caldwell, J.T. (1995) Televisuality: Style, Crisis and Authority in American Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Caldwell, J.T. (2003) `Second Shift Media Aesthetics: Programming, Interactivity and User Flows', in J.T. Caldwell and A. Everett (eds) New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality, pp. 127-44. London and New York: Routledge.
15.
Chamberlain. D. (2006) `Interface Aesthetics: The Primacy of Televisual Non-Places', paper presented at Screen Conference , Glasgow, 30 June-2 July.
16.
Crary, J. (2001) Suspension of Perception: Attention, Spectacle and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Dawson, M. (2007) `Little Players, Big Shows: Television's New Smaller Screens and the Aesthetics of Convergence', Convergence13(3): 231-50.
18.
DCMS - Department of Culture, Media and Sport ( 2006) White Paper: A Public Service For All - The BBC in the Digital Age. London: HMSO.
19.
Flichy, P. (1999) `The Construction of New Digital Media', New Media and Society1(1): 33-9.
20.
Friedberg, A. (1993) Window Shopping: Cinema and Postmodernism. Berkley: University of California Press .
21.
Friedberg, A. (2006) The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
22.
Gere, C. (2002) Digital Culture. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
23.
Gough-Yates, A. (2003) Understanding Women's Magazines. London: Routledge.
24.
Gunning, T. (2004) `Re-Newing Old Technologies: Astonishment, Second Nature and the Uncanny in Technology from the Previous Turn of the Century' , in D. Thorburn and H. Jenkins (eds) Rethinking Media Changes: The Aesthetics of Transition, pp. 39-60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Hirons, P. (1999) `Extra Time', What Satellite Magazine (November): 19.
26.
Holland,P. (1987) `When a Woman Reads the News', in H. Baehr and G. Dyer (eds) Boxed In: Women and Television, pp. 133-50. London and New York: Routledge.
27.
Holmes, S. (2006) `(Re)Visiting The Grove Family - "Neighbours to the Nation" (1954-57): Television History and Approaches to Genre', New Review of Film and Television4(3): 287-310.
28.
Iosifidis, P. (2005) `Digital Switchover and the Role of the New BBC Services in Digital Television Take-Up', Convergence11(3): 58-74.
29.
Jacobs, J. (2000) The Intimate Screen: Early British Television Drama . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Jensen, J. and Toscan, C. (1999) Interactive Television: TV of the Future or the Future of TV?Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
31.
Kim, P. and Sawhney, H. (2002) `A Machine-Like New Medium - Theoretical Examination of Interactive TV', Media, Culture & Society24(2): 217-33.
32.
Laird, L. (2002) `Interactive TV Gives Sky Investors a Poor Picture' , Daily Mail, 9 October: 72.
33.
Lury, K. (2005) Interpreting Television. London : Hodder Arnold Press.
Manovich, L. (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Marvin, C. (1988) When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Millar, S. (1998) `Courtship Ends as Soccer and TV are United', the Guardian, 7 September: 3.
38.
Morley, D. (1994) `Television and Gender', in H. Newcomb (ed.) Television: The Critical View (5th edn), pp. 474-97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Morley, D. (2004) `At Home with Television', in L. Spigel and J. Olsson (eds) Television After TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, pp. 303-23. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
40.
Moseley, R. and Wheatley, H. (forthcoming 2008) `Is Archiving a Feminist Issue? Historical Research and the Past, Present and Future of Television Studies', Cinema Journal47(3).
41.
Negroponte, N. (1995) Being Digital. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
42.
New Media Age (2006) `Sky to Run More Interactive Ads as 93% of Households Press Red', 31 August.
43.
Parks, L. (2004) `Flexible Microcasting: Gender, Generation, and Television-Internet Convergence', in L. Spigel and J. Olsson (eds) Television After TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, pp. 133-56. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
44.
Rafaeli, S. (1988) `Interactivity: From New Media to Communication' , in R.P. Hawkins, S. Pingree and J. Wieman (eds) Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes , pp. 110-34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Regan, S. (2001). `Duff Television Medicine for Couch Potatoes' , Hull Daily Mail, 7 November: 14.
46.
Shepherd, I. (2005) Interview quoted in a report on `The 2nd Annual [itvt] Awards for Leadership in Interactive Television' (January 2005), iTV Today Newsletter5.98 (20 April).
